Cargando…
Evaluation of the RSNA and CORADS classifications for COVID-19 on chest computed tomography in the Brazilian population
OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation between the two tomographic classifications for coronavirus disease (COVID-19), COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CORADS) and Radiological Society of North America Expert Consensus Statement on Reporting Chest Computed Tomography (CT) Findings Related to COV...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Medicina / USP
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33787655 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e2476 |
_version_ | 1783667233618132992 |
---|---|
author | Fonseca, Eduardo Kaiser Ururahy Nunes Loureiro, Bruna Melo Coelho Strabelli, Daniel Giunchetti de Farias, Lucas de Pádua Gomes Garcia, José Vitor Rassi Gama, Victor Arcanjo Almeida Ferreira, Lorena Carneiro Chate, Rodrigo Caruso Assunção, Antonildes Nascimento Sawamura, Marcio Valente Yamada Nomura, Cesar Higa |
author_facet | Fonseca, Eduardo Kaiser Ururahy Nunes Loureiro, Bruna Melo Coelho Strabelli, Daniel Giunchetti de Farias, Lucas de Pádua Gomes Garcia, José Vitor Rassi Gama, Victor Arcanjo Almeida Ferreira, Lorena Carneiro Chate, Rodrigo Caruso Assunção, Antonildes Nascimento Sawamura, Marcio Valente Yamada Nomura, Cesar Higa |
author_sort | Fonseca, Eduardo Kaiser Ururahy Nunes |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation between the two tomographic classifications for coronavirus disease (COVID-19), COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CORADS) and Radiological Society of North America Expert Consensus Statement on Reporting Chest Computed Tomography (CT) Findings Related to COVID-19 (RSNA), in the Brazilian population and to assess the agreement between reviewers with different experience levels. METHODS: Chest CT images of patients with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-positive COVID-19 were categorized according to the CORADS and RSNA classifications by radiologists with different levels of experience and who were initially unaware of the RT-PCR results. The inter- and intra-observer concordances for each of the classifications were calculated, as were the concordances between classifications. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included in this study. The RSNA classification showed an almost perfect inter-observer agreement between reviewers with similar experience levels, with a kappa coefficient of 0.892 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.788-0.995). CORADS showed substantial agreement among reviewers with similar experience levels, with a kappa coefficient of 0.642 (95% CI, 0.491-0.793). There was inter-observer variation when comparing less experienced reviewers with more experienced reviewers, with the highest kappa coefficient of 0.396 (95% CI, 0.255-0.588). There was a significant correlation between both classifications, with a Kendall coefficient of 0.899 (p<0.001) and substantial intra-observer agreement for both classifications. CONCLUSION: The RSNA and CORADS classifications showed excellent inter-observer agreement for reviewers with the same level of experience, although the agreement between less experience reviewers and the reviewer with the most experience was only reasonable. Combined analysis of both classifications with the first RT-PCR results did not reveal any false-negative results for detecting COVID-19 in patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7979034 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Faculdade de Medicina / USP |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79790342021-03-21 Evaluation of the RSNA and CORADS classifications for COVID-19 on chest computed tomography in the Brazilian population Fonseca, Eduardo Kaiser Ururahy Nunes Loureiro, Bruna Melo Coelho Strabelli, Daniel Giunchetti de Farias, Lucas de Pádua Gomes Garcia, José Vitor Rassi Gama, Victor Arcanjo Almeida Ferreira, Lorena Carneiro Chate, Rodrigo Caruso Assunção, Antonildes Nascimento Sawamura, Marcio Valente Yamada Nomura, Cesar Higa Clinics (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation between the two tomographic classifications for coronavirus disease (COVID-19), COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CORADS) and Radiological Society of North America Expert Consensus Statement on Reporting Chest Computed Tomography (CT) Findings Related to COVID-19 (RSNA), in the Brazilian population and to assess the agreement between reviewers with different experience levels. METHODS: Chest CT images of patients with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-positive COVID-19 were categorized according to the CORADS and RSNA classifications by radiologists with different levels of experience and who were initially unaware of the RT-PCR results. The inter- and intra-observer concordances for each of the classifications were calculated, as were the concordances between classifications. