Cargando…
Clinical importance of ADC in the prediction of (125)I in the treatment for gliomas
Objectives: To determine whether the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (minADC) value can stratify survival in patients with glioma before (125)I brachytherapy. Methods: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. Twenty-three p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7974523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33753992 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.50789 |
_version_ | 1783666927157116928 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Congxiao Xu, Zhijian Wang, Song Peng, Lijing Zhang, Wei Li, Xueda Yang, Lili Luan, Ying Su, Tao Li, Zixiang Hu, Xiaokun |
author_facet | Wang, Congxiao Xu, Zhijian Wang, Song Peng, Lijing Zhang, Wei Li, Xueda Yang, Lili Luan, Ying Su, Tao Li, Zixiang Hu, Xiaokun |
author_sort | Wang, Congxiao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: To determine whether the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (minADC) value can stratify survival in patients with glioma before (125)I brachytherapy. Methods: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. Twenty-three patients (16 male, 7 female; median age, 48 years) with high-grade glioma (HGG) (n=9) or recurrence after multimodal treatment (n=14) were included in this study. minADC values were obtained before (125)I implantation. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed with Cox proportional hazards regression models and the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. Results: For (125)I-treated patients, the hazard ratio for OS in patients with ADC≥1.0*10^(-3) mm(2)·sec(-1) (high minADC) versus ADC<1.0*10^(-3) mm(2)·sec(-1) (low minADC) was 0.220 (95% confidence interval: 0.066, 0.735). The median OS was 12 months for patients with high minADC values and 6.0 months for those with low minADC values, and the differences were significant (p=0.032). The median PFS was 12 months for patients with high minADC values and 4 months for those with low minADC values. Significant differences were found in the long-rank test (p=0.013). The multivariate analysis results showed that minADC pre-(125)I implantation was an independent predictor of OS and PFS in patients receiving (125)I brachytherapy. Conclusions: Pre-(125)I implantation ADC analysis can stratify prognosis in (125)I-treated patients with glioma, which may aid in choosing a suitable therapy for glioma patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7974523 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79745232021-03-21 Clinical importance of ADC in the prediction of (125)I in the treatment for gliomas Wang, Congxiao Xu, Zhijian Wang, Song Peng, Lijing Zhang, Wei Li, Xueda Yang, Lili Luan, Ying Su, Tao Li, Zixiang Hu, Xiaokun J Cancer Research Paper Objectives: To determine whether the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (minADC) value can stratify survival in patients with glioma before (125)I brachytherapy. Methods: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. Twenty-three patients (16 male, 7 female; median age, 48 years) with high-grade glioma (HGG) (n=9) or recurrence after multimodal treatment (n=14) were included in this study. minADC values were obtained before (125)I implantation. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed with Cox proportional hazards regression models and the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. Results: For (125)I-treated patients, the hazard ratio for OS in patients with ADC≥1.0*10^(-3) mm(2)·sec(-1) (high minADC) versus ADC<1.0*10^(-3) mm(2)·sec(-1) (low minADC) was 0.220 (95% confidence interval: 0.066, 0.735). The median OS was 12 months for patients with high minADC values and 6.0 months for those with low minADC values, and the differences were significant (p=0.032). The median PFS was 12 months for patients with high minADC values and 4 months for those with low minADC values. Significant differences were found in the long-rank test (p=0.013). The multivariate analysis results showed that minADC pre-(125)I implantation was an independent predictor of OS and PFS in patients receiving (125)I brachytherapy. Conclusions: Pre-(125)I implantation ADC analysis can stratify prognosis in (125)I-treated patients with glioma, which may aid in choosing a suitable therapy for glioma patients. Ivyspring International Publisher 2021-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7974523/ /pubmed/33753992 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.50789 Text en © The author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Wang, Congxiao Xu, Zhijian Wang, Song Peng, Lijing Zhang, Wei Li, Xueda Yang, Lili Luan, Ying Su, Tao Li, Zixiang Hu, Xiaokun Clinical importance of ADC in the prediction of (125)I in the treatment for gliomas |
title | Clinical importance of ADC in the prediction of (125)I in the treatment for gliomas |
title_full | Clinical importance of ADC in the prediction of (125)I in the treatment for gliomas |
title_fullStr | Clinical importance of ADC in the prediction of (125)I in the treatment for gliomas |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical importance of ADC in the prediction of (125)I in the treatment for gliomas |
title_short | Clinical importance of ADC in the prediction of (125)I in the treatment for gliomas |
title_sort | clinical importance of adc in the prediction of (125)i in the treatment for gliomas |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7974523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33753992 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.50789 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangcongxiao clinicalimportanceofadcinthepredictionof125iinthetreatmentforgliomas AT xuzhijian clinicalimportanceofadcinthepredictionof125iinthetreatmentforgliomas AT wangsong clinicalimportanceofadcinthepredictionof125iinthetreatmentforgliomas AT penglijing clinicalimportanceofadcinthepredictionof125iinthetreatmentforgliomas AT zhangwei clinicalimportanceofadcinthepredictionof125iinthetreatmentforgliomas AT lixueda clinicalimportanceofadcinthepredictionof125iinthetreatmentforgliomas AT yanglili clinicalimportanceofadcinthepredictionof125iinthetreatmentforgliomas AT luanying clinicalimportanceofadcinthepredictionof125iinthetreatmentforgliomas AT sutao clinicalimportanceofadcinthepredictionof125iinthetreatmentforgliomas AT lizixiang clinicalimportanceofadcinthepredictionof125iinthetreatmentforgliomas AT huxiaokun clinicalimportanceofadcinthepredictionof125iinthetreatmentforgliomas |