Cargando…

The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks

Attention is a complex cognitive process that selects specific stimuli for further processing. Previous research suggested the existence of three attentional networks: alerting, orienting and executive. However, one important topic is how to enhance the efficiency of attentional networks. In this co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lema, Alberto, Carvalho, Sandra, Fregni, Felipe, Gonçalves, Óscar F., Leite, Jorge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7973424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33737661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85749-7
_version_ 1783666841603801088
author Lema, Alberto
Carvalho, Sandra
Fregni, Felipe
Gonçalves, Óscar F.
Leite, Jorge
author_facet Lema, Alberto
Carvalho, Sandra
Fregni, Felipe
Gonçalves, Óscar F.
Leite, Jorge
author_sort Lema, Alberto
collection PubMed
description Attention is a complex cognitive process that selects specific stimuli for further processing. Previous research suggested the existence of three attentional networks: alerting, orienting and executive. However, one important topic is how to enhance the efficiency of attentional networks. In this context, understanding how this system behaves under two different modulatory conditions, namely transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS), will provide important insights towards the understanding of the attention network system. Twenty-seven healthy students took part on a randomized single-blinded crossover study, testing the effects that involved three modalities of unilateral stimulation (tRNS, anodal tDCS, and sham) over the DLPFC, during the performance of the attention network test (ANT) in three different conditions: standard, speed and accuracy. Results showed that tRNS was able to increase attention during more complex situations, namely by increasing alerting and decreasing conflict effect in the executive network. Under the Speed condition, tRNS increased efficiency of the alerting network, as well as under the more demanding conflict network, tRNS overall increased the performance when comparing to sham. No statistical significant effects of tDCS were observed. These results are compatible with the attention requiring the synchronization of pre-existing networks, rather the reinforcement or creation of new pathways.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7973424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79734242021-03-19 The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks Lema, Alberto Carvalho, Sandra Fregni, Felipe Gonçalves, Óscar F. Leite, Jorge Sci Rep Article Attention is a complex cognitive process that selects specific stimuli for further processing. Previous research suggested the existence of three attentional networks: alerting, orienting and executive. However, one important topic is how to enhance the efficiency of attentional networks. In this context, understanding how this system behaves under two different modulatory conditions, namely transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS), will provide important insights towards the understanding of the attention network system. Twenty-seven healthy students took part on a randomized single-blinded crossover study, testing the effects that involved three modalities of unilateral stimulation (tRNS, anodal tDCS, and sham) over the DLPFC, during the performance of the attention network test (ANT) in three different conditions: standard, speed and accuracy. Results showed that tRNS was able to increase attention during more complex situations, namely by increasing alerting and decreasing conflict effect in the executive network. Under the Speed condition, tRNS increased efficiency of the alerting network, as well as under the more demanding conflict network, tRNS overall increased the performance when comparing to sham. No statistical significant effects of tDCS were observed. These results are compatible with the attention requiring the synchronization of pre-existing networks, rather the reinforcement or creation of new pathways. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7973424/ /pubmed/33737661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85749-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Lema, Alberto
Carvalho, Sandra
Fregni, Felipe
Gonçalves, Óscar F.
Leite, Jorge
The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks
title The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks
title_full The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks
title_fullStr The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks
title_full_unstemmed The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks
title_short The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks
title_sort effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7973424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33737661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85749-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lemaalberto theeffectsofdirectcurrentstimulationandrandomnoisestimulationonattentionnetworks
AT carvalhosandra theeffectsofdirectcurrentstimulationandrandomnoisestimulationonattentionnetworks
AT fregnifelipe theeffectsofdirectcurrentstimulationandrandomnoisestimulationonattentionnetworks
AT goncalvesoscarf theeffectsofdirectcurrentstimulationandrandomnoisestimulationonattentionnetworks
AT leitejorge theeffectsofdirectcurrentstimulationandrandomnoisestimulationonattentionnetworks
AT lemaalberto effectsofdirectcurrentstimulationandrandomnoisestimulationonattentionnetworks
AT carvalhosandra effectsofdirectcurrentstimulationandrandomnoisestimulationonattentionnetworks
AT fregnifelipe effectsofdirectcurrentstimulationandrandomnoisestimulationonattentionnetworks
AT goncalvesoscarf effectsofdirectcurrentstimulationandrandomnoisestimulationonattentionnetworks
AT leitejorge effectsofdirectcurrentstimulationandrandomnoisestimulationonattentionnetworks