Cargando…

Outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and/or radiologic outcome using different polyaxial locking plates for the treatment of proximal tibia fractures, the Non-Contact-Briding plate (NCB-PT®) by Zimmer or the Variable Angle Locking Compression Plate (VA-LCP®) by Synthes. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Völk, Dominik, Neumaier, Markus, Einhellig, Heike, Biberthaler, Peter, Hanschen, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7976713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33736638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04158-z
_version_ 1783667051268669440
author Völk, Dominik
Neumaier, Markus
Einhellig, Heike
Biberthaler, Peter
Hanschen, Marc
author_facet Völk, Dominik
Neumaier, Markus
Einhellig, Heike
Biberthaler, Peter
Hanschen, Marc
author_sort Völk, Dominik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and/or radiologic outcome using different polyaxial locking plates for the treatment of proximal tibia fractures, the Non-Contact-Briding plate (NCB-PT®) by Zimmer or the Variable Angle Locking Compression Plate (VA-LCP®) by Synthes. METHODS: This study enrolled 28 patients with proximal tibia fractures (AO/ OTA 41 B-C) and indication for locking plate osteosynthesis. All patients were treated with a polyaxial locking plate system. Depending on the fracture morphology, patients were either treated with a NCB-PT® or VA-LCP®. The implant was chosen according to the surgeon’s experience and preference, in case of a higher degree of comminution the tendency was observed to use the NCB-PT® plate. After a time interval of 12 months postoperative we conducted clinical (e.g. range of motion, the Rasmussen score) and radiological (e.g. primary/secondary loss of reduction) follow-ups. RESULTS: Patients provided with the NCB-PT® (9 patients) showed longer operation time, use of longer implants, longer interval from injury to surgery and lower clinical scores after the 12 months follow-up compared with the VA-LCP® group (19 patients). Interestingly, the results showed no significant differences regarding the clinical and radiologic outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The small number of patients as well as the heterogeneity of fractures constitute a limitation of this study. Nevertheless, the differentiated use of implants is associated with comparable clinical and radiological outcomes. This trial emphasizes the need for further prospective randomised trials with higher patient numbers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered 21.12.2020. Registration number NCT04680247.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7976713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79767132021-03-19 Outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial Völk, Dominik Neumaier, Markus Einhellig, Heike Biberthaler, Peter Hanschen, Marc BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and/or radiologic outcome using different polyaxial locking plates for the treatment of proximal tibia fractures, the Non-Contact-Briding plate (NCB-PT®) by Zimmer or the Variable Angle Locking Compression Plate (VA-LCP®) by Synthes. METHODS: This study enrolled 28 patients with proximal tibia fractures (AO/ OTA 41 B-C) and indication for locking plate osteosynthesis. All patients were treated with a polyaxial locking plate system. Depending on the fracture morphology, patients were either treated with a NCB-PT® or VA-LCP®. The implant was chosen according to the surgeon’s experience and preference, in case of a higher degree of comminution the tendency was observed to use the NCB-PT® plate. After a time interval of 12 months postoperative we conducted clinical (e.g. range of motion, the Rasmussen score) and radiological (e.g. primary/secondary loss of reduction) follow-ups. RESULTS: Patients provided with the NCB-PT® (9 patients) showed longer operation time, use of longer implants, longer interval from injury to surgery and lower clinical scores after the 12 months follow-up compared with the VA-LCP® group (19 patients). Interestingly, the results showed no significant differences regarding the clinical and radiologic outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The small number of patients as well as the heterogeneity of fractures constitute a limitation of this study. Nevertheless, the differentiated use of implants is associated with comparable clinical and radiological outcomes. This trial emphasizes the need for further prospective randomised trials with higher patient numbers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered 21.12.2020. Registration number NCT04680247. BioMed Central 2021-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7976713/ /pubmed/33736638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04158-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Völk, Dominik
Neumaier, Markus
Einhellig, Heike
Biberthaler, Peter
Hanschen, Marc
Outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial
title Outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial
title_full Outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial
title_fullStr Outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial
title_short Outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial
title_sort outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7976713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33736638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04158-z
work_keys_str_mv AT volkdominik outcomeafterpolyaxiallockingplateosteosynthesisinproximaltibiafracturesaprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT neumaiermarkus outcomeafterpolyaxiallockingplateosteosynthesisinproximaltibiafracturesaprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT einhelligheike outcomeafterpolyaxiallockingplateosteosynthesisinproximaltibiafracturesaprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT biberthalerpeter outcomeafterpolyaxiallockingplateosteosynthesisinproximaltibiafracturesaprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT hanschenmarc outcomeafterpolyaxiallockingplateosteosynthesisinproximaltibiafracturesaprospectiveclinicaltrial