Cargando…

Mechanical evaluation of the “Hüfner hand” prosthesis

Current body-powered hands have very low acceptance rates. They also require high activation forces. In the past, a high acceptance rate was reported for the then-available Hüfner hand, a hand which could be controlled by relatively low activation forces. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to meas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Smit, Gerwin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7978037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33834745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309364620952900
_version_ 1783667145907896320
author Smit, Gerwin
author_facet Smit, Gerwin
author_sort Smit, Gerwin
collection PubMed
description Current body-powered hands have very low acceptance rates. They also require high activation forces. In the past, a high acceptance rate was reported for the then-available Hüfner hand, a hand which could be controlled by relatively low activation forces. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure and quantify the mechanical performance of the Hüfner hand. STUDY DESIGN: Mechanical evaluation. METHODS: Two versions of the Hüfner hand were tested using a mechanical test bench. Forces and displacements were measured under four different glove conditions (no glove, leather, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), silicone). The measured results were compared to data from currently available voluntary-closing hands. RESULTS: The Hüfner hand required 132–170 Nmm of work and 78–104 N cable force to pinch 15 N. The overall mechanical performance of the Hüfner hands is better than currently available body-powered hands. CONCLUSION: The mechanical performance of the Hüfner hand was measured and quantified. Mechanical testing results show that the Hüfner hand has better mechanical performance than current body-powered hands. This may have contributed to its reported high acceptance rates. The design of the Hüfner hand, combined with data presented in this study, can serve as guidelines for the design of a new generation of body-powered hands.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7978037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79780372021-03-29 Mechanical evaluation of the “Hüfner hand” prosthesis Smit, Gerwin Prosthet Orthot Int Original Research Report Current body-powered hands have very low acceptance rates. They also require high activation forces. In the past, a high acceptance rate was reported for the then-available Hüfner hand, a hand which could be controlled by relatively low activation forces. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure and quantify the mechanical performance of the Hüfner hand. STUDY DESIGN: Mechanical evaluation. METHODS: Two versions of the Hüfner hand were tested using a mechanical test bench. Forces and displacements were measured under four different glove conditions (no glove, leather, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), silicone). The measured results were compared to data from currently available voluntary-closing hands. RESULTS: The Hüfner hand required 132–170 Nmm of work and 78–104 N cable force to pinch 15 N. The overall mechanical performance of the Hüfner hands is better than currently available body-powered hands. CONCLUSION: The mechanical performance of the Hüfner hand was measured and quantified. Mechanical testing results show that the Hüfner hand has better mechanical performance than current body-powered hands. This may have contributed to its reported high acceptance rates. The design of the Hüfner hand, combined with data presented in this study, can serve as guidelines for the design of a new generation of body-powered hands. Wolters Kluwer 2021-02 2020-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7978037/ /pubmed/33834745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309364620952900 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author. Published by Wolters Kluwer incorporated on behalf of International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Report
Smit, Gerwin
Mechanical evaluation of the “Hüfner hand” prosthesis
title Mechanical evaluation of the “Hüfner hand” prosthesis
title_full Mechanical evaluation of the “Hüfner hand” prosthesis
title_fullStr Mechanical evaluation of the “Hüfner hand” prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical evaluation of the “Hüfner hand” prosthesis
title_short Mechanical evaluation of the “Hüfner hand” prosthesis
title_sort mechanical evaluation of the “hüfner hand” prosthesis
topic Original Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7978037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33834745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309364620952900
work_keys_str_mv AT smitgerwin mechanicalevaluationofthehufnerhandprosthesis