Cargando…

6-Month-Old Infants’ Sensitivity to Contingency in a Variant of the Mobile Paradigm With Proximal Stimulation Studied at Fine Temporal Resolution in the Laboratory

Infants’ ability to monitor “sensorimotor contingencies,” i.e., the sensory effects of their own actions, is an important mechanism underlying learning. One method that has been used to investigate this is the “mobile paradigm,” in which a mobile above an infant’s crib is activated by motion of one...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Popescu, Sergiu Tcaci, Dauphin, Alice, Vergne, Judith, O’Regan, J. Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7973047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33746832
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.610002
_version_ 1783666764354158592
author Popescu, Sergiu Tcaci
Dauphin, Alice
Vergne, Judith
O’Regan, J. Kevin
author_facet Popescu, Sergiu Tcaci
Dauphin, Alice
Vergne, Judith
O’Regan, J. Kevin
author_sort Popescu, Sergiu Tcaci
collection PubMed
description Infants’ ability to monitor “sensorimotor contingencies,” i.e., the sensory effects of their own actions, is an important mechanism underlying learning. One method that has been used to investigate this is the “mobile paradigm,” in which a mobile above an infant’s crib is activated by motion of one of the infant’s limbs. Although successfully used in numerous experiments performed in infants’ homes to investigate memory and other types of learning, the paradigm seems less robust for demonstrating sensitivity to sensorimotor contingencies when used in the laboratory. One purpose of the present work was to show that certain changes to the mobile paradigm would make it easier for infants to show their sensitivity to the contingency in the lab. In particular, we used proximal stimulation on infants’ wrists instead of the usual mobile, and our stimulation was coincident with the limbs that caused it. Our stimulation was either on or off, i.e., not modulated by the amount the infant moved. Finally, we used a “shaping” procedure to help the infant discover the contingency. In addition to these changes in the paradigm, by analyzing infants’ limb activity at 10-s resolution instead of the usual 1-min resolution, we were able to show that infants’ sensitivity to the contingency became apparent already within the first minute of establishment of the contingency. Finally, we showed how two alternate measures of sensitivity to contingency based on probability of repeated movements and on “stop and go” motion strategies may be of interest for future work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7973047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79730472021-03-20 6-Month-Old Infants’ Sensitivity to Contingency in a Variant of the Mobile Paradigm With Proximal Stimulation Studied at Fine Temporal Resolution in the Laboratory Popescu, Sergiu Tcaci Dauphin, Alice Vergne, Judith O’Regan, J. Kevin Front Psychol Psychology Infants’ ability to monitor “sensorimotor contingencies,” i.e., the sensory effects of their own actions, is an important mechanism underlying learning. One method that has been used to investigate this is the “mobile paradigm,” in which a mobile above an infant’s crib is activated by motion of one of the infant’s limbs. Although successfully used in numerous experiments performed in infants’ homes to investigate memory and other types of learning, the paradigm seems less robust for demonstrating sensitivity to sensorimotor contingencies when used in the laboratory. One purpose of the present work was to show that certain changes to the mobile paradigm would make it easier for infants to show their sensitivity to the contingency in the lab. In particular, we used proximal stimulation on infants’ wrists instead of the usual mobile, and our stimulation was coincident with the limbs that caused it. Our stimulation was either on or off, i.e., not modulated by the amount the infant moved. Finally, we used a “shaping” procedure to help the infant discover the contingency. In addition to these changes in the paradigm, by analyzing infants’ limb activity at 10-s resolution instead of the usual 1-min resolution, we were able to show that infants’ sensitivity to the contingency became apparent already within the first minute of establishment of the contingency. Finally, we showed how two alternate measures of sensitivity to contingency based on probability of repeated movements and on “stop and go” motion strategies may be of interest for future work. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7973047/ /pubmed/33746832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.610002 Text en Copyright © 2021 Popescu, Dauphin, Vergne and O’Regan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Popescu, Sergiu Tcaci
Dauphin, Alice
Vergne, Judith
O’Regan, J. Kevin
6-Month-Old Infants’ Sensitivity to Contingency in a Variant of the Mobile Paradigm With Proximal Stimulation Studied at Fine Temporal Resolution in the Laboratory
title 6-Month-Old Infants’ Sensitivity to Contingency in a Variant of the Mobile Paradigm With Proximal Stimulation Studied at Fine Temporal Resolution in the Laboratory
title_full 6-Month-Old Infants’ Sensitivity to Contingency in a Variant of the Mobile Paradigm With Proximal Stimulation Studied at Fine Temporal Resolution in the Laboratory
title_fullStr 6-Month-Old Infants’ Sensitivity to Contingency in a Variant of the Mobile Paradigm With Proximal Stimulation Studied at Fine Temporal Resolution in the Laboratory
title_full_unstemmed 6-Month-Old Infants’ Sensitivity to Contingency in a Variant of the Mobile Paradigm With Proximal Stimulation Studied at Fine Temporal Resolution in the Laboratory
title_short 6-Month-Old Infants’ Sensitivity to Contingency in a Variant of the Mobile Paradigm With Proximal Stimulation Studied at Fine Temporal Resolution in the Laboratory
title_sort 6-month-old infants’ sensitivity to contingency in a variant of the mobile paradigm with proximal stimulation studied at fine temporal resolution in the laboratory
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7973047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33746832
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.610002
work_keys_str_mv AT popescusergiutcaci 6montholdinfantssensitivitytocontingencyinavariantofthemobileparadigmwithproximalstimulationstudiedatfinetemporalresolutioninthelaboratory
AT dauphinalice 6montholdinfantssensitivitytocontingencyinavariantofthemobileparadigmwithproximalstimulationstudiedatfinetemporalresolutioninthelaboratory
AT vergnejudith 6montholdinfantssensitivitytocontingencyinavariantofthemobileparadigmwithproximalstimulationstudiedatfinetemporalresolutioninthelaboratory
AT oreganjkevin 6montholdinfantssensitivitytocontingencyinavariantofthemobileparadigmwithproximalstimulationstudiedatfinetemporalresolutioninthelaboratory