Cargando…
RECIST 1.1 and lesion selection: How to deal with ambiguity at baseline?
Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) is still the predominant criteria base for assessing tumor burden in oncology clinical trials. Despite several improvements that followed its first publication, RECIST continues to allow readers a lot of freedom in their evaluations. Notably in t...
Autores principales: | Iannessi, Antoine, Beaumont, Hubert, Liu, Yan, Bertrand, Anne-Sophie |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7973344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33738548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-00976-w |
Ejemplares similares
-
Breaking down the RECIST 1.1 double read variability in lung trials: What do baseline assessments tell us?
por: Iannessi, Antoine, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Can we predict discordant RECIST 1.1 evaluations in double read clinical trials?
por: Beaumont, Hubert, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Letter to the editor: “Not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology”
por: Iannessi, Antoine, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Discrepancies of assessments in a RECIST 1.1 phase II clinical trial – association between adjudication rate and variability in images and tumors selection
por: Beaumont, Hubert, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Comparison of tumor assessments using RECIST 1.1 and irRECIST, and association with overall survival
por: Manitz, Juliane, et al.
Publicado: (2022)