Cargando…
Identifying gaps in COVID-19 health equity data reporting in Canada using a scorecard approach
OBJECTIVE: To assess health equity-oriented COVID-19 reporting across Canadian provinces and territories, using a scorecard approach. METHODS: A scan was performed of provincial and territorial reporting of five data elements (cumulative totals of tests, cases, hospitalizations, deaths, and populati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7978170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33742310 http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/s41997-021-00496-6 |
_version_ | 1783667168003489792 |
---|---|
author | Blair, Alexandra Warsame, Kahiye Naik, Harsh Byrne, Walter Parnia, Abtin Siddiqi, Arjumand |
author_facet | Blair, Alexandra Warsame, Kahiye Naik, Harsh Byrne, Walter Parnia, Abtin Siddiqi, Arjumand |
author_sort | Blair, Alexandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess health equity-oriented COVID-19 reporting across Canadian provinces and territories, using a scorecard approach. METHODS: A scan was performed of provincial and territorial reporting of five data elements (cumulative totals of tests, cases, hospitalizations, deaths, and population size) across three units of aggregation (province or territory level, health regions, and local areas) (15 “overall” indicators), and for four vulnerable settings (long-term care and detention facilities, schools, and homeless shelters) and eight social markers (age, sex, immigration status, race/ethnicity, healthcare worker status, occupational sector, income, and education) (180 “equity-related” indicators) as of December 31, 2020. Per indicator, one point was awarded if case-delimited data were released, 0.7 points if only summary statistics were reported, and 0 if neither was provided. Results were presented using a scorecard approach. RESULTS: Overall, information was more complete for cases and deaths than for tests, hospitalizations, and population size denominators needed for rate estimation. Information provided on jurisdictions and their regions, overall, tended to be more available (average score of 58%, “D”) than that for equity-related indicators (average score of 17%, “F”). Only British Columbia, Alberta, and Ontario provided case-delimited data, with Ontario and Alberta providing case information for local areas. No jurisdiction reported on outcomes according to patients’ immigration status, race/ethnicity, income, or education. Though several provinces reported on cases in long-term care facilities, only Ontario and Quebec provided detailed information for detention facilities and schools, and only Ontario reported on cases within homeless shelters and across occupational sectors. CONCLUSION: One year into the pandemic, socially stratified reporting for COVID-19 outcomes remains sparse in Canada. However, several “best practices” in health equity-oriented reporting were observed and set a relevant precedent for all jurisdictions to follow for this pandemic and future ones. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.17269/s41997-021-00496-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7978170 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79781702021-03-23 Identifying gaps in COVID-19 health equity data reporting in Canada using a scorecard approach Blair, Alexandra Warsame, Kahiye Naik, Harsh Byrne, Walter Parnia, Abtin Siddiqi, Arjumand Can J Public Health Special Section on COVID-19: Quantitative Research OBJECTIVE: To assess health equity-oriented COVID-19 reporting across Canadian provinces and territories, using a scorecard approach. METHODS: A scan was performed of provincial and territorial reporting of five data elements (cumulative totals of tests, cases, hospitalizations, deaths, and population size) across three units of aggregation (province or territory level, health regions, and local areas) (15 “overall” indicators), and for four vulnerable settings (long-term care and detention facilities, schools, and homeless shelters) and eight social markers (age, sex, immigration status, race/ethnicity, healthcare worker status, occupational sector, income, and education) (180 “equity-related” indicators) as of December 31, 2020. Per indicator, one point was awarded if case-delimited data were released, 0.7 points if only summary statistics were reported, and 0 if neither was provided. Results were presented using a scorecard approach. RESULTS: Overall, information was more complete for cases and deaths than for tests, hospitalizations, and population size denominators needed for rate estimation. Information provided on jurisdictions and their regions, overall, tended to be more available (average score of 58%, “D”) than that for equity-related indicators (average score of 17%, “F”). Only British Columbia, Alberta, and Ontario provided case-delimited data, with Ontario and Alberta providing case information for local areas. No jurisdiction reported on outcomes according to patients’ immigration status, race/ethnicity, income, or education. Though several provinces reported on cases in long-term care facilities, only Ontario and Quebec provided detailed information for detention facilities and schools, and only Ontario reported on cases within homeless shelters and across occupational sectors. CONCLUSION: One year into the pandemic, socially stratified reporting for COVID-19 outcomes remains sparse in Canada. However, several “best practices” in health equity-oriented reporting were observed and set a relevant precedent for all jurisdictions to follow for this pandemic and future ones. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.17269/s41997-021-00496-6. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7978170/ /pubmed/33742310 http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/s41997-021-00496-6 Text en © The Canadian Public Health Association 2021 |
spellingShingle | Special Section on COVID-19: Quantitative Research Blair, Alexandra Warsame, Kahiye Naik, Harsh Byrne, Walter Parnia, Abtin Siddiqi, Arjumand Identifying gaps in COVID-19 health equity data reporting in Canada using a scorecard approach |
title | Identifying gaps in COVID-19 health equity data reporting in Canada using a scorecard approach |
title_full | Identifying gaps in COVID-19 health equity data reporting in Canada using a scorecard approach |
title_fullStr | Identifying gaps in COVID-19 health equity data reporting in Canada using a scorecard approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying gaps in COVID-19 health equity data reporting in Canada using a scorecard approach |
title_short | Identifying gaps in COVID-19 health equity data reporting in Canada using a scorecard approach |
title_sort | identifying gaps in covid-19 health equity data reporting in canada using a scorecard approach |
topic | Special Section on COVID-19: Quantitative Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7978170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33742310 http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/s41997-021-00496-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blairalexandra identifyinggapsincovid19healthequitydatareportingincanadausingascorecardapproach AT warsamekahiye identifyinggapsincovid19healthequitydatareportingincanadausingascorecardapproach AT naikharsh identifyinggapsincovid19healthequitydatareportingincanadausingascorecardapproach AT byrnewalter identifyinggapsincovid19healthequitydatareportingincanadausingascorecardapproach AT parniaabtin identifyinggapsincovid19healthequitydatareportingincanadausingascorecardapproach AT siddiqiarjumand identifyinggapsincovid19healthequitydatareportingincanadausingascorecardapproach |