Cargando…

Akzeptanz von Versorgungsangeboten zur ausschließlichen Fernbehandlung am Beispiel des telemedizinischen Modellprojekts „docdirekt“: ein Mixed-Methods Design

Objective Current telemedical services, such as the “docdirekt” project in Baden-Württemberg (BW), are evaluated for optimizing their implementation. Based on the results of this evaluation, strategies for adapting these services for exclusive remote treatment are identified that enable their integr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von Solodkoff, Michail, Strumann, Christoph, Steinhäuser, Jost
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32615623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1173-9903
_version_ 1783667257285541888
author von Solodkoff, Michail
Strumann, Christoph
Steinhäuser, Jost
author_facet von Solodkoff, Michail
Strumann, Christoph
Steinhäuser, Jost
author_sort von Solodkoff, Michail
collection PubMed
description Objective Current telemedical services, such as the “docdirekt” project in Baden-Württemberg (BW), are evaluated for optimizing their implementation. Based on the results of this evaluation, strategies for adapting these services for exclusive remote treatment are identified that enable their integration in regular medical care. Methods In the first part of the study, citizens from BW were individually interviewed on their expectations regarding such a project, and the advantages and barriers in the use of services for exclusive remote treatment. Determinants were explored by means of Mayring’s qualitative content analysis. In the second part of the study, these determinants were prioritized by using a quantitative survey of randomly selected citizens from BW. Results A total of 27 subjects (mean age 51 years, min: 23 years, max: 86 years) participated in the interviews. Most importantly, they found the direct accessibility of healthcare professionals a great advantage. A “24/7” hotline was found to be beneficial, as well as the possibility to get electronic prescriptions or medical sickness certificates. Privacy and a missing physical examination were perceived as barriers. In the questionnaire, the participants (n=217, return 10.9%, mean age: 53 years, min: 19 years, max: 88 years) rated a “direct medical contact” as the most important, followed by the “possibility to get a specialist” and to receive “a first therapy suggestion”. In total, n=71 (34.6%) rejected the future use of such a service. The willingness to use the service decreased with increasing age and decreasing digital skills. Conclusion The study shows that there is an interest in the use of services for exclusive remote treatment. People who intend to use telemedical service prioritize the fast-initial medical assessment and the comfort aspects and, among other things, consider the inclusion of additional services as beneficial. The next step is to incorporate these determinants into the existing telemedical service.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7979317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79793172021-03-22 Akzeptanz von Versorgungsangeboten zur ausschließlichen Fernbehandlung am Beispiel des telemedizinischen Modellprojekts „docdirekt“: ein Mixed-Methods Design von Solodkoff, Michail Strumann, Christoph Steinhäuser, Jost Gesundheitswesen Objective Current telemedical services, such as the “docdirekt” project in Baden-Württemberg (BW), are evaluated for optimizing their implementation. Based on the results of this evaluation, strategies for adapting these services for exclusive remote treatment are identified that enable their integration in regular medical care. Methods In the first part of the study, citizens from BW were individually interviewed on their expectations regarding such a project, and the advantages and barriers in the use of services for exclusive remote treatment. Determinants were explored by means of Mayring’s qualitative content analysis. In the second part of the study, these determinants were prioritized by using a quantitative survey of randomly selected citizens from BW. Results A total of 27 subjects (mean age 51 years, min: 23 years, max: 86 years) participated in the interviews. Most importantly, they found the direct accessibility of healthcare professionals a great advantage. A “24/7” hotline was found to be beneficial, as well as the possibility to get electronic prescriptions or medical sickness certificates. Privacy and a missing physical examination were perceived as barriers. In the questionnaire, the participants (n=217, return 10.9%, mean age: 53 years, min: 19 years, max: 88 years) rated a “direct medical contact” as the most important, followed by the “possibility to get a specialist” and to receive “a first therapy suggestion”. In total, n=71 (34.6%) rejected the future use of such a service. The willingness to use the service decreased with increasing age and decreasing digital skills. Conclusion The study shows that there is an interest in the use of services for exclusive remote treatment. People who intend to use telemedical service prioritize the fast-initial medical assessment and the comfort aspects and, among other things, consider the inclusion of additional services as beneficial. The next step is to incorporate these determinants into the existing telemedical service. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-03 2020-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7979317/ /pubmed/32615623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1173-9903 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle von Solodkoff, Michail
Strumann, Christoph
Steinhäuser, Jost
Akzeptanz von Versorgungsangeboten zur ausschließlichen Fernbehandlung am Beispiel des telemedizinischen Modellprojekts „docdirekt“: ein Mixed-Methods Design
title Akzeptanz von Versorgungsangeboten zur ausschließlichen Fernbehandlung am Beispiel des telemedizinischen Modellprojekts „docdirekt“: ein Mixed-Methods Design
title_full Akzeptanz von Versorgungsangeboten zur ausschließlichen Fernbehandlung am Beispiel des telemedizinischen Modellprojekts „docdirekt“: ein Mixed-Methods Design
title_fullStr Akzeptanz von Versorgungsangeboten zur ausschließlichen Fernbehandlung am Beispiel des telemedizinischen Modellprojekts „docdirekt“: ein Mixed-Methods Design
title_full_unstemmed Akzeptanz von Versorgungsangeboten zur ausschließlichen Fernbehandlung am Beispiel des telemedizinischen Modellprojekts „docdirekt“: ein Mixed-Methods Design
title_short Akzeptanz von Versorgungsangeboten zur ausschließlichen Fernbehandlung am Beispiel des telemedizinischen Modellprojekts „docdirekt“: ein Mixed-Methods Design
title_sort akzeptanz von versorgungsangeboten zur ausschließlichen fernbehandlung am beispiel des telemedizinischen modellprojekts „docdirekt“: ein mixed-methods design
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32615623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1173-9903
work_keys_str_mv AT vonsolodkoffmichail akzeptanzvonversorgungsangebotenzurausschließlichenfernbehandlungambeispieldestelemedizinischenmodellprojektsdocdirekteinmixedmethodsdesign
AT strumannchristoph akzeptanzvonversorgungsangebotenzurausschließlichenfernbehandlungambeispieldestelemedizinischenmodellprojektsdocdirekteinmixedmethodsdesign
AT steinhauserjost akzeptanzvonversorgungsangebotenzurausschließlichenfernbehandlungambeispieldestelemedizinischenmodellprojektsdocdirekteinmixedmethodsdesign