Cargando…

Comparing the impact of upfront radiosurgery versus expectation in vestibular schwannoma (the V-REX study): protocol for a randomised, observer-blinded, 4-year, parallel-group, single-centre, superiority study

INTRODUCTION: The optimal management of small-sized to medium-sized vestibular schwannoma (VS) is a matter of controversy. Clinical results of the prevailing treatment modalities (microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and conservative management (CM)) are documented, but comparative studies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhayalan, Dhanushan, Tveiten, Øystein Vesterli, Goplen, Frederik Kragerud, Finnkirk, Monica Katrine, Storstein, Anette Margrethe, Gruner, Eli Renate, Lund-Johansen, Morten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7978102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33737417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039396
_version_ 1783667154576474112
author Dhayalan, Dhanushan
Tveiten, Øystein Vesterli
Goplen, Frederik Kragerud
Finnkirk, Monica Katrine
Storstein, Anette Margrethe
Gruner, Eli Renate
Lund-Johansen, Morten
author_facet Dhayalan, Dhanushan
Tveiten, Øystein Vesterli
Goplen, Frederik Kragerud
Finnkirk, Monica Katrine
Storstein, Anette Margrethe
Gruner, Eli Renate
Lund-Johansen, Morten
author_sort Dhayalan, Dhanushan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The optimal management of small-sized to medium-sized vestibular schwannoma (VS) is a matter of controversy. Clinical results of the prevailing treatment modalities (microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and conservative management (CM)) are documented, but comparative studies are few, and none are randomised or blinded. Upfront radiosurgery, or a careful follow-up by MRI with subsequent treatment on growth, are two strategies used at many centres. The present study aims at comparing these strategies by randomising individuals with newly diagnosed tumours to either upfront SRS or initial CM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Vestibular Schwannoma: Radiosurgery or Expectation study is designed as a randomised, controlled, observer-blinded, single-centre superiority trial with two parallel groups. Eligible patients will be randomised using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes, and the radiosurgery group will undergo standard Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) within 2 months following randomisation. The primary endpoint is tumour growth measured as volume ratio V(4years)/V(baseline) and volume doubling time, evaluated by annual T1 contrast MRI volumetric analysis. Secondary endpoints include symptom and sign development measured by clinical examination, audiovestibular tests, and by patient’s responses to standardised validated questionnaires. In addition, the patient’s working status, and the health economics involved with both strategies will be evaluated and compared. All outcome assessments will be performed by blinded observers. Power analysis indicates that 100 patients is sufficient to demonstrate the effect of GKRS on tumour volume. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has ethical approval from the Regional Ethical Committee (23503) and funding from The Western Norway Regional Health Authority. Trial methods and results will be reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 guidelines in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical trials: NCT02249572. Haukeland University Hospital record: 2014/314. Regional Ethical Committee (REC West): 23 503. The Western Norway Regional Health Authority: 912 281.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7978102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79781022021-03-30 Comparing the impact of upfront radiosurgery versus expectation in vestibular schwannoma (the V-REX study): protocol for a randomised, observer-blinded, 4-year, parallel-group, single-centre, superiority study Dhayalan, Dhanushan Tveiten, Øystein Vesterli Goplen, Frederik Kragerud Finnkirk, Monica Katrine Storstein, Anette Margrethe Gruner, Eli Renate Lund-Johansen, Morten BMJ Open Neurology INTRODUCTION: The optimal management of small-sized to medium-sized vestibular schwannoma (VS) is a matter of controversy. Clinical results of the prevailing treatment modalities (microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and conservative management (CM)) are documented, but comparative studies are few, and none are randomised or blinded. Upfront radiosurgery, or a careful follow-up by MRI with subsequent treatment on growth, are two strategies used at many centres. The present study aims at comparing these strategies by randomising individuals with newly diagnosed tumours to either upfront SRS or initial CM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Vestibular Schwannoma: Radiosurgery or Expectation study is designed as a randomised, controlled, observer-blinded, single-centre