Cargando…

Identifying gaps in COVID-19 health equity data reporting in Canada using a scorecard approach

OBJECTIVE: To assess health equity-oriented COVID-19 reporting across Canadian provinces and territories, using a scorecard approach. METHODS: A scan was performed of provincial and territorial reporting of five data elements (cumulative totals of tests, cases, hospitalizations, deaths, and populati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blair, Alexandra, Warsame, Kahiye, Naik, Harsh, Byrne, Walter, Parnia, Abtin, Siddiqi, Arjumand
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7978170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33742310
http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/s41997-021-00496-6
_version_ 1783667168003489792
author Blair, Alexandra
Warsame, Kahiye
Naik, Harsh
Byrne, Walter
Parnia, Abtin
Siddiqi, Arjumand
author_facet Blair, Alexandra
Warsame, Kahiye
Naik, Harsh
Byrne, Walter
Parnia, Abtin
Siddiqi, Arjumand
author_sort Blair, Alexandra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess health equity-oriented COVID-19 reporting across Canadian provinces and territories, using a scorecard approach. METHODS: A scan was performed of provincial and territorial reporting of five data elements (cumulative totals of tests, cases, hospitalizations, deaths, and population size) across three units of aggregation (province or territory level, health regions, and local areas) (15 “overall” indicators), and for four vulnerable settings (long-term care and detention facilities, schools, and homeless shelters) and eight social markers (age, sex, immigration status, race/ethnicity, healthcare worker status, occupational sector, income, and education) (180 “equity-related” indicators) as of December 31, 2020. Per indicator, one point was awarded if case-delimited data were released, 0.7 points if only summary statistics were reported, and 0 if neither was provided. Results were presented using a scorecard approach. RESULTS: Overall, information was more complete for cases and deaths than for tests, hospitalizations, and population size denominators needed for rate estimation. Information provided on jurisdictions and their regions, overall, tended to be more available (average score of 58%, “D”) than that for equity-related indicators (average score of 17%, “F”). Only British Columbia, Alberta, and Ontario provided case-delimited data, with Ontario and Alberta providing case information for local areas. No jurisdiction reported on outcomes according to patients’ immigration status, race/ethnicity, income, or education. Though several provinces reported on cases in long-term care facilities, only Ontario and Quebec provided detailed information for detention facilities and schools, and only Ontario reported on cases within homeless shelters and across occupational sectors. CONCLUSION: One year into the pandemic, socially stratified reporting for COVID-19 outcomes remains sparse in Canada. However, several “best practices” in health equity-oriented reporting were observed and set a relevant precedent for all jurisdictions to follow for this pandemic and future ones. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.17269/s41997-021-00496-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7978170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79781702021-03-23 Identifying gaps in COVID-19 health equity data reporting in Canada using a scorecard approach Blair, Alexandra Warsame, Kahiye Naik, Harsh Byrne, Walter Parnia, Abtin Siddiqi, Arjumand Can J Public Health Special Section on COVID-19: Quantitative Research OBJECTIVE: To assess health equity-oriented COVID-19 reporting across Canadian provinces and territories, using a scorecard approach. METHODS: A scan was performed of provincial and territorial reporting of five data elements (cumulative totals of tests, cases, hospitalizations, deaths, and population size) across three units of aggregation (province or territory level, health regions, and local areas) (15 “overall” indicators), and for four vulnerable settings (long-term care and detention facilities, schools, and homeless shelters) and eight social markers (age, sex, immigration status, race/ethnicity, healthcare worker status, occupational sector, income, and education) (180 “equity-related” indicators) as of December 31, 2020. Per indicator, one point was awarded if case-delimited data were released, 0.7 points if only summary statistics were reported, and 0 if neither was provided. Results were presented using a scorecard approach. RESULTS: Overall, information was more complete for cases and deaths than for tests, hospitalizations, and population size denominators needed for rate estimation. Information provided on jurisdictions and their regions, overall, tended to be more available (average score of 58%, “D”) than that for equity-related indicators (average score of 17%, “F”). Only British Columbia, Alberta, and Ontario provided case-delimited data, with Ontario and Alberta providing case information for local areas. No jurisdiction reported on outcomes according to patients’ immigration status, race/ethnicity, income, or education. Though several provinces reported on cases in long-term care facilities, only Ontario and Quebec provided detailed information for detention facilities and schools, and only Ontario reported on cases within homeless shelters and across occupational sectors. CONCLUSION: One year into the pandemic, socially stratified reporting for COVID-19 outcomes remains sparse in Canada. However, several “best practices” in health equity-oriented reporting were observed and set a relevant precedent for all jurisdictions to follow for this pandemic and future ones. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.17269/s41997-021-00496-6. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7978170/ /pubmed/33742310 http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/s41997-021-00496-6 Text en © The Canadian Public Health Association 2021
spellingShingle Special Section on COVID-19: Quantitative Research
Blair, Alexandra
Warsame, Kahiye
Naik, Harsh
Byrne, Walter
Parnia, Abtin
Siddiqi, Arjumand
Identifying gaps in COVID-19 health equity data reporting in Canada using a scorecard approach
title Identifying gaps in COVID-19 health equity data reporting in Canada using a scorecard approach
title_full Identifying gaps in COVID-19 health equity data reporting in Canada using a scorecard approach
title_fullStr Identifying gaps in COVID-19 health equity data reporting in Canada using a scorecard approach
title_full_unstemmed Identifying gaps in COVID-19 health equity data reporting in Canada using a scorecard approach
title_short Identifying gaps in COVID-19 health equity data reporting in Canada using a scorecard approach
title_sort identifying gaps in covid-19 health equity data reporting in canada using a scorecard approach
topic Special Section on COVID-19: Quantitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7978170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33742310
http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/s41997-021-00496-6
work_keys_str_mv AT blairalexandra identifyinggapsincovid19healthequitydatareportingincanadausingascorecardapproach
AT warsamekahiye identifyinggapsincovid19healthequitydatareportingincanadausingascorecardapproach
AT naikharsh identifyinggapsincovid19healthequitydatareportingincanadausingascorecardapproach
AT byrnewalter identifyinggapsincovid19healthequitydatareportingincanadausingascorecardapproach
AT parniaabtin identifyinggapsincovid19healthequitydatareportingincanadausingascorecardapproach
AT siddiqiarjumand identifyinggapsincovid19healthequitydatareportingincanadausingascorecardapproach