Cargando…

Controlled ovarian stimulation should not be preferred for male infertility treated with intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Some studies have stated that intrauterine insemination (IUI) with controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) might increase the pregnancy rate, while others suggest that IUI in the natural cycle (NC) should be the first line of treatment. It remains unclear whether it is necessary to use COS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Yan, He, Qian-Dong, Zhang, Ting-Ting, Wang, Jing-Jing, Huang, Si-Chong, Ye, Yun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7977560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33740990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00730-3
_version_ 1783667127154114560
author Tang, Yan
He, Qian-Dong
Zhang, Ting-Ting
Wang, Jing-Jing
Huang, Si-Chong
Ye, Yun
author_facet Tang, Yan
He, Qian-Dong
Zhang, Ting-Ting
Wang, Jing-Jing
Huang, Si-Chong
Ye, Yun
author_sort Tang, Yan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Some studies have stated that intrauterine insemination (IUI) with controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) might increase the pregnancy rate, while others suggest that IUI in the natural cycle (NC) should be the first line of treatment. It remains unclear whether it is necessary to use COS at the same time when IUI is applied to treat isolated male factor infertility. Thus, we aimed to investigate efficacy of IUI with COS for isolated male factor infertility. METHODS: A total of 601 IUI cycles from 307 couples who sought medical care for isolated male factor infertility between January 2010 and February 2020 were divided into two groups: NC-IUI and COS-IUI. The COS-IUI group was further divided into two subgroups according to the number of pre-ovulatory follicles on the day of HCG: cycles with monofollicular development (one follicle group) and cycles with at least two pre-ovulatory follicles (≥ 2 follicles group). The IUI outcomes, including clinical pregnancy, live birth, spontaneous abortion, ectopic pregnancy, and multiple pregnancy rates were compared. RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy, live birth, spontaneous abortion, and ectopic pregnancy rates were comparable between the NC-IUI and COS-IUI group. Similar results were also observed among the NC-IUI, one follicle, and ≥ 2 follicles groups. However, with respect to the multiple pregnancy rate, a trend toward higher multiple pregnancy rate was observed in the COS-IUI group compared to the NC-IUI group (8.7% vs. 0, P = 0.091), and a significant difference was found between the NC-IUI and ≥ 2 follicles group (0 vs. 16.7%, P = 0.033). CONCLUSION: In COS cycles, especially in those with at least two pre-ovulatory follicles, the multiple pregnancy rate increased without a substantial gain in overall pregnancy rate; thus, COS should not be preferred in IUI for isolated male factor infertility. If COS is required, one stimulated follicle and one healthy baby should be the goal considering the safety of both mothers and foetuses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-021-00730-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7977560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79775602021-03-22 Controlled ovarian stimulation should not be preferred for male infertility treated with intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study Tang, Yan He, Qian-Dong Zhang, Ting-Ting Wang, Jing-Jing Huang, Si-Chong Ye, Yun Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Some studies have stated that intrauterine insemination (IUI) with controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) might increase the pregnancy rate, while others suggest that IUI in the natural cycle (NC) should be the first line of treatment. It remains unclear whether it is necessary to use COS at the same time when IUI is applied to treat isolated male factor infertility. Thus, we aimed to investigate efficacy of IUI with COS for isolated male factor infertility. METHODS: A total of 601 IUI cycles from 307 couples who sought medical care for isolated male factor infertility between January 2010 and February 2020 were divided into two groups: NC-IUI and COS-IUI. The COS-IUI group was further divided into two subgroups according to the number of pre-ovulatory follicles on the day of HCG: cycles with monofollicular development (one follicle group) and cycles with at least two pre-ovulatory follicles (≥ 2 follicles group). The IUI outcomes, including clinical pregnancy, live birth, spontaneous abortion, ectopic pregnancy, and multiple pregnancy rates were compared. RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy, live birth, spontaneous abortion, and ectopic pregnancy rates were comparable between the NC-IUI and COS-IUI group. Similar results were also observed among the NC-IUI, one follicle, and ≥ 2 follicles groups. However, with respect to the multiple pregnancy rate, a trend toward higher multiple pregnancy rate was observed in the COS-IUI group compared to the NC-IUI group (8.7% vs. 0, P = 0.091), and a significant difference was found between the NC-IUI and ≥ 2 follicles group (0 vs. 16.7%, P = 0.033). CONCLUSION: In COS cycles, especially in those with at least two pre-ovulatory follicles, the multiple pregnancy rate increased without a substantial gain in overall pregnancy rate; thus, COS should not be preferred in IUI for isolated male factor infertility. If COS is required, one stimulated follicle and one healthy baby should be the goal considering the safety of both mothers and foetuses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-021-00730-3. BioMed Central 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7977560/ /pubmed/33740990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00730-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tang, Yan
He, Qian-Dong
Zhang, Ting-Ting
Wang, Jing-Jing
Huang, Si-Chong
Ye, Yun
Controlled ovarian stimulation should not be preferred for male infertility treated with intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study
title Controlled ovarian stimulation should not be preferred for male infertility treated with intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study
title_full Controlled ovarian stimulation should not be preferred for male infertility treated with intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Controlled ovarian stimulation should not be preferred for male infertility treated with intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Controlled ovarian stimulation should not be preferred for male infertility treated with intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study
title_short Controlled ovarian stimulation should not be preferred for male infertility treated with intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study
title_sort controlled ovarian stimulation should not be preferred for male infertility treated with intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7977560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33740990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00730-3
work_keys_str_mv AT tangyan controlledovarianstimulationshouldnotbepreferredformaleinfertilitytreatedwithintrauterineinseminationaretrospectivestudy
AT heqiandong controlledovarianstimulationshouldnotbepreferredformaleinfertilitytreatedwithintrauterineinseminationaretrospectivestudy
AT zhangtingting controlledovarianstimulationshouldnotbepreferredformaleinfertilitytreatedwithintrauterineinseminationaretrospectivestudy
AT wangjingjing controlledovarianstimulationshouldnotbepreferredformaleinfertilitytreatedwithintrauterineinseminationaretrospectivestudy
AT huangsichong controlledovarianstimulationshouldnotbepreferredformaleinfertilitytreatedwithintrauterineinseminationaretrospectivestudy
AT yeyun controlledovarianstimulationshouldnotbepreferredformaleinfertilitytreatedwithintrauterineinseminationaretrospectivestudy