Cargando…

Electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ECASS): a feasibility study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a definitive trial in primary care of electronic clinical decision support (eCDS) for possible oesophago-gastric (O-G) cancer. DESIGN AND SETTING: Feasibility study in 42 general practices in two regions of England, cluster randomised controlled trial desig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rubin, Greg, Walter, Fiona M, Emery, Jon, Hamilton, Willie, Hoare, Zoe, Howse, Jenny, Nixon, Catherine, Srivastava, Tushar, Thomas, Chloe, Ukoumunne, Obioha C, Usher-Smith, Juliet A, Whyte, Sophie, Neal, Richard D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7978254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33737422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041795
_version_ 1783667172939137024
author Rubin, Greg
Walter, Fiona M
Emery, Jon
Hamilton, Willie
Hoare, Zoe
Howse, Jenny
Nixon, Catherine
Srivastava, Tushar
Thomas, Chloe
Ukoumunne, Obioha C
Usher-Smith, Juliet A
Whyte, Sophie
Neal, Richard D
author_facet Rubin, Greg
Walter, Fiona M
Emery, Jon
Hamilton, Willie
Hoare, Zoe
Howse, Jenny
Nixon, Catherine
Srivastava, Tushar
Thomas, Chloe
Ukoumunne, Obioha C
Usher-Smith, Juliet A
Whyte, Sophie
Neal, Richard D
author_sort Rubin, Greg
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a definitive trial in primary care of electronic clinical decision support (eCDS) for possible oesophago-gastric (O-G) cancer. DESIGN AND SETTING: Feasibility study in 42 general practices in two regions of England, cluster randomised controlled trial design without blinding, nested qualitative and health economic evaluation. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 55 years or older, presenting to their general practitioner (GP) with symptoms associated with O-G cancer. 530 patients (mean age 68 years, 58% female) participated. INTERVENTION: Practices randomised 1:1 to usual care (control) or to receive a previously piloted eCDS tool for suspected cancer (intervention), for use at the discretion of the GPs, supported by a theory-based implementation package and ongoing support. We conducted semistructured interviews with GPs in intervention practices. Recruitment lasted 22 months. OUTCOMES: Patient participation rate, use of eCDS, referrals and route to diagnosis, O-G cancer diagnoses; acceptability to GPs; cost-effectiveness. Participants followed up 6 months after index encounter. RESULTS: From control and intervention practices, we screened 3841 and 1303 patients, respectively; 1189 and 434 were eligible, 392 and 138 consented to participate. Ten patients (1.9%) had O-G cancer. eCDS was used eight times in total by five unique users. GPs experienced interoperability problems between the eCDS tool and their clinical system and also found it did not fit with their workflow. Unexpected restrictions on software installation caused major problems with implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The conduct of this study was hampered by technical limitations not evident during an earlier pilot of the eCDS tool, and by regulatory controls on software installation introduced by primary care trusts early in the study. This eCDS tool needed to integrate better with clinical workflow; even then, its use for suspected cancer may be infrequent. Any definitive trial of eCDS for cancer diagnosis should only proceed after addressing these constraints. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN125595588.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7978254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79782542021-03-30 Electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ECASS): a feasibility study Rubin, Greg Walter, Fiona M Emery, Jon Hamilton, Willie Hoare, Zoe Howse, Jenny Nixon, Catherine Srivastava, Tushar Thomas, Chloe Ukoumunne, Obioha C Usher-Smith, Juliet A Whyte, Sophie Neal, Richard D BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a definitive trial in primary care of electronic clinical decision support (eCDS) for possible oesophago-gastric (O-G) cancer. DESIGN AND SETTING: Feasibility study in 42 general practices in two regions of England, cluster randomised controlled trial design without blinding, nested qualitative and health economic evaluation. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 55 years or older, presenting to their general practitioner (GP) with symptoms associated with O-G cancer. 530 patients (mean age 68 years, 58% female) participated. INTERVENTION: Practices randomised 1:1 to usual care (control) or to receive a previously piloted eCDS tool for suspected cancer (intervention), for use at the discretion of the GPs, supported by a theory-based implementation package and ongoing support. We conducted semistructured interviews with GPs in intervention practices. Recruitment lasted 22 months. OUTCOMES: Patient participation rate, use of eCDS, referrals and route to diagnosis, O-G cancer diagnoses; acceptability to GPs; cost-effectiveness. Participants followed up 6 months after index encounter. RESULTS: From control and intervention practices, we screened 3841 and 1303 patients, respectively; 1189 and 434 were eligible, 392 and 138 consented to participate. Ten patients (1.9%) had O-G cancer. eCDS was used eight times in total by five unique users. GPs experienced interoperability problems between the eCDS tool and their clinical system and also found it did not fit with their workflow. Unexpected restrictions on software installation caused major problems with implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The conduct of this study was hampered by technical limitations not evident during an earlier pilot of the eCDS tool, and by regulatory controls on software installation introduced by primary care trusts early in the study. This eCDS tool needed to integrate better with clinical workflow; even then, its use for suspected cancer may be infrequent. Any definitive trial of eCDS for cancer diagnosis should only proceed after addressing these constraints. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN125595588. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7978254/ /pubmed/33737422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041795 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Rubin, Greg
Walter, Fiona M
Emery, Jon
Hamilton, Willie
Hoare, Zoe
Howse, Jenny
Nixon, Catherine
Srivastava, Tushar
Thomas, Chloe
Ukoumunne, Obioha C
Usher-Smith, Juliet A
Whyte, Sophie
Neal, Richard D
Electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ECASS): a feasibility study
title Electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ECASS): a feasibility study
title_full Electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ECASS): a feasibility study
title_fullStr Electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ECASS): a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ECASS): a feasibility study
title_short Electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ECASS): a feasibility study
title_sort electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ecass): a feasibility study
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7978254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33737422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041795
work_keys_str_mv AT rubingreg electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy
AT walterfionam electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy
AT emeryjon electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy
AT hamiltonwillie electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy
AT hoarezoe electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy
AT howsejenny electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy
AT nixoncatherine electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy
AT srivastavatushar electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy
AT thomaschloe electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy
AT ukoumunneobiohac electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy
AT ushersmithjulieta electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy
AT whytesophie electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy
AT nealrichardd electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy