Cargando…
Assessment of Concordance and Discordance Among Clinical Studies Posted as Preprints and Subsequently Published in High-Impact Journals
This cross-sectional study examines the concordance between clinical studies posted as preprints and subsequently published in high-impact journals, including key study characteristics, reported results, and study interpretations.
Autores principales: | Shi, Xiaoting, Ross, Joseph S., Amancharla, Nishita, Niforatos, Joshua D., Krumholz, Harlan M., Wallach, Joshua D. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7974637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33734411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2110 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Assessment of Preprint Policies of Top-Ranked Clinical Journals
por: Massey, Dorothy S., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Comparison of Clinical Study Results Reported in medRxiv Preprints vs Peer-reviewed Journal Articles
por: Janda, Guneet, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Journal clubs in the time of preprints
por: Avasthi, Prachee, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Publishing of COVID-19 preprints in peer-reviewed journals, preprinting trends, public discussion and quality issues
por: Kodvanj, Ivan, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Biomedical journal speed and efficiency: a cross-sectional pilot survey of author experiences
por: Wallach, Joshua D., et al.
Publicado: (2018)