Cargando…

The Odon Device™ for assisted vaginal birth: a feasibility study to investigate safety and efficacy—The ASSIST II study

BACKGROUND: The Odon Device™ is a new device for assisted vaginal birth that employs an air cuff around the fetal head for traction. Assisted vaginal birth (AVB) is a vital health intervention that can result in better outcomes for mothers and their babies when complications arise in the second stag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hotton, Emily J., Alvarez, Mary, Lenguerrand, Erik, Wade, Julia, Blencowe, Natalie S., Draycott, Tim J., Crofts, Joanna F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7977305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33741082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00814-2
_version_ 1783667105691860992
author Hotton, Emily J.
Alvarez, Mary
Lenguerrand, Erik
Wade, Julia
Blencowe, Natalie S.
Draycott, Tim J.
Crofts, Joanna F.
author_facet Hotton, Emily J.
Alvarez, Mary
Lenguerrand, Erik
Wade, Julia
Blencowe, Natalie S.
Draycott, Tim J.
Crofts, Joanna F.
author_sort Hotton, Emily J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Odon Device™ is a new device for assisted vaginal birth that employs an air cuff around the fetal head for traction. Assisted vaginal birth (AVB) is a vital health intervention that can result in better outcomes for mothers and their babies when complications arise in the second stage of labour. Unfortunately, instruments for AVB (forceps and ventouse) are often not used in settings where there is most clinical need often due to lack of training and resources, resulting in maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality which could have been prevented. This is often due to a lack of trained operators as well as difficulties in the sterilisation and maintenance of AVB devices. This novel, single use device has the potential to mitigate these difficulties as it is single use and is potentially simpler to use than forceps and ventouse. All the studies of the Odon Device to date (pre-clinical, preliminary developmental and clinical) suggest that the Odon Device does not present a higher risk to mothers or babies compared to current standard care, and recruitment to intrapartum research exploring the device is feasible and acceptable to women. The first study in which the Odon Device was used in clinically indicated conditions (the ASSIST Study) reported a lower efficacy than those reported with established devices. The reasons need to be explored, specifically focussing on learning curve, the technique of the doctors using this new device and potential modifications to device design. A follow-on clinical study to further investigate the efficacy and safety of the Odon Device in its indicated use, the ASSIST II Study, is therefore being undertaken. METHODS: The primary feasibility outcome is study feasibility (recruitment and retention rates) whilst the primary clinical outcome successful vaginal birth completed with the Odon Device. Key secondary feasibility outcomes include participant withdrawal, compliance in data collection and acceptability of the device to women and operators. Secondary clinical outcomes include maternal, neonatal and device outcomes. Safety data will be reviewed following every birth exploring maternal, neonatal and device risks. Using A’Hern approach for sample size calculation, we aim to recruit 104 women requiring an assisted vaginal birth for a recognised clinical indication. Assuming an AVB success rate of 65% or more, a one-sided alpha risk of 5% and power of 90%. DISCUSSION: The data from the ASSIST II Study will provide the information required regarding acceptability, recruitment, outcome data collection, device design, technique of device use and operator learning curve in order to design a future randomised controlled trial of the Odon Device versus current modes of assisted vaginal birth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registration: 38829082 (prospectively registered July 26, 2019) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-021-00814-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7977305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79773052021-03-22 The Odon Device™ for assisted vaginal birth: a feasibility study to investigate safety and efficacy—The ASSIST II study Hotton, Emily J. Alvarez, Mary Lenguerrand, Erik Wade, Julia Blencowe, Natalie S. Draycott, Tim J. Crofts, Joanna F. Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The Odon Device™ is a new device for assisted vaginal birth that employs an air cuff around the fetal head for traction. Assisted vaginal birth (AVB) is a vital health intervention that can result in better outcomes for mothers and their babies when complications arise in the second stage of labour. Unfortunately, instruments for AVB (forceps and ventouse) are often not used in settings where there is most clinical need often due to lack of training and resources, resulting in maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality which could have been prevented. This is often due to a lack of trained operators as well as difficulties in the sterilisation and maintenance of AVB devices. This novel, single use device has the potential to mitigate these difficulties as it is single use and is potentially simpler to use than forceps and ventouse. All the studies of the Odon Device to date (pre-clinical, preliminary developmental and clinical) suggest that the Odon Device does not present a higher risk to mothers or babies compared to current standard care, and recruitment to intrapartum research exploring the device is feasible and acceptable to women. The first study in which the Odon Device was used in clinically indicated conditions (the ASSIST Study) reported a lower efficacy than those reported with established devices. The reasons need to be explored, specifically focussing on learning curve, the technique of the doctors using this new device and potential modifications to device design. A follow-on clinical study to further investigate the efficacy and safety of the Odon Device in its indicated use, the ASSIST II Study, is therefore being undertaken. METHODS: The primary feasibility outcome is study feasibility (recruitment and retention rates) whilst the primary clinical outcome successful vaginal birth completed with the Odon Device. Key secondary feasibility outcomes include participant withdrawal, compliance in data collection and acceptability of the device to women and operators. Secondary clinical outcomes include maternal, neonatal and device outcomes. Safety data will be reviewed following every birth exploring maternal, neonatal and device risks. Using A’Hern approach for sample size calculation, we aim to recruit 104 women requiring an assisted vaginal birth for a recognised clinical indication. Assuming an AVB success rate of 65% or more, a one-sided alpha risk of 5% and power of 90%. DISCUSSION: The data from the ASSIST II Study will provide the information required regarding acceptability, recruitment, outcome data collection, device design, technique of device use and operator learning curve in order to design a future randomised controlled trial of the Odon Device versus current modes of assisted vaginal birth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registration: 38829082 (prospectively registered July 26, 2019) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-021-00814-2. BioMed Central 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7977305/ /pubmed/33741082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00814-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Hotton, Emily J.
Alvarez, Mary
Lenguerrand, Erik
Wade, Julia
Blencowe, Natalie S.
Draycott, Tim J.
Crofts, Joanna F.
The Odon Device™ for assisted vaginal birth: a feasibility study to investigate safety and efficacy—The ASSIST II study
title The Odon Device™ for assisted vaginal birth: a feasibility study to investigate safety and efficacy—The ASSIST II study
title_full The Odon Device™ for assisted vaginal birth: a feasibility study to investigate safety and efficacy—The ASSIST II study
title_fullStr The Odon Device™ for assisted vaginal birth: a feasibility study to investigate safety and efficacy—The ASSIST II study
title_full_unstemmed The Odon Device™ for assisted vaginal birth: a feasibility study to investigate safety and efficacy—The ASSIST II study
title_short The Odon Device™ for assisted vaginal birth: a feasibility study to investigate safety and efficacy—The ASSIST II study
title_sort odon device™ for assisted vaginal birth: a feasibility study to investigate safety and efficacy—the assist ii study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7977305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33741082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00814-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hottonemilyj theodondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy
AT alvarezmary theodondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy
AT lenguerranderik theodondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy
AT wadejulia theodondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy
AT blencowenatalies theodondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy
AT draycotttimj theodondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy
AT croftsjoannaf theodondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy
AT theodondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy
AT hottonemilyj odondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy
AT alvarezmary odondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy
AT lenguerranderik odondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy
AT wadejulia odondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy
AT blencowenatalies odondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy
AT draycotttimj odondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy
AT croftsjoannaf odondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy
AT odondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy