Cargando…
The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters
Considering the effectiveness of resisted sprint training, and the acute enhancement of sprinting performance through locomotor post-activation performance enhancement, the main objective of the research was to determine the acute effects of resisted activation with loads of 5, 10, and 15% body mass...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7973236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33746784 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.651659 |
_version_ | 1783666806459727872 |
---|---|
author | Matusiński, Aleksander Pietraszewski, Przemysław Krzysztofik, Michał Gołaś, Artur |
author_facet | Matusiński, Aleksander Pietraszewski, Przemysław Krzysztofik, Michał Gołaś, Artur |
author_sort | Matusiński, Aleksander |
collection | PubMed |
description | Considering the effectiveness of resisted sprint training, and the acute enhancement of sprinting performance through locomotor post-activation performance enhancement, the main objective of the research was to determine the acute effects of resisted activation with loads of 5, 10, and 15% body mass on sprint and flying start sprint performance in elite female sprinters using resisted drag technology system. Ten elite female sprinters (age: 23.2 ± 5.4 years, body mass: 54.2 ± 6.1 kg, height: 167.4 ± 7.3 cm, personal best for 100 m: 12.05 ± 0.56 s, and for 400 m: 53.17 ± 2.76 s) performed two unresisted 20-m sprints (from a crouched and flying start) before and after a single resisted sprint loaded with 5, 10, or 15% body mass to verify the effectiveness of the activation stimulus. Compared with pre-activation, Friedman tests showed that peak velocity increased by 1.6 ± 2.2% [effect size (ES) = 0.66], 2.3 ± 1.5% (ES = 1.33), and 0.2 ± 1% (ES = 0.09), as well as peak force by 2.8 ± 2.1% (ES = 0.49), 3.5 ± 2.3% (ES = 1), and 0.5 ± 2.4% (ES = 0.14), concomitant with a significant decreased in sprint time by −0.5 ± 1.2% (ES = −0.07), −2.5 ± 1.3% (ES = −0.64), and −1 ± 1.4% (ES = −0.36) for the 5, 10, and 15% body mass post-activation, respectively (p < 0.001; for all). Furthermore, the ANOVA showed that peak power increased by 2.9 ± 2.3% (ES = 0.61), 3.8 ± 2.2% (ES = 1.05), and 2 ± 7.1% (ES = 0.22) for the 5, 10, and 15% body mass resisted-conditioning activity, respectively, with no difference between the three conditions (p = 0.003 main effect time, no interaction). Moreover, compared with the 5 and 15% body mass trials [−1.5 ± 2% (ES = −0.44), −0.8 ± 0.8% (ES = −0.44), respectively], the ANOVA showed that flying start sprint time significantly decreased by −4.3 ± 1.1% (ES = −1.25) (p < 0.001, interaction effect) after a 10% body mass resisted-conditioning activity. The results of this study indicated that resisted sprints acutely enhance sprint performance; however, their effectiveness depends on the applied load. A single resisted sprint using 10% body mass is effective at inducing a potentiating effect on subsequent 20-m flying start sprint performance in elite female sprinters. Therefore, keeping in mind the optimal load, it is recommended to perform resisted sprints as a conditioning activation when seeking to acutely enhance 20-m flying start sprint performance in these athletes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7973236 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79732362021-03-20 The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters Matusiński, Aleksander Pietraszewski, Przemysław Krzysztofik, Michał Gołaś, Artur Front Physiol Physiology Considering the effectiveness of resisted sprint training, and the acute enhancement of sprinting performance through locomotor post-activation performance enhancement, the main objective of the research was to determine the acute effects of resisted activation with loads of 5, 10, and 15% body mass on sprint and flying start sprint performance in elite female sprinters using resisted drag technology system. Ten elite female sprinters (age: 23.2 ± 5.4 years, body mass: 54.2 ± 6.1 kg, height: 167.4 ± 7.3 cm, personal best for 100 m: 12.05 ± 0.56 s, and for 400 m: 53.17 ± 2.76 s) performed two unresisted 20-m sprints (from a crouched and flying start) before and after a single resisted sprint loaded with 5, 10, or 15% body mass to verify the effectiveness of the activation stimulus. Compared with pre-activation, Friedman tests showed that peak velocity increased by 1.6 ± 2.2% [effect size (ES) = 0.66], 2.3 ± 1.5% (ES = 1.33), and 0.2 ± 1% (ES = 0.09), as well as peak force by 2.8 ± 2.1% (ES = 0.49), 3.5 ± 2.3% (ES = 1), and 0.5 ± 2.4% (ES = 0.14), concomitant with a significant decreased in sprint time by −0.5 ± 1.2% (ES = −0.07), −2.5 ± 1.3% (ES = −0.64), and −1 ± 1.4% (ES = −0.36) for the 5, 10, and 15% body mass post-activation, respectively (p < 0.001; for all). Furthermore, the ANOVA showed that peak power increased by 2.9 ± 2.3% (ES = 0.61), 3.8 ± 2.2% (ES = 1.05), and 2 ± 7.1% (ES = 0.22) for the 5, 10, and 15% body mass resisted-conditioning activity, respectively, with no difference between the three conditions (p = 0.003 main effect time, no interaction). Moreover, compared with the 5 and 15% body mass trials [−1.5 ± 2% (ES = −0.44), −0.8 ± 0.8% (ES = −0.44), respectively], the ANOVA showed that flying start sprint time significantly decreased by −4.3 ± 1.1% (ES = −1.25) (p < 0.001, interaction effect) after a 10% body mass resisted-conditioning activity. The results of this study indicated that resisted sprints acutely enhance sprint performance; however, their effectiveness depends on the applied load. A single resisted sprint using 10% body mass is effective at inducing a potentiating effect on subsequent 20-m flying start sprint performance in elite female sprinters. Therefore, keeping in mind the optimal load, it is recommended to perform resisted sprints as a conditioning activation when seeking to acutely enhance 20-m flying start sprint performance in these athletes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7973236/ /pubmed/33746784 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.651659 Text en Copyright © 2021 Matusiński, Pietraszewski, Krzysztofik and Gołaś. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Matusiński, Aleksander Pietraszewski, Przemysław Krzysztofik, Michał Gołaś, Artur The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters |
title | The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters |
title_full | The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters |
title_fullStr | The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters |
title_short | The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters |
title_sort | effects of resisted post-activation sprint performance enhancement in elite female sprinters |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7973236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33746784 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.651659 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matusinskialeksander theeffectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters AT pietraszewskiprzemysław theeffectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters AT krzysztofikmichał theeffectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters AT gołasartur theeffectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters AT matusinskialeksander effectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters AT pietraszewskiprzemysław effectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters AT krzysztofikmichał effectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters AT gołasartur effectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters |