Cargando…

PROMPT intervention for children with severe speech motor delay: a randomized control trial

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is limited information on the intervention efficacy for children with speech motor delay (SMD). This randomized control trial (RCT) study examined the effectiveness of Prompts for Restructuring Oral Muscular Phonetic Targets (PROMPT) intervention to improve the outcomes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Namasivayam, Aravind K., Huynh, Anna, Granata, Francesca, Law, Vina, van Lieshout, Pascal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32357364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-0924-4
_version_ 1783667287358701568
author Namasivayam, Aravind K.
Huynh, Anna
Granata, Francesca
Law, Vina
van Lieshout, Pascal
author_facet Namasivayam, Aravind K.
Huynh, Anna
Granata, Francesca
Law, Vina
van Lieshout, Pascal
author_sort Namasivayam, Aravind K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, there is limited information on the intervention efficacy for children with speech motor delay (SMD). This randomized control trial (RCT) study examined the effectiveness of Prompts for Restructuring Oral Muscular Phonetic Targets (PROMPT) intervention to improve the outcomes in children with SMD. We hypothesized that children with SMD receiving PROMPT intervention would improve more in the measured outcomes than those waitlisted and receiving home training. METHODS: Using a two-arm, parallel group, RCT, 49 children with SMD were allocated to either an intervention group (N = 24) that received 45 min of PROMPT intervention two times a week for 10 weeks or were waitlisted for the same duration and received only home training instructions (N = 25). Outcome measures for speech motor control, articulation, speech intelligibility (word and sentence levels), and functional communication were assessed at baseline and at a 10-week follow-up. RESULTS: PROMPT intervention was associated with notable improvements in speech motor control, speech articulation, and word-level speech intelligibility. Intervention allocation yielded weak improvements in sentence-level speech intelligibility and functional communication. CONCLUSIONS: PROMPT intervention is a clinically effective intervention approach for children with SMD. IMPACT: Currently, there is limited information on the intervention efficacy for children with SMD. We report on the findings of a phase III intervention efficacy study on children with SMD using an RCT design. PROMPT intervention is a clinically effective intervention approach for children with SMD. Results of the study will be fundamental to the delivery of effective services for this population. These findings may facilitate the development of an evidence-based care pathway for children with severe speech sound disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7979536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79795362021-04-12 PROMPT intervention for children with severe speech motor delay: a randomized control trial Namasivayam, Aravind K. Huynh, Anna Granata, Francesca Law, Vina van Lieshout, Pascal Pediatr Res Clinical Research Article BACKGROUND: Currently, there is limited information on the intervention efficacy for children with speech motor delay (SMD). This randomized control trial (RCT) study examined the effectiveness of Prompts for Restructuring Oral Muscular Phonetic Targets (PROMPT) intervention to improve the outcomes in children with SMD. We hypothesized that children with SMD receiving PROMPT intervention would improve more in the measured outcomes than those waitlisted and receiving home training. METHODS: Using a two-arm, parallel group, RCT, 49 children with SMD were allocated to either an intervention group (N = 24) that received 45 min of PROMPT intervention two times a week for 10 weeks or were waitlisted for the same duration and received only home training instructions (N = 25). Outcome measures for speech motor control, articulation, speech intelligibility (word and sentence levels), and functional communication were assessed at baseline and at a 10-week follow-up. RESULTS: PROMPT intervention was associated with notable improvements in speech motor control, speech articulation, and word-level speech intelligibility. Intervention allocation yielded weak improvements in sentence-level speech intelligibility and functional communication. CONCLUSIONS: PROMPT intervention is a clinically effective intervention approach for children with SMD. IMPACT: Currently, there is limited information on the intervention efficacy for children with SMD. We report on the findings of a phase III intervention efficacy study on children with SMD using an RCT design. PROMPT intervention is a clinically effective intervention approach for children with SMD. Results of the study will be fundamental to the delivery of effective services for this population. These findings may facilitate the development of an evidence-based care pathway for children with severe speech sound disorders. Nature Publishing Group US 2020-05-01 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7979536/ /pubmed/32357364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-0924-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Article
Namasivayam, Aravind K.
Huynh, Anna
Granata, Francesca
Law, Vina
van Lieshout, Pascal
PROMPT intervention for children with severe speech motor delay: a randomized control trial
title PROMPT intervention for children with severe speech motor delay: a randomized control trial
title_full PROMPT intervention for children with severe speech motor delay: a randomized control trial
title_fullStr PROMPT intervention for children with severe speech motor delay: a randomized control trial
title_full_unstemmed PROMPT intervention for children with severe speech motor delay: a randomized control trial
title_short PROMPT intervention for children with severe speech motor delay: a randomized control trial
title_sort prompt intervention for children with severe speech motor delay: a randomized control trial
topic Clinical Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32357364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-0924-4
work_keys_str_mv AT namasivayamaravindk promptinterventionforchildrenwithseverespeechmotordelayarandomizedcontroltrial
AT huynhanna promptinterventionforchildrenwithseverespeechmotordelayarandomizedcontroltrial
AT granatafrancesca promptinterventionforchildrenwithseverespeechmotordelayarandomizedcontroltrial
AT lawvina promptinterventionforchildrenwithseverespeechmotordelayarandomizedcontroltrial
AT vanlieshoutpascal promptinterventionforchildrenwithseverespeechmotordelayarandomizedcontroltrial