Cargando…

Fast progression in non–small cell lung cancer: results from the randomized phase III OAK study evaluating second-line atezolizumab versus docetaxel

BACKGROUND: Treatment-induced accelerated tumor growth is a progression pattern reported with immune checkpoint inhibitors that has never been evaluated in randomized phase III studies because it requires two pretreatment scans. This study aimed to develop clinically relevant and applicable criteria...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gandara, David, Reck, Martin, Moro-Sibilot, Denis, Mazieres, Julien, Gadgeel, Shirish, Morris, Stefanie, Cardona, Andres, Mendus, Diana, Ballinger, Marcus, Rittmeyer, Achim, Peters, Solange
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7978260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33737340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001882
_version_ 1783667174113542144
author Gandara, David
Reck, Martin
Moro-Sibilot, Denis
Mazieres, Julien
Gadgeel, Shirish
Morris, Stefanie
Cardona, Andres
Mendus, Diana
Ballinger, Marcus
Rittmeyer, Achim
Peters, Solange
author_facet Gandara, David
Reck, Martin
Moro-Sibilot, Denis
Mazieres, Julien
Gadgeel, Shirish
Morris, Stefanie
Cardona, Andres
Mendus, Diana
Ballinger, Marcus
Rittmeyer, Achim
Peters, Solange
author_sort Gandara, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treatment-induced accelerated tumor growth is a progression pattern reported with immune checkpoint inhibitors that has never been evaluated in randomized phase III studies because it requires two pretreatment scans. This study aimed to develop clinically relevant and applicable criteria for fast progression (FP), incorporating tumor growth kinetics and early death from disease progression to analyze data from the randomized phase III OAK study. METHODS: The OAK study evaluated the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab versus docetaxel as second-line or third-line treatment for stage IIIb/IV non–small cell lung cancer. FP rates and associated baseline factors were analyzed. FP was defined as either a ≥50% increase in the sum of largest diameters (SLDs) within 6 weeks of treatment initiation or death due to cancer progression within 12 weeks (absent post-baseline scan). RESULTS: Forty-two of 421 patients (10%) receiving atezolizumab and 37 of 402 (9%) receiving docetaxel had FP. Twenty patients with FP (48%) receiving atezolizumab versus 12 (30%) receiving docetaxel had a ≥50% SLD increase within 6 weeks. FP was significantly associated with an ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status of 1 (vs 0), ≥3 metastatic sites at baseline, and failure of preceding first-line treatment within 6 months, but not with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 or tumor mutational burden. Overall survival in patients with FP and a ≥50% SLD increase at week 6 was similar with atezolizumab and docetaxel (unstratified HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.41 to 1.92)). CONCLUSIONS: FP rates were similar with atezolizumab and docetaxel in the OAK study, suggesting that FP may not be unique to checkpoint inhibitors, although the underlying mechanisms may differ from those of chemotherapy. Applying the FP criteria to other phase III checkpoint inhibitor trials may further elucidate the risk factors for FP. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02008227.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7978260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79782602021-03-30 Fast progression in non–small cell lung cancer: results from the randomized phase III OAK study evaluating second-line atezolizumab versus docetaxel Gandara, David Reck, Martin Moro-Sibilot, Denis Mazieres, Julien Gadgeel, Shirish Morris, Stefanie Cardona, Andres Mendus, Diana Ballinger, Marcus Rittmeyer, Achim Peters, Solange J Immunother Cancer Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy BACKGROUND: Treatment-induced accelerated tumor growth is a progression pattern reported with immune checkpoint inhibitors that has never been evaluated in randomized phase III studies because it requires two pretreatment scans. This study aimed to develop clinically relevant and applicable criteria for fast progression (FP), incorporating tumor growth kinetics and early death from disease progression to analyze data from the randomized phase III OAK study. METHODS: The OAK study evaluated the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab versus docetaxel as second-line or third-line treatment for stage IIIb/IV non–small cell lung cancer. FP rates and associated baseline factors