Cargando…

The ratio of shear to elastic modulus of in-plane loaded masonry

When designing unreinforced masonry buildings, the wall stiffness and, consequently, the masonry elastic and shear modulus E and G are essential parameters. Current codes provide empirical estimates of the masonry elastic modulus and a ratio between the shear and elastic modulus, G/E. This ratio, co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilding, Bastian Valentin, Godio, Michele, Beyer, Katrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7976611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01464-1
_version_ 1783667036379938816
author Wilding, Bastian Valentin
Godio, Michele
Beyer, Katrin
author_facet Wilding, Bastian Valentin
Godio, Michele
Beyer, Katrin
author_sort Wilding, Bastian Valentin
collection PubMed
description When designing unreinforced masonry buildings, the wall stiffness and, consequently, the masonry elastic and shear modulus E and G are essential parameters. Current codes provide empirical estimates of the masonry elastic modulus and a ratio between the shear and elastic modulus, G/E. This ratio, commonly taken as 0.4, is not based on scientific evidence and there appears to be no consensus concerning its value and influencing parameters, meaning that current code standards might not accurately portray the shear deformations of masonry elements. To give the choice of the G/E ratio a theoretical foundation, this paper presents closed-form expressions for the G/E ratio of running-bond masonry that capture the effects of finite joint thickness, finite wall thickness and orthotropic block properties. Based on the geometry of blocks and joints as well as their elastic parameters, a validation of the developed expression using 3D finite element analyses shows good performance. For modern masonry typologies with hollow clay bricks, a G/E ratio of 0.20–0.25 is obtained. For historical masonry typologies, such as dry stacked or mortared stone masonry, as well as solid clay brick masonry, ratios between 0.30 and 0.40 are computed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7976611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79766112021-04-05 The ratio of shear to elastic modulus of in-plane loaded masonry Wilding, Bastian Valentin Godio, Michele Beyer, Katrin Mater Struct Original Article When designing unreinforced masonry buildings, the wall stiffness and, consequently, the masonry elastic and shear modulus E and G are essential parameters. Current codes provide empirical estimates of the masonry elastic modulus and a ratio between the shear and elastic modulus, G/E. This ratio, commonly taken as 0.4, is not based on scientific evidence and there appears to be no consensus concerning its value and influencing parameters, meaning that current code standards might not accurately portray the shear deformations of masonry elements. To give the choice of the G/E ratio a theoretical foundation, this paper presents closed-form expressions for the G/E ratio of running-bond masonry that capture the effects of finite joint thickness, finite wall thickness and orthotropic block properties. Based on the geometry of blocks and joints as well as their elastic parameters, a validation of the developed expression using 3D finite element analyses shows good performance. For modern masonry typologies with hollow clay bricks, a G/E ratio of 0.20–0.25 is obtained. For historical masonry typologies, such as dry stacked or mortared stone masonry, as well as solid clay brick masonry, ratios between 0.30 and 0.40 are computed. Springer Netherlands 2020-04-15 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7976611/ /pubmed/33828408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01464-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wilding, Bastian Valentin
Godio, Michele
Beyer, Katrin
The ratio of shear to elastic modulus of in-plane loaded masonry
title The ratio of shear to elastic modulus of in-plane loaded masonry
title_full The ratio of shear to elastic modulus of in-plane loaded masonry
title_fullStr The ratio of shear to elastic modulus of in-plane loaded masonry
title_full_unstemmed The ratio of shear to elastic modulus of in-plane loaded masonry
title_short The ratio of shear to elastic modulus of in-plane loaded masonry
title_sort ratio of shear to elastic modulus of in-plane loaded masonry
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7976611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01464-1
work_keys_str_mv AT wildingbastianvalentin theratioofsheartoelasticmodulusofinplaneloadedmasonry
AT godiomichele theratioofsheartoelasticmodulusofinplaneloadedmasonry
AT beyerkatrin theratioofsheartoelasticmodulusofinplaneloadedmasonry
AT wildingbastianvalentin ratioofsheartoelasticmodulusofinplaneloadedmasonry
AT godiomichele ratioofsheartoelasticmodulusofinplaneloadedmasonry
AT beyerkatrin ratioofsheartoelasticmodulusofinplaneloadedmasonry