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included in this study. The RSNA classification showed an almost perfect inter-observer agreement between reviewers with similar experience levels, with a kappa coefficient of 0.892 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.788-0.995). CORADS showed substantial agreement among reviewers with similar experience levels, with a kappa coefficient of 0.642 (95% CI, 0.491-0.793). There was inter-observer variation when comparing less experienced reviewers with more experienced reviewers, with the highest kappa coefficient of 0.396 (95% CI, 0.255-0.588). There was a significant correlation between both classifications, with a Kendall coefficient of 0.899 (p<0.001) and substantial intra-observer agreement for both classifications. CONCLUSION: The RSNA and CORADS classifications showed excellent inter-observer agreement for reviewers with the same level of experience, although the agreement between less experience reviewers and the reviewer with the most experience was only reasonable. Combined analysis of both classifications with the first RT-PCR results did not reveal any false-negative results for detecting COVID-19 in patients. Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2021-03-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7979034/ /pubmed/33787655 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e2476 Text en Copyright © 2021 CLINICS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fonseca, Eduardo Kaiser Ururahy Nunes Loureiro, Bruna Melo Coelho Strabelli, Daniel Giunchetti de Farias, Lucas de Pádua Gomes Garcia, José Vitor Rassi Gama, Victor Arcanjo Almeida Ferreira, Lorena Carneiro Chate, Rodrigo Caruso Assunção, Antonildes Nascimento Sawamura, Marcio Valente Yamada Nomura, Cesar Higa Evaluation of the RSNA and CORADS classifications for COVID-19 on chest computed tomography in the Brazilian population |
title | Evaluation of the RSNA and CORADS classifications for COVID-19 on chest computed tomography in the Brazilian population |
title_full | Evaluation of the RSNA and CORADS classifications for COVID-19 on chest computed tomography in the Brazilian population |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the RSNA and CORADS classifications for COVID-19 on chest computed tomography in the Brazilian population |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the RSNA and CORADS classifications for COVID-19 on chest computed tomography in the Brazilian population |
title_short | Evaluation of the RSNA and CORADS classifications for COVID-19 on chest computed tomography in the Brazilian population |
title_sort | evaluation of the rsna and corads classifications for covid-19 on chest computed tomography in the brazilian population |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33787655 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e2476 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fonsecaeduardokaiserururahynunes evaluationofthersnaandcoradsclassificationsforcovid19onchestcomputedtomographyinthebrazilianpopulation AT loureirobrunamelocoelho evaluationofthersnaandcoradsclassificationsforcovid19onchestcomputedtomographyinthebrazilianpopulation AT strabellidanielgiunchetti evaluationofthersnaandcoradsclassificationsforcovid19onchestcomputedtomographyinthebrazilianpopulation AT defariaslucasdepaduagomes evaluationofthersnaandcoradsclassificationsforcovid19onchestcomputedtomographyinthebrazilianpopulation AT garciajosevitorrassi evaluationofthersnaandcoradsclassificationsforcovid19onchestcomputedtomographyinthebrazilianpopulation AT gamavictorarcanjoalmeida evaluationofthersnaandcoradsclassificationsforcovid19onchestcomputedtomographyinthebrazilianpopulation AT ferreiralorenacarneiro evaluationofthersnaandcoradsclassificationsforcovid19onchestcomputedtomographyinthebrazilianpopulation AT chaterodrigocaruso evaluationofthersnaandcoradsclassificationsforcovid19onchestcomputedtomographyinthebrazilianpopulation AT assuncaoantonildesnascimento evaluationofthersnaandcoradsclassificationsforcovid19onchestcomputedtomographyinthebrazilianpopulation AT sawamuramarciovalenteyamada evaluationofthersnaandcoradsclassificationsforcovid19onchestcomputedtomographyinthebrazilianpopulation AT nomuracesarhiga evaluationofthersnaandcoradsclassificationsforcovid19onchestcomputedtomographyinthebrazilianpopulation |