Cargando…
Outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and/or radiologic outcome using different polyaxial locking plates for the treatment of proximal tibia fractures, the Non-Contact-Briding plate (NCB-PT®) by Zimmer or the Variable Angle Locking Compression Plate (VA-LCP®) by Synthes. MET...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7976713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33736638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04158-z |
_version_ | 1783667051268669440 |
---|---|
author | Völk, Dominik Neumaier, Markus Einhellig, Heike Biberthaler, Peter Hanschen, Marc |
author_facet | Völk, Dominik Neumaier, Markus Einhellig, Heike Biberthaler, Peter Hanschen, Marc |
author_sort | Völk, Dominik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and/or radiologic outcome using different polyaxial locking plates for the treatment of proximal tibia fractures, the Non-Contact-Briding plate (NCB-PT®) by Zimmer or the Variable Angle Locking Compression Plate (VA-LCP®) by Synthes. METHODS: This study enrolled 28 patients with proximal tibia fractures (AO/ OTA 41 B-C) and indication for locking plate osteosynthesis. All patients were treated with a polyaxial locking plate system. Depending on the fracture morphology, patients were either treated with a NCB-PT® or VA-LCP®. The implant was chosen according to the surgeon’s experience and preference, in case of a higher degree of comminution the tendency was observed to use the NCB-PT® plate. After a time interval of 12 months postoperative we conducted clinical (e.g. range of motion, the Rasmussen score) and radiological (e.g. primary/secondary loss of reduction) follow-ups. RESULTS: Patients provided with the NCB-PT® (9 patients) showed longer operation time, use of longer implants, longer interval from injury to surgery and lower clinical scores after the 12 months follow-up compared with the VA-LCP® group (19 patients). Interestingly, the results showed no significant differences regarding the clinical and radiologic outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The small number of patients as well as the heterogeneity of fractures constitute a limitation of this study. Nevertheless, the differentiated use of implants is associated with comparable clinical and radiological outcomes. This trial emphasizes the need for further prospective randomised trials with higher patient numbers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered 21.12.2020. Registration number NCT04680247. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7976713 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79767132021-03-19 Outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial Völk, Dominik Neumaier, Markus Einhellig, Heike Biberthaler, Peter Hanschen, Marc BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and/or radiologic outcome using different polyaxial locking plates for the treatment of proximal tibia fractures, the Non-Contact-Briding plate (NCB-PT®) by Zimmer or the Variable Angle Locking Compression Plate (VA-LCP®) by Synthes. METHODS: This study enrolled 28 patients with proximal tibia fractures (AO/ OTA 41 B-C) and indication for locking plate osteosynthesis. All patients were treated with a polyaxial locking plate system. Depending on the fracture morphology, patients were either treated with a NCB-PT® or VA-LCP®. The implant was chosen according to the surgeon’s experience and preference, in case of a higher degree of comminution the tendency was observed to use the NCB-PT® plate. After a time interval of 12 months postoperative we conducted clinical (e.g. range of motion, the Rasmussen score) and radiological (e.g. primary/secondary loss of reduction) follow-ups. RESULTS: Patients provided with the NCB-PT® (9 patients) showed longer operation time, use of longer implants, longer interval from injury to surgery and lower clinical scores after the 12 months follow-up compared with the VA-LCP® group (19 patients). Interestingly, the results showed no significant differences regarding the clinical and radiologic outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The small number of patients as well as the heterogeneity of fractures constitute a limitation of this study. Nevertheless, the differentiated use of implants is associated with comparable clinical and radiological outcomes. This trial emphasizes the need for further prospective randomised trials with higher patient numbers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered 21.12.2020. Registration number NCT04680247. BioMed Central 2021-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7976713/ /pubmed/33736638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04158-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Völk, Dominik Neumaier, Markus Einhellig, Heike Biberthaler, Peter Hanschen, Marc Outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial |
title | Outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial |
title_full | Outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial |
title_short | Outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial |
title_sort | outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7976713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33736638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04158-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT volkdominik outcomeafterpolyaxiallockingplateosteosynthesisinproximaltibiafracturesaprospectiveclinicaltrial AT neumaiermarkus outcomeafterpolyaxiallockingplateosteosynthesisinproximaltibiafracturesaprospectiveclinicaltrial AT einhelligheike outcomeafterpolyaxiallockingplateosteosynthesisinproximaltibiafracturesaprospectiveclinicaltrial AT biberthalerpeter outcomeafterpolyaxiallockingplateosteosynthesisinproximaltibiafracturesaprospectiveclinicaltrial AT hanschenmarc outcomeafterpolyaxiallockingplateosteosynthesisinproximaltibiafracturesaprospectiveclinicaltrial |