Cargando…

Impact on radiological practice of active guideline implementation of musculoskeletal guideline, as measured over a 12-month period

BACKGROUND: An ever-increasing technological development in the field of radiology urges a need for guidelines to provide predictable and just health services. A musculoskeletal guideline was developed in Norway in 2014, without active implementation. PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of active gui...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gransjøen, Ann M, Thorsen, Kjetil, Lysdahl, Kristin B, Wiig, Siri, Hofmann, Bjørn M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7975584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33796335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2058460120988171
_version_ 1783666961881759744
author Gransjøen, Ann M
Thorsen, Kjetil
Lysdahl, Kristin B
Wiig, Siri
Hofmann, Bjørn M
author_facet Gransjøen, Ann M
Thorsen, Kjetil
Lysdahl, Kristin B
Wiig, Siri
Hofmann, Bjørn M
author_sort Gransjøen, Ann M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An ever-increasing technological development in the field of radiology urges a need for guidelines to provide predictable and just health services. A musculoskeletal guideline was developed in Norway in 2014, without active implementation. PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of active guideline implementation on the use of musculoskeletal diagnostic imaging most frequently encountered in general practice (pain in the neck, shoulders, lower back, and knees). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The total number of outpatient radiological examinations across modalities registered at the Norwegian Health Economics Administration between January 2013 and February 2019 was assessed using an interrupted time series design. RESULTS: A 12% reduction in the total examination of Magnetic Resonance Imaging shoulder and knee, and x-ray lower back and shoulder was found at a significant level (p = 0.05). Stratified analysis (Magnetic Resonance Imaging examination as one group and x-ray examinations as the other) showed that this reduction mainly was due to the reduction in the use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging examinations (shoulder and knee) which was reduced by 24% at a significant level (p = 0.002), while x-ray examinations had no significant level change (p = 0.71). No other statistically significant changes were found. CONCLUSION: The impact of the implementation on the use of imaging of the neck, shoulder, lower back, and knee is uncertain. Significant reductions were demonstrated in the use of some examinations in the intervention county, but similar effects were not seen when including a control group in the analysis. This indicates a diffusion of the implementation, or other interventions or events that affected both counties and occurred in the intervention period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7975584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79755842021-03-31 Impact on radiological practice of active guideline implementation of musculoskeletal guideline, as measured over a 12-month period Gransjøen, Ann M Thorsen, Kjetil Lysdahl, Kristin B Wiig, Siri Hofmann, Bjørn M Acta Radiol Open Original Article BACKGROUND: An ever-increasing technological development in the field of radiology urges a need for guidelines to provide predictable and just health services. A musculoskeletal guideline was developed in Norway in 2014, without active implementation. PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of active guideline implementation on the use of musculoskeletal diagnostic imaging most frequently encountered in general practice (pain in the neck, shoulders, lower back, and knees). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The total number of outpatient radiological examinations across modalities registered at the Norwegian Health Economics Administration between January 2013 and February 2019 was assessed using an interrupted time series design. RESULTS: A 12% reduction in the total examination of Magnetic Resonance Imaging shoulder and knee, and x-ray lower back and shoulder was found at a significant level (p = 0.05). Stratified analysis (Magnetic Resonance Imaging examination as one group and x-ray examinations as the other) showed that this reduction mainly was due to the reduction in the use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging examinations (shoulder and knee) which was reduced by 24% at a significant level (p = 0.002), while x-ray examinations had no significant level change (p = 0.71). No other statistically significant changes were found. CONCLUSION: The impact of the implementation on the use of imaging of the neck, shoulder, lower back, and knee is uncertain. Significant reductions were demonstrated in the use of some examinations in the intervention county, but similar effects were not seen when including a control group in the analysis. This indicates a diffusion of the implementation, or other interventions or events that affected both counties and occurred in the intervention period. SAGE Publications 2021-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7975584/ /pubmed/33796335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2058460120988171 Text en © The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons CC BY: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Gransjøen, Ann M
Thorsen, Kjetil
Lysdahl, Kristin B
Wiig, Siri
Hofmann, Bjørn M
Impact on radiological practice of active guideline implementation of musculoskeletal guideline, as measured over a 12-month period
title Impact on radiological practice of active guideline implementation of musculoskeletal guideline, as measured over a 12-month period
title_full Impact on radiological practice of active guideline implementation of musculoskeletal guideline, as measured over a 12-month period
title_fullStr Impact on radiological practice of active guideline implementation of musculoskeletal guideline, as measured over a 12-month period
title_full_unstemmed Impact on radiological practice of active guideline implementation of musculoskeletal guideline, as measured over a 12-month period
title_short Impact on radiological practice of active guideline implementation of musculoskeletal guideline, as measured over a 12-month period
title_sort impact on radiological practice of active guideline implementation of musculoskeletal guideline, as measured over a 12-month period
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7975584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33796335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2058460120988171
work_keys_str_mv AT gransjøenannm impactonradiologicalpracticeofactiveguidelineimplementationofmusculoskeletalguidelineasmeasuredovera12monthperiod
AT thorsenkjetil impactonradiologicalpracticeofactiveguidelineimplementationofmusculoskeletalguidelineasmeasuredovera12monthperiod
AT lysdahlkristinb impactonradiologicalpracticeofactiveguidelineimplementationofmusculoskeletalguidelineasmeasuredovera12monthperiod
AT wiigsiri impactonradiologicalpracticeofactiveguidelineimplementationofmusculoskeletalguidelineasmeasuredovera12monthperiod
AT hofmannbjørnm impactonradiologicalpracticeofactiveguidelineimplementationofmusculoskeletalguidelineasmeasuredovera12monthperiod