Cargando…

A systematic review on improving implementation of the revitalised integrated disease surveillance and response system in the African region: A health workers’ perspective

BACKGROUND: The revised integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) guidelines adopted by African member states in 2010 aimed at strengthening surveillance systems critical capacities. Milestones achieved through IDSR strategy implementation prior to adopting the revised guidelines are well...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ng’etich, Arthur K. S., Voyi, Kuku, Kirinyet, Ruth C., Mutero, Clifford M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7978283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33740021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248998
_version_ 1783667179003052032
author Ng’etich, Arthur K. S.
Voyi, Kuku
Kirinyet, Ruth C.
Mutero, Clifford M.
author_facet Ng’etich, Arthur K. S.
Voyi, Kuku
Kirinyet, Ruth C.
Mutero, Clifford M.
author_sort Ng’etich, Arthur K. S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The revised integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) guidelines adopted by African member states in 2010 aimed at strengthening surveillance systems critical capacities. Milestones achieved through IDSR strategy implementation prior to adopting the revised guidelines are well documented; however, there is a dearth of knowledge on the progress made post-adoption. This study aimed to review key recommendations resulting from surveillance assessment studies to improve implementation of the revitalised IDSR system in the African region based on health workers’ perspectives. The review focused on literature published between 2010 and 2019 post-adopting the revised IDSR guidelines in the African region. METHODS: A systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science and Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature was conducted. In addition, manual reference searches and grey literature searches using World Health Organisation Library and Information Networks for Knowledge databases were undertaken. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement checklist for systematic reviews was utilised for the review process. RESULTS: Thirty assessment studies met the inclusion criteria. IDSR implementation under the revised guidelines could be improved considerably bearing in mind critical findings and recommendations emanating from the reviewed surveillance assessment studies. Key recommendations alluded to provision of laboratory facilities and improved specimen handling, provision of reporting forms and improved reporting quality, surveillance data accuracy and quality, improved knowledge and surveillance system performance, utilisation of up-to-date information and surveillance system strengthening, provision of resources, enhanced reporting timeliness and completeness, adopting alternative surveillance strategies and conducting further research to improve surveillance functions. CONCLUSION: Recommendations on strengthening IDSR implementation in the African region post-adopting the revised guidelines mainly identify surveillance functions focused on reporting, feedback, training, supervision, timeliness and completeness of the surveillance system as aspects requiring policy refinement. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42019124108.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7978283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79782832021-03-30 A systematic review on improving implementation of the revitalised integrated disease surveillance and response system in the African region: A health workers’ perspective Ng’etich, Arthur K. S. Voyi, Kuku Kirinyet, Ruth C. Mutero, Clifford M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The revised integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) guidelines adopted by African member states in 2010 aimed at strengthening surveillance systems critical capacities. Milestones achieved through IDSR strategy implementation prior to adopting the revised guidelines are well documented; however, there is a dearth of knowledge on the progress made post-adoption. This study aimed to review key recommendations resulting from surveillance assessment studies to improve implementation of the revitalised IDSR system in the African region based on health workers’ perspectives. The review focused on literature published between 2010 and 2019 post-adopting the revised IDSR guidelines in the African region. METHODS: A systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science and Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature was conducted. In addition, manual reference searches and grey literature searches using World Health Organisation Library and Information Networks for Knowledge databases were undertaken. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement checklist for systematic reviews was utilised for the review process. RESULTS: Thirty assessment studies met the inclusion criteria. IDSR implementation under the revised guidelines could be improved considerably bearing in mind critical findings and recommendations emanating from the reviewed surveillance assessment studies. Key recommendations alluded to provision of laboratory facilities and improved specimen handling, provision of reporting forms and improved reporting quality, surveillance data accuracy and quality, improved knowledge and surveillance system performance, utilisation of up-to-date information and surveillance system strengthening, provision of resources, enhanced reporting timeliness and completeness, adopting alternative surveillance strategies and conducting further research to improve surveillance functions. CONCLUSION: Recommendations on strengthening IDSR implementation in the African region post-adopting the revised guidelines mainly identify surveillance functions focused on reporting, feedback, training, supervision, timeliness and completeness of the surveillance system as aspects requiring policy refinement. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42019124108. Public Library of Science 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7978283/ /pubmed/33740021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248998 Text en © 2021 Ng’etich et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ng’etich, Arthur K. S.
Voyi, Kuku
Kirinyet, Ruth C.
Mutero, Clifford M.
A systematic review on improving implementation of the revitalised integrated disease surveillance and response system in the African region: A health workers’ perspective
title A systematic review on improving implementation of the revitalised integrated disease surveillance and response system in the African region: A health workers’ perspective
title_full A systematic review on improving implementation of the revitalised integrated disease surveillance and response system in the African region: A health workers’ perspective
title_fullStr A systematic review on improving implementation of the revitalised integrated disease surveillance and response system in the African region: A health workers’ perspective
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review on improving implementation of the revitalised integrated disease surveillance and response system in the African region: A health workers’ perspective
title_short A systematic review on improving implementation of the revitalised integrated disease surveillance and response system in the African region: A health workers’ perspective
title_sort systematic review on improving implementation of the revitalised integrated disease surveillance and response system in the african region: a health workers’ perspective
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7978283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33740021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248998
work_keys_str_mv AT ngeticharthurks asystematicreviewonimprovingimplementationoftherevitalisedintegrateddiseasesurveillanceandresponsesystemintheafricanregionahealthworkersperspective
AT voyikuku asystematicreviewonimprovingimplementationoftherevitalisedintegrateddiseasesurveillanceandresponsesystemintheafricanregionahealthworkersperspective
AT kirinyetruthc asystematicreviewonimprovingimplementationoftherevitalisedintegrateddiseasesurveillanceandresponsesystemintheafricanregionahealthworkersperspective
AT muterocliffordm asystematicreviewonimprovingimplementationoftherevitalisedintegrateddiseasesurveillanceandresponsesystemintheafricanregionahealthworkersperspective
AT ngeticharthurks systematicreviewonimprovingimplementationoftherevitalisedintegrateddiseasesurveillanceandresponsesystemintheafricanregionahealthworkersperspective
AT voyikuku systematicreviewonimprovingimplementationoftherevitalisedintegrateddiseasesurveillanceandresponsesystemintheafricanregionahealthworkersperspective
AT kirinyetruthc systematicreviewonimprovingimplementationoftherevitalisedintegrateddiseasesurveillanceandresponsesystemintheafricanregionahealthworkersperspective
AT muterocliffordm systematicreviewonimprovingimplementationoftherevitalisedintegrateddiseasesurveillanceandresponsesystemintheafricanregionahealthworkersperspective