Cargando…
COVID-19 and the Secular Theodicy: On Social Distancing, the Death of God and the Book of Job
In times of great distress, like in the case of the COVID-19 pandemic, people look for relief from the existential threat by searching for some kind of interpretation of the crisis. Some people will look for scapegoats to put the blame on, while others will search for ways by which the crisis can al...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7978868/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65355-2_7 |
_version_ | 1783667231276662784 |
---|---|
author | Bosman, Frank van Wieringen, Archibald |
author_facet | Bosman, Frank van Wieringen, Archibald |
author_sort | Bosman, Frank |
collection | PubMed |
description | In times of great distress, like in the case of the COVID-19 pandemic, people look for relief from the existential threat by searching for some kind of interpretation of the crisis. Some people will look for scapegoats to put the blame on, while others will search for ways by which the crisis can also be perceived as something beneficial. As far as the COVID-19 pandemic goes, earlier this year, media and politicians pointed towards China, where the pandemic started, or to Italy, from where the virus spread over the European continent. Since the beginning of the crisis, we have also been flooded with gurus, motivational speakers, and mindfulness coaches who stimulate us to view the new common as an unexpected but much needed “reboot” of our day-to-day life. Intriguingly enough, these two individual and collective coping strategies are very familiar to those who are acquainted with the Christian philosophical and theological traditions. When confronted with the apparent paradox between the idea of an omnipotent and omnibenevolent deity on the one hand and the experience of everyday pain and suffering on the other hand, Christians have sought for ways to find a satisfactory solution. This is known as theodicy. As the Roman and Christian philosopher Boethius summarized the problem: si Deus, unde malum? “If God exists, wherefrom evil?” |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7978868 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79788682021-03-23 COVID-19 and the Secular Theodicy: On Social Distancing, the Death of God and the Book of Job Bosman, Frank van Wieringen, Archibald The New Common Article In times of great distress, like in the case of the COVID-19 pandemic, people look for relief from the existential threat by searching for some kind of interpretation of the crisis. Some people will look for scapegoats to put the blame on, while others will search for ways by which the crisis can also be perceived as something beneficial. As far as the COVID-19 pandemic goes, earlier this year, media and politicians pointed towards China, where the pandemic started, or to Italy, from where the virus spread over the European continent. Since the beginning of the crisis, we have also been flooded with gurus, motivational speakers, and mindfulness coaches who stimulate us to view the new common as an unexpected but much needed “reboot” of our day-to-day life. Intriguingly enough, these two individual and collective coping strategies are very familiar to those who are acquainted with the Christian philosophical and theological traditions. When confronted with the apparent paradox between the idea of an omnipotent and omnibenevolent deity on the one hand and the experience of everyday pain and suffering on the other hand, Christians have sought for ways to find a satisfactory solution. This is known as theodicy. As the Roman and Christian philosopher Boethius summarized the problem: si Deus, unde malum? “If God exists, wherefrom evil?” 2021-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7978868/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65355-2_7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. |
spellingShingle | Article Bosman, Frank van Wieringen, Archibald COVID-19 and the Secular Theodicy: On Social Distancing, the Death of God and the Book of Job |
title | COVID-19 and the Secular Theodicy: On Social Distancing, the Death of God and the Book of Job |
title_full | COVID-19 and the Secular Theodicy: On Social Distancing, the Death of God and the Book of Job |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 and the Secular Theodicy: On Social Distancing, the Death of God and the Book of Job |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 and the Secular Theodicy: On Social Distancing, the Death of God and the Book of Job |
title_short | COVID-19 and the Secular Theodicy: On Social Distancing, the Death of God and the Book of Job |
title_sort | covid-19 and the secular theodicy: on social distancing, the death of god and the book of job |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7978868/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65355-2_7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bosmanfrank covid19andtheseculartheodicyonsocialdistancingthedeathofgodandthebookofjob AT vanwieringenarchibald covid19andtheseculartheodicyonsocialdistancingthedeathofgodandthebookofjob |