Cargando…

The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters

Considering the effectiveness of resisted sprint training, and the acute enhancement of sprinting performance through locomotor post-activation performance enhancement, the main objective of the research was to determine the acute effects of resisted activation with loads of 5, 10, and 15% body mass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matusiński, Aleksander, Pietraszewski, Przemysław, Krzysztofik, Michał, Gołaś, Artur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7973236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33746784
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.651659
_version_ 1783666806459727872
author Matusiński, Aleksander
Pietraszewski, Przemysław
Krzysztofik, Michał
Gołaś, Artur
author_facet Matusiński, Aleksander
Pietraszewski, Przemysław
Krzysztofik, Michał
Gołaś, Artur
author_sort Matusiński, Aleksander
collection PubMed
description Considering the effectiveness of resisted sprint training, and the acute enhancement of sprinting performance through locomotor post-activation performance enhancement, the main objective of the research was to determine the acute effects of resisted activation with loads of 5, 10, and 15% body mass on sprint and flying start sprint performance in elite female sprinters using resisted drag technology system. Ten elite female sprinters (age: 23.2 ± 5.4 years, body mass: 54.2 ± 6.1 kg, height: 167.4 ± 7.3 cm, personal best for 100 m: 12.05 ± 0.56 s, and for 400 m: 53.17 ± 2.76 s) performed two unresisted 20-m sprints (from a crouched and flying start) before and after a single resisted sprint loaded with 5, 10, or 15% body mass to verify the effectiveness of the activation stimulus. Compared with pre-activation, Friedman tests showed that peak velocity increased by 1.6 ± 2.2% [effect size (ES) = 0.66], 2.3 ± 1.5% (ES = 1.33), and 0.2 ± 1% (ES = 0.09), as well as peak force by 2.8 ± 2.1% (ES = 0.49), 3.5 ± 2.3% (ES = 1), and 0.5 ± 2.4% (ES = 0.14), concomitant with a significant decreased in sprint time by −0.5 ± 1.2% (ES = −0.07), −2.5 ± 1.3% (ES = −0.64), and −1 ± 1.4% (ES = −0.36) for the 5, 10, and 15% body mass post-activation, respectively (p < 0.001; for all). Furthermore, the ANOVA showed that peak power increased by 2.9 ± 2.3% (ES = 0.61), 3.8 ± 2.2% (ES = 1.05), and 2 ± 7.1% (ES = 0.22) for the 5, 10, and 15% body mass resisted-conditioning activity, respectively, with no difference between the three conditions (p = 0.003 main effect time, no interaction). Moreover, compared with the 5 and 15% body mass trials [−1.5 ± 2% (ES = −0.44), −0.8 ± 0.8% (ES = −0.44), respectively], the ANOVA showed that flying start sprint time significantly decreased by −4.3 ± 1.1% (ES = −1.25) (p < 0.001, interaction effect) after a 10% body mass resisted-conditioning activity. The results of this study indicated that resisted sprints acutely enhance sprint performance; however, their effectiveness depends on the applied load. A single resisted sprint using 10% body mass is effective at inducing a potentiating effect on subsequent 20-m flying start sprint performance in elite female sprinters. Therefore, keeping in mind the optimal load, it is recommended to perform resisted sprints as a conditioning activation when seeking to acutely enhance 20-m flying start sprint performance in these athletes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7973236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79732362021-03-20 The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters Matusiński, Aleksander Pietraszewski, Przemysław Krzysztofik, Michał Gołaś, Artur Front Physiol Physiology Considering the effectiveness of resisted sprint training, and the acute enhancement of sprinting performance through locomotor post-activation performance enhancement, the main objective of the research was to determine the acute effects of resisted activation with loads of 5, 10, and 15% body mass on sprint and flying start sprint performance in elite female sprinters using resisted drag technology system. Ten elite female sprinters (age: 23.2 ± 5.4 years, body mass: 54.2 ± 6.1 kg, height: 167.4 ± 7.3 cm, personal best for 100 m: 12.05 ± 0.56 s, and for 400 m: 53.17 ± 2.76 s) performed two unresisted 20-m sprints (from a crouched and flying start) before and after a single resisted sprint loaded with 5, 10, or 15% body mass to verify the effectiveness of the activation stimulus. Compared with pre-activation, Friedman tests showed that peak velocity increased by 1.6 ± 2.2% [effect size (ES) = 0.66], 2.3 ± 1.5% (ES = 1.33), and 0.2 ± 1% (ES = 0.09), as well as peak force by 2.8 ± 2.1% (ES = 0.49), 3.5 ± 2.3% (ES = 1), and 0.5 ± 2.4% (ES = 0.14), concomitant with a significant decreased in sprint time by −0.5 ± 1.2% (ES = −0.07), −2.5 ± 1.3% (ES = −0.64), and −1 ± 1.4% (ES = −0.36) for the 5, 10, and 15% body mass post-activation, respectively (p < 0.001; for all). Furthermore, the ANOVA showed that peak power increased by 2.9 ± 2.3% (ES = 0.61), 3.8 ± 2.2% (ES = 1.05), and 2 ± 7.1% (ES = 0.22) for the 5, 10, and 15% body mass resisted-conditioning activity, respectively, with no difference between the three conditions (p = 0.003 main effect time, no interaction). Moreover, compared with the 5 and 15% body mass trials [−1.5 ± 2% (ES = −0.44), −0.8 ± 0.8% (ES = −0.44), respectively], the ANOVA showed that flying start sprint time significantly decreased by −4.3 ± 1.1% (ES = −1.25) (p < 0.001, interaction effect) after a 10% body mass resisted-conditioning activity. The results of this study indicated that resisted sprints acutely enhance sprint performance; however, their effectiveness depends on the applied load. A single resisted sprint using 10% body mass is effective at inducing a potentiating effect on subsequent 20-m flying start sprint performance in elite female sprinters. Therefore, keeping in mind the optimal load, it is recommended to perform resisted sprints as a conditioning activation when seeking to acutely enhance 20-m flying start sprint performance in these athletes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7973236/ /pubmed/33746784 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.651659 Text en Copyright © 2021 Matusiński, Pietraszewski, Krzysztofik and Gołaś. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Matusiński, Aleksander
Pietraszewski, Przemysław
Krzysztofik, Michał
Gołaś, Artur
The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters
title The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters
title_full The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters
title_fullStr The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters
title_short The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters
title_sort effects of resisted post-activation sprint performance enhancement in elite female sprinters
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7973236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33746784
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.651659
work_keys_str_mv AT matusinskialeksander theeffectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters
AT pietraszewskiprzemysław theeffectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters
AT krzysztofikmichał theeffectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters
AT gołasartur theeffectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters
AT matusinskialeksander effectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters
AT pietraszewskiprzemysław effectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters
AT krzysztofikmichał effectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters
AT gołasartur effectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters