Cargando…
Electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ECASS): a feasibility study
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a definitive trial in primary care of electronic clinical decision support (eCDS) for possible oesophago-gastric (O-G) cancer. DESIGN AND SETTING: Feasibility study in 42 general practices in two regions of England, cluster randomised controlled trial desig...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7978254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33737422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041795 |
_version_ | 1783667172939137024 |
---|---|
author | Rubin, Greg Walter, Fiona M Emery, Jon Hamilton, Willie Hoare, Zoe Howse, Jenny Nixon, Catherine Srivastava, Tushar Thomas, Chloe Ukoumunne, Obioha C Usher-Smith, Juliet A Whyte, Sophie Neal, Richard D |
author_facet | Rubin, Greg Walter, Fiona M Emery, Jon Hamilton, Willie Hoare, Zoe Howse, Jenny Nixon, Catherine Srivastava, Tushar Thomas, Chloe Ukoumunne, Obioha C Usher-Smith, Juliet A Whyte, Sophie Neal, Richard D |
author_sort | Rubin, Greg |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a definitive trial in primary care of electronic clinical decision support (eCDS) for possible oesophago-gastric (O-G) cancer. DESIGN AND SETTING: Feasibility study in 42 general practices in two regions of England, cluster randomised controlled trial design without blinding, nested qualitative and health economic evaluation. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 55 years or older, presenting to their general practitioner (GP) with symptoms associated with O-G cancer. 530 patients (mean age 68 years, 58% female) participated. INTERVENTION: Practices randomised 1:1 to usual care (control) or to receive a previously piloted eCDS tool for suspected cancer (intervention), for use at the discretion of the GPs, supported by a theory-based implementation package and ongoing support. We conducted semistructured interviews with GPs in intervention practices. Recruitment lasted 22 months. OUTCOMES: Patient participation rate, use of eCDS, referrals and route to diagnosis, O-G cancer diagnoses; acceptability to GPs; cost-effectiveness. Participants followed up 6 months after index encounter. RESULTS: From control and intervention practices, we screened 3841 and 1303 patients, respectively; 1189 and 434 were eligible, 392 and 138 consented to participate. Ten patients (1.9%) had O-G cancer. eCDS was used eight times in total by five unique users. GPs experienced interoperability problems between the eCDS tool and their clinical system and also found it did not fit with their workflow. Unexpected restrictions on software installation caused major problems with implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The conduct of this study was hampered by technical limitations not evident during an earlier pilot of the eCDS tool, and by regulatory controls on software installation introduced by primary care trusts early in the study. This eCDS tool needed to integrate better with clinical workflow; even then, its use for suspected cancer may be infrequent. Any definitive trial of eCDS for cancer diagnosis should only proceed after addressing these constraints. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN125595588. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7978254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79782542021-03-30 Electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ECASS): a feasibility study Rubin, Greg Walter, Fiona M Emery, Jon Hamilton, Willie Hoare, Zoe Howse, Jenny Nixon, Catherine Srivastava, Tushar Thomas, Chloe Ukoumunne, Obioha C Usher-Smith, Juliet A Whyte, Sophie Neal, Richard D BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a definitive trial in primary care of electronic clinical decision support (eCDS) for possible oesophago-gastric (O-G) cancer. DESIGN AND SETTING: Feasibility study in 42 general practices in two regions of England, cluster randomised controlled trial design without blinding, nested qualitative and health economic evaluation. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 55 years or older, presenting to their general practitioner (GP) with symptoms associated with O-G cancer. 530 patients (mean age 68 years, 58% female) participated. INTERVENTION: Practices randomised 1:1 to usual care (control) or to receive a previously piloted eCDS tool for suspected cancer (intervention), for use at the discretion of the GPs, supported by a theory-based implementation package and ongoing support. We conducted semistructured interviews with GPs in intervention practices. Recruitment lasted 22 months. OUTCOMES: Patient participation rate, use of eCDS, referrals and route to diagnosis, O-G cancer diagnoses; acceptability to GPs; cost-effectiveness. Participants followed up 6 months after index encounter. RESULTS: From control and intervention practices, we screened 3841 and 1303 patients, respectively; 1189 and 434 were eligible, 392 and 138 consented to participate. Ten patients (1.9%) had O-G cancer. eCDS was used eight times in total by five unique users. GPs experienced interoperability problems between the eCDS tool and their clinical system and also found it did not fit with their workflow. Unexpected restrictions on software installation caused major problems with implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The conduct of this study was hampered by technical limitations not evident during an earlier pilot of the eCDS tool, and by regulatory controls on software installation introduced by primary care trusts early in the study. This eCDS tool needed to integrate better with clinical workflow; even then, its use for suspected cancer may be infrequent. Any definitive trial of eCDS for cancer diagnosis should only proceed after addressing these constraints. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN125595588. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7978254/ /pubmed/33737422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041795 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Rubin, Greg Walter, Fiona M Emery, Jon Hamilton, Willie Hoare, Zoe Howse, Jenny Nixon, Catherine Srivastava, Tushar Thomas, Chloe Ukoumunne, Obioha C Usher-Smith, Juliet A Whyte, Sophie Neal, Richard D Electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ECASS): a feasibility study |
title | Electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ECASS): a feasibility study |
title_full | Electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ECASS): a feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ECASS): a feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ECASS): a feasibility study |
title_short | Electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ECASS): a feasibility study |
title_sort | electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ecass): a feasibility study |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7978254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33737422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041795 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rubingreg electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy AT walterfionam electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy AT emeryjon electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy AT hamiltonwillie electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy AT hoarezoe electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy AT howsejenny electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy AT nixoncatherine electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy AT srivastavatushar electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy AT thomaschloe electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy AT ukoumunneobiohac electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy AT ushersmithjulieta electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy AT whytesophie electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy AT nealrichardd electronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoolforassessingstomachsymptomsinprimarycareecassafeasibilitystudy |