superiority trial with two parallel groups. Eligible patients will be randomised using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes, and the radiosurgery group will undergo standard Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) within 2 months following randomisation. The primary endpoint is tumour growth measured as volume ratio V(4years)/V(baseline) and volume doubling time, evaluated by annual T1 contrast MRI volumetric analysis. Secondary endpoints include symptom and sign development measured by clinical examination, audiovestibular tests, and by patient’s responses to standardised validated questionnaires. In addition, the patient’s working status, and the health economics involved with both strategies will be evaluated and compared. All outcome assessments will be performed by blinded observers. Power analysis indicates that 100 patients is sufficient to demonstrate the effect of GKRS on tumour volume. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has ethical approval from the Regional Ethical Committee (23503) and funding from The Western Norway Regional Health Authority. Trial methods and results will be reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 guidelines in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical trials: NCT02249572. Haukeland University Hospital record: 2014/314. Regional Ethical Committee (REC West): 23 503. The Western Norway Regional Health Authority: 912 281. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7978102/ /pubmed/33737417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039396 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Neurology
Dhayalan, Dhanushan
Tveiten, Øystein Vesterli
Goplen, Frederik Kragerud
Finnkirk, Monica Katrine
Storstein, Anette Margrethe
Gruner, Eli Renate
Lund-Johansen, Morten
Comparing the impact of upfront radiosurgery versus expectation in vestibular schwannoma (the V-REX study): protocol for a randomised, observer-blinded, 4-year, parallel-group, single-centre, superiority study
title Comparing the impact of upfront radiosurgery versus expectation in vestibular schwannoma (the V-REX study): protocol for a randomised, observer-blinded, 4-year, parallel-group, single-centre, superiority study
title_full Comparing the impact of upfront radiosurgery versus expectation in vestibular schwannoma (the V-REX study): protocol for a randomised, observer-blinded, 4-year, parallel-group, single-centre, superiority study
title_fullStr Comparing the impact of upfront radiosurgery versus expectation in vestibular schwannoma (the V-REX study): protocol for a randomised, observer-blinded, 4-year, parallel-group, single-centre, superiority study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the impact of upfront radiosurgery versus expectation in vestibular schwannoma (the V-REX study): protocol for a randomised, observer-blinded, 4-year, parallel-group, single-centre, superiority study
title_short Comparing the impact of upfront radiosurgery versus expectation in vestibular schwannoma (the V-REX study): protocol for a randomised, observer-blinded, 4-year, parallel-group, single-centre, superiority study
title_sort comparing the impact of upfront radiosurgery versus expectation in vestibular schwannoma (the v-rex study): protocol for a randomised, observer-blinded, 4-year, parallel-group, single-centre, superiority study
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7978102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33737417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039396
work_keys_str_mv AT dhayalandhanushan comparingtheimpactofupfrontradiosurgeryversusexpectationinvestibularschwannomathevrexstudyprotocolforarandomisedobserverblinded4yearparallelgroupsinglecentresuperioritystudy
AT tveitenøysteinvesterli comparingtheimpactofupfrontradiosurgeryversusexpectationinvestibularschwannomathevrexstudyprotocolforarandomisedobserverblinded4yearparallelgroupsinglecentresuperioritystudy
AT goplenfrederikkragerud comparingtheimpactofupfrontradiosurgeryversusexpectationinvestibularschwannomathevrexstudyprotocolforarandomisedobserverblinded4yearparallelgroupsinglecentresuperioritystudy
AT finnkirkmonicakatrine comparingtheimpactofupfrontradiosurgeryversusexpectationinvestibularschwannomathevrexstudyprotocolforarandomisedobserverblinded4yearparallelgroupsinglecentresuperioritystudy
AT storsteinanettemargrethe comparingtheimpactofupfrontradiosurgeryversusexpectationinvestibularschwannomathevrexstudyprotocolforarandomisedobserverblinded4yearparallelgroupsinglecentresuperioritystudy
AT grunerelirenate comparingtheimpactofupfrontradiosurgeryversusexpectationinvestibularschwannomathevrexstudyprotocolforarandomisedobserverblinded4yearparallelgroupsinglecentresuperioritystudy
AT lundjohansenmorten comparingtheimpactofupfrontradiosurgeryversusexpectationinvestibularschwannomathevrexstudyprotocolforarandomisedobserverblinded4yearparallelgroupsinglecentresuperioritystudy