Cargando…

Predictors of Unsatisfactory Conventional Pap Smears

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine the clinical predictors of unsatisfactory Pap smears. METHODOLOGY: This was a case–control study done in a tertiary care institute. All unsatisfactory conventional pap (CP) smears between January 2015 and June 2017 were retrieved, and the slides...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Reetika, Ambroise, Marie Moses, Ramdas, Anita, Ravichandran, Kandasamy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7978046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33767564
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmh.JMH_110_20
_version_ 1783667146596810752
author Sharma, Reetika
Ambroise, Marie Moses
Ramdas, Anita
Ravichandran, Kandasamy
author_facet Sharma, Reetika
Ambroise, Marie Moses
Ramdas, Anita
Ravichandran, Kandasamy
author_sort Sharma, Reetika
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine the clinical predictors of unsatisfactory Pap smears. METHODOLOGY: This was a case–control study done in a tertiary care institute. All unsatisfactory conventional pap (CP) smears between January 2015 and June 2017 were retrieved, and the slides were viewed. Clinical details were recorded from request forms and case files. Simple and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to identify the predictors of unsatisfactory CP smears. RESULTS: In this study, we have included 314 unsatisfactory Pap smears and 541 controls with satisfactory Pap smears. Clinical parameters such as older age and cervical erosion proved to be important predictors of unsatisfactory pap smears. The most common reason for unsatisfactory pap smears was due to a paucity of epithelial elements (66.6%), followed by obscuration of smear details by blood/inflammatory cells/mucus (9.9%) and air drying artifacts (4.4%). There were multiple reasons in 19.1% of cases with unsatisfactory pap smears. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that older age groups and cervical erosion are predictors of unsatisfactory pap smears. Incidence of unsatisfactory pap smears can be reduced by education and retraining of health-care workers and doctors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7978046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79780462021-03-24 Predictors of Unsatisfactory Conventional Pap Smears Sharma, Reetika Ambroise, Marie Moses Ramdas, Anita Ravichandran, Kandasamy J Midlife Health Original Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine the clinical predictors of unsatisfactory Pap smears. METHODOLOGY: This was a case–control study done in a tertiary care institute. All unsatisfactory conventional pap (CP) smears between January 2015 and June 2017 were retrieved, and the slides were viewed. Clinical details were recorded from request forms and case files. Simple and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to identify the predictors of unsatisfactory CP smears. RESULTS: In this study, we have included 314 unsatisfactory Pap smears and 541 controls with satisfactory Pap smears. Clinical parameters such as older age and cervical erosion proved to be important predictors of unsatisfactory pap smears. The most common reason for unsatisfactory pap smears was due to a paucity of epithelial elements (66.6%), followed by obscuration of smear details by blood/inflammatory cells/mucus (9.9%) and air drying artifacts (4.4%). There were multiple reasons in 19.1% of cases with unsatisfactory pap smears. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that older age groups and cervical erosion are predictors of unsatisfactory pap smears. Incidence of unsatisfactory pap smears can be reduced by education and retraining of health-care workers and doctors. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7978046/ /pubmed/33767564 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmh.JMH_110_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Mid-life Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharma, Reetika
Ambroise, Marie Moses
Ramdas, Anita
Ravichandran, Kandasamy
Predictors of Unsatisfactory Conventional Pap Smears
title Predictors of Unsatisfactory Conventional Pap Smears
title_full Predictors of Unsatisfactory Conventional Pap Smears
title_fullStr Predictors of Unsatisfactory Conventional Pap Smears
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of Unsatisfactory Conventional Pap Smears
title_short Predictors of Unsatisfactory Conventional Pap Smears
title_sort predictors of unsatisfactory conventional pap smears
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7978046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33767564
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmh.JMH_110_20
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmareetika predictorsofunsatisfactoryconventionalpapsmears
AT ambroisemariemoses predictorsofunsatisfactoryconventionalpapsmears
AT ramdasanita predictorsofunsatisfactoryconventionalpapsmears
AT ravichandrankandasamy predictorsofunsatisfactoryconventionalpapsmears