were analyzed. FP was defined as either a ≥50% increase in the sum of largest diameters (SLDs) within 6 weeks of treatment initiation or death due to cancer progression within 12 weeks (absent post-baseline scan). RESULTS: Forty-two of 421 patients (10%) receiving atezolizumab and 37 of 402 (9%) receiving docetaxel had FP. Twenty patients with FP (48%) receiving atezolizumab versus 12 (30%) receiving docetaxel had a ≥50% SLD increase within 6 weeks. FP was significantly associated with an ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status of 1 (vs 0), ≥3 metastatic sites at baseline, and failure of preceding first-line treatment within 6 months, but not with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 or tumor mutational burden. Overall survival in patients with FP and a ≥50% SLD increase at week 6 was similar with atezolizumab and docetaxel (unstratified HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.41 to 1.92)). CONCLUSIONS: FP rates were similar with atezolizumab and docetaxel in the OAK study, suggesting that FP may not be unique to checkpoint inhibitors, although the underlying mechanisms may differ from those of chemotherapy. Applying the FP criteria to other phase III checkpoint inhibitor trials may further elucidate the risk factors for FP. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02008227. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7978260/ /pubmed/33737340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001882 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy
Gandara, David
Reck, Martin
Moro-Sibilot, Denis
Mazieres, Julien
Gadgeel, Shirish
Morris, Stefanie
Cardona, Andres
Mendus, Diana
Ballinger, Marcus
Rittmeyer, Achim
Peters, Solange
Fast progression in non–small cell lung cancer: results from the randomized phase III OAK study evaluating second-line atezolizumab versus docetaxel
title Fast progression in non–small cell lung cancer: results from the randomized phase III OAK study evaluating second-line atezolizumab versus docetaxel
title_full Fast progression in non–small cell lung cancer: results from the randomized phase III OAK study evaluating second-line atezolizumab versus docetaxel
title_fullStr Fast progression in non–small cell lung cancer: results from the randomized phase III OAK study evaluating second-line atezolizumab versus docetaxel
title_full_unstemmed Fast progression in non–small cell lung cancer: results from the randomized phase III OAK study evaluating second-line atezolizumab versus docetaxel
title_short Fast progression in non–small cell lung cancer: results from the randomized phase III OAK study evaluating second-line atezolizumab versus docetaxel
title_sort fast progression in non–small cell lung cancer: results from the randomized phase iii oak study evaluating second-line atezolizumab versus docetaxel
topic Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7978260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33737340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001882
work_keys_str_mv AT gandaradavid fastprogressioninnonsmallcelllungcancerresultsfromtherandomizedphaseiiioakstudyevaluatingsecondlineatezolizumabversusdocetaxel
AT reckmartin fastprogressioninnonsmallcelllungcancerresultsfromtherandomizedphaseiiioakstudyevaluatingsecondlineatezolizumabversusdocetaxel
AT morosibilotdenis fastprogressioninnonsmallcelllungcancerresultsfromtherandomizedphaseiiioakstudyevaluatingsecondlineatezolizumabversusdocetaxel
AT mazieresjulien fastprogressioninnonsmallcelllungcancerresultsfromtherandomizedphaseiiioakstudyevaluatingsecondlineatezolizumabversusdocetaxel
AT gadgeelshirish fastprogressioninnonsmallcelllungcancerresultsfromtherandomizedphaseiiioakstudyevaluatingsecondlineatezolizumabversusdocetaxel
AT morrisstefanie fastprogressioninnonsmallcelllungcancerresultsfromtherandomizedphaseiiioakstudyevaluatingsecondlineatezolizumabversusdocetaxel
AT cardonaandres fastprogressioninnonsmallcelllungcancerresultsfromtherandomizedphaseiiioakstudyevaluatingsecondlineatezolizumabversusdocetaxel
AT mendusdiana fastprogressioninnonsmallcelllungcancerresultsfromtherandomizedphaseiiioakstudyevaluatingsecondlineatezolizumabversusdocetaxel
AT ballingermarcus fastprogressioninnonsmallcelllungcancerresultsfromtherandomizedphaseiiioakstudyevaluatingsecondlineatezolizumabversusdocetaxel
AT rittmeyerachim fastprogressioninnonsmallcelllungcancerresultsfromtherandomizedphaseiiioakstudyevaluatingsecondlineatezolizumabversusdocetaxel
AT peterssolange fastprogressioninnonsmallcelllungcancerresultsfromtherandomizedphaseiiioakstudyevaluatingsecondlineatezolizumabversusdocetaxel