Cargando…
The Odon Device™ for assisted vaginal birth: a feasibility study to investigate safety and efficacy—The ASSIST II study
BACKGROUND: The Odon Device™ is a new device for assisted vaginal birth that employs an air cuff around the fetal head for traction. Assisted vaginal birth (AVB) is a vital health intervention that can result in better outcomes for mothers and their babies when complications arise in the second stag...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7977305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33741082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00814-2 |
_version_ | 1783667105691860992 |
---|---|
author | Hotton, Emily J. Alvarez, Mary Lenguerrand, Erik Wade, Julia Blencowe, Natalie S. Draycott, Tim J. Crofts, Joanna F. |
author_facet | Hotton, Emily J. Alvarez, Mary Lenguerrand, Erik Wade, Julia Blencowe, Natalie S. Draycott, Tim J. Crofts, Joanna F. |
author_sort | Hotton, Emily J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Odon Device™ is a new device for assisted vaginal birth that employs an air cuff around the fetal head for traction. Assisted vaginal birth (AVB) is a vital health intervention that can result in better outcomes for mothers and their babies when complications arise in the second stage of labour. Unfortunately, instruments for AVB (forceps and ventouse) are often not used in settings where there is most clinical need often due to lack of training and resources, resulting in maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality which could have been prevented. This is often due to a lack of trained operators as well as difficulties in the sterilisation and maintenance of AVB devices. This novel, single use device has the potential to mitigate these difficulties as it is single use and is potentially simpler to use than forceps and ventouse. All the studies of the Odon Device to date (pre-clinical, preliminary developmental and clinical) suggest that the Odon Device does not present a higher risk to mothers or babies compared to current standard care, and recruitment to intrapartum research exploring the device is feasible and acceptable to women. The first study in which the Odon Device was used in clinically indicated conditions (the ASSIST Study) reported a lower efficacy than those reported with established devices. The reasons need to be explored, specifically focussing on learning curve, the technique of the doctors using this new device and potential modifications to device design. A follow-on clinical study to further investigate the efficacy and safety of the Odon Device in its indicated use, the ASSIST II Study, is therefore being undertaken. METHODS: The primary feasibility outcome is study feasibility (recruitment and retention rates) whilst the primary clinical outcome successful vaginal birth completed with the Odon Device. Key secondary feasibility outcomes include participant withdrawal, compliance in data collection and acceptability of the device to women and operators. Secondary clinical outcomes include maternal, neonatal and device outcomes. Safety data will be reviewed following every birth exploring maternal, neonatal and device risks. Using A’Hern approach for sample size calculation, we aim to recruit 104 women requiring an assisted vaginal birth for a recognised clinical indication. Assuming an AVB success rate of 65% or more, a one-sided alpha risk of 5% and power of 90%. DISCUSSION: The data from the ASSIST II Study will provide the information required regarding acceptability, recruitment, outcome data collection, device design, technique of device use and operator learning curve in order to design a future randomised controlled trial of the Odon Device versus current modes of assisted vaginal birth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registration: 38829082 (prospectively registered July 26, 2019) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-021-00814-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7977305 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79773052021-03-22 The Odon Device™ for assisted vaginal birth: a feasibility study to investigate safety and efficacy—The ASSIST II study Hotton, Emily J. Alvarez, Mary Lenguerrand, Erik Wade, Julia Blencowe, Natalie S. Draycott, Tim J. Crofts, Joanna F. Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The Odon Device™ is a new device for assisted vaginal birth that employs an air cuff around the fetal head for traction. Assisted vaginal birth (AVB) is a vital health intervention that can result in better outcomes for mothers and their babies when complications arise in the second stage of labour. Unfortunately, instruments for AVB (forceps and ventouse) are often not used in settings where there is most clinical need often due to lack of training and resources, resulting in maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality which could have been prevented. This is often due to a lack of trained operators as well as difficulties in the sterilisation and maintenance of AVB devices. This novel, single use device has the potential to mitigate these difficulties as it is single use and is potentially simpler to use than forceps and ventouse. All the studies of the Odon Device to date (pre-clinical, preliminary developmental and clinical) suggest that the Odon Device does not present a higher risk to mothers or babies compared to current standard care, and recruitment to intrapartum research exploring the device is feasible and acceptable to women. The first study in which the Odon Device was used in clinically indicated conditions (the ASSIST Study) reported a lower efficacy than those reported with established devices. The reasons need to be explored, specifically focussing on learning curve, the technique of the doctors using this new device and potential modifications to device design. A follow-on clinical study to further investigate the efficacy and safety of the Odon Device in its indicated use, the ASSIST II Study, is therefore being undertaken. METHODS: The primary feasibility outcome is study feasibility (recruitment and retention rates) whilst the primary clinical outcome successful vaginal birth completed with the Odon Device. Key secondary feasibility outcomes include participant withdrawal, compliance in data collection and acceptability of the device to women and operators. Secondary clinical outcomes include maternal, neonatal and device outcomes. Safety data will be reviewed following every birth exploring maternal, neonatal and device risks. Using A’Hern approach for sample size calculation, we aim to recruit 104 women requiring an assisted vaginal birth for a recognised clinical indication. Assuming an AVB success rate of 65% or more, a one-sided alpha risk of 5% and power of 90%. DISCUSSION: The data from the ASSIST II Study will provide the information required regarding acceptability, recruitment, outcome data collection, device design, technique of device use and operator learning curve in order to design a future randomised controlled trial of the Odon Device versus current modes of assisted vaginal birth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registration: 38829082 (prospectively registered July 26, 2019) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-021-00814-2. BioMed Central 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7977305/ /pubmed/33741082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00814-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Hotton, Emily J. Alvarez, Mary Lenguerrand, Erik Wade, Julia Blencowe, Natalie S. Draycott, Tim J. Crofts, Joanna F. The Odon Device™ for assisted vaginal birth: a feasibility study to investigate safety and efficacy—The ASSIST II study |
title | The Odon Device™ for assisted vaginal birth: a feasibility study to investigate safety and efficacy—The ASSIST II study |
title_full | The Odon Device™ for assisted vaginal birth: a feasibility study to investigate safety and efficacy—The ASSIST II study |
title_fullStr | The Odon Device™ for assisted vaginal birth: a feasibility study to investigate safety and efficacy—The ASSIST II study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Odon Device™ for assisted vaginal birth: a feasibility study to investigate safety and efficacy—The ASSIST II study |
title_short | The Odon Device™ for assisted vaginal birth: a feasibility study to investigate safety and efficacy—The ASSIST II study |
title_sort | odon device™ for assisted vaginal birth: a feasibility study to investigate safety and efficacy—the assist ii study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7977305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33741082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00814-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hottonemilyj theodondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy AT alvarezmary theodondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy AT lenguerranderik theodondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy AT wadejulia theodondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy AT blencowenatalies theodondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy AT draycotttimj theodondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy AT croftsjoannaf theodondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy AT theodondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy AT hottonemilyj odondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy AT alvarezmary odondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy AT lenguerranderik odondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy AT wadejulia odondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy AT blencowenatalies odondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy AT draycotttimj odondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy AT croftsjoannaf odondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy AT odondeviceforassistedvaginalbirthafeasibilitystudytoinvestigatesafetyandefficacytheassistiistudy |