Cargando…
Great expectations: minor differences in initial instructions have a major impact on visual search in the absence of feedback
Professions such as radiology and aviation security screening that rely on visual search—the act of looking for targets among distractors—often cannot provide operators immediate feedback, which can create situations where performance may be largely driven by the searchers’ own expectations. For exa...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7975232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33740159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00286-1 |
_version_ | 1783666948477812736 |
---|---|
author | Cox, Patrick H. Kravitz, Dwight J. Mitroff, Stephen R. |
author_facet | Cox, Patrick H. Kravitz, Dwight J. Mitroff, Stephen R. |
author_sort | Cox, Patrick H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Professions such as radiology and aviation security screening that rely on visual search—the act of looking for targets among distractors—often cannot provide operators immediate feedback, which can create situations where performance may be largely driven by the searchers’ own expectations. For example, if searchers do not expect relatively hard-to-spot targets to be present in a given search, they may find easy-to-spot targets but systematically quit searching before finding more difficult ones. Without feedback, searchers can create self-fulfilling prophecies where they incorrectly reinforce initial biases (e.g., first assuming and then, perhaps wrongly, concluding hard-to-spot targets are rare). In the current study, two groups of searchers completed an identical visual search task but with just a single difference in their initial task instructions before the experiment started; those in the “high-expectation” condition were told that each trial could have one or two targets present (i.e., correctly implying no target-absent trials) and those in the “low-expectation” condition were told that each trial would have up to two targets (i.e., incorrectly implying there could be target-absent trials). Compared to the high-expectation group, the low-expectation group had a lower hit rate, lower false alarm rate and quit trials more quickly, consistent with a lower quitting threshold (i.e., performing less exhaustive searches) and a potentially higher target-present decision criterion. The expectation effect was present from the start and remained across the experiment—despite exposure to the same true distribution of targets, the groups’ performances remained divergent, primarily driven by the different subjective experiences caused by each groups’ self-fulfilling prophecies. The effects were limited to the single-targets trials, which provides insights into the mechanisms affected by the initial expectations set by the instructions. In sum, initial expectations can have dramatic influences—searchers who do not expect to find a target, are less likely to find a target as they are more likely to quit searching earlier. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7975232 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79752322021-03-19 Great expectations: minor differences in initial instructions have a major impact on visual search in the absence of feedback Cox, Patrick H. Kravitz, Dwight J. Mitroff, Stephen R. Cogn Res Princ Implic Original Article Professions such as radiology and aviation security screening that rely on visual search—the act of looking for targets among distractors—often cannot provide operators immediate feedback, which can create situations where performance may be largely driven by the searchers’ own expectations. For example, if searchers do not expect relatively hard-to-spot targets to be present in a given search, they may find easy-to-spot targets but systematically quit searching before finding more difficult ones. Without feedback, searchers can create self-fulfilling prophecies where they incorrectly reinforce initial biases (e.g., first assuming and then, perhaps wrongly, concluding hard-to-spot targets are rare). In the current study, two groups of searchers completed an identical visual search task but with just a single difference in their initial task instructions before the experiment started; those in the “high-expectation” condition were told that each trial could have one or two targets present (i.e., correctly implying no target-absent trials) and those in the “low-expectation” condition were told that each trial would have up to two targets (i.e., incorrectly implying there could be target-absent trials). Compared to the high-expectation group, the low-expectation group had a lower hit rate, lower false alarm rate and quit trials more quickly, consistent with a lower quitting threshold (i.e., performing less exhaustive searches) and a potentially higher target-present decision criterion. The expectation effect was present from the start and remained across the experiment—despite exposure to the same true distribution of targets, the groups’ performances remained divergent, primarily driven by the different subjective experiences caused by each groups’ self-fulfilling prophecies. The effects were limited to the single-targets trials, which provides insights into the mechanisms affected by the initial expectations set by the instructions. In sum, initial expectations can have dramatic influences—searchers who do not expect to find a target, are less likely to find a target as they are more likely to quit searching earlier. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7975232/ /pubmed/33740159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00286-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Cox, Patrick H. Kravitz, Dwight J. Mitroff, Stephen R. Great expectations: minor differences in initial instructions have a major impact on visual search in the absence of feedback |
title | Great expectations: minor differences in initial instructions have a major impact on visual search in the absence of feedback |
title_full | Great expectations: minor differences in initial instructions have a major impact on visual search in the absence of feedback |
title_fullStr | Great expectations: minor differences in initial instructions have a major impact on visual search in the absence of feedback |
title_full_unstemmed | Great expectations: minor differences in initial instructions have a major impact on visual search in the absence of feedback |
title_short | Great expectations: minor differences in initial instructions have a major impact on visual search in the absence of feedback |
title_sort | great expectations: minor differences in initial instructions have a major impact on visual search in the absence of feedback |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7975232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33740159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00286-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coxpatrickh greatexpectationsminordifferencesininitialinstructionshaveamajorimpactonvisualsearchintheabsenceoffeedback AT kravitzdwightj greatexpectationsminordifferencesininitialinstructionshaveamajorimpactonvisualsearchintheabsenceoffeedback AT mitroffstephenr greatexpectationsminordifferencesininitialinstructionshaveamajorimpactonvisualsearchintheabsenceoffeedback |