Cargando…
Practical applications of deep learning: classifying the most common categories of plain radiographs in a PACS using a neural network
OBJECTIVES: The goal of the present study was to classify the most common types of plain radiographs using a neural network and to validate the network’s performance on internal and external data. Such a network could help improve various radiological workflows. METHODS: All radiographs from the yea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979627/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32986160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07241-6 |
_version_ | 1783667300559224832 |
---|---|
author | Dratsch, Thomas Korenkov, Michael Zopfs, David Brodehl, Sebastian Baessler, Bettina Giese, Daniel Brinkmann, Sebastian Maintz, David Pinto dos Santos, Daniel |
author_facet | Dratsch, Thomas Korenkov, Michael Zopfs, David Brodehl, Sebastian Baessler, Bettina Giese, Daniel Brinkmann, Sebastian Maintz, David Pinto dos Santos, Daniel |
author_sort | Dratsch, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The goal of the present study was to classify the most common types of plain radiographs using a neural network and to validate the network’s performance on internal and external data. Such a network could help improve various radiological workflows. METHODS: All radiographs from the year 2017 (n = 71,274) acquired at our institution were retrieved from the PACS. The 30 largest categories (n = 58,219, 81.7% of all radiographs performed in 2017) were used to develop and validate a neural network (MobileNet v1.0) using transfer learning. Image categories were extracted from DICOM metadata (study and image description) and mapped to the WHO manual of diagnostic imaging. As an independent, external validation set, we used images from other institutions that had been stored in our PACS (n = 5324). RESULTS: In the internal validation, the overall accuracy of the model was 90.3% (95%CI: 89.2–91.3%), whereas, for the external validation set, the overall accuracy was 94.0% (95%CI: 93.3–94.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Using data from one single institution, we were able to classify the most common categories of radiographs with a neural network. The network showed good generalizability on the external validation set and could be used to automatically organize a PACS, preselect radiographs so that they can be routed to more specialized networks for abnormality detection or help with other parts of the radiological workflow (e.g., automated hanging protocols; check if ordered image and performed image are the same). The final AI algorithm is publicly available for evaluation and extension. KEY POINTS: • Data from one single institution can be used to train a neural network for the correct detection of the 30 most common categories of plain radiographs. • The trained model achieved a high accuracy for the majority of categories and showed good generalizability to images from other institutions. • The neural network is made publicly available and can be used to automatically organize a PACS or to preselect radiographs so that they can be routed to more specialized neural networks for abnormality detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7979627 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79796272021-04-05 Practical applications of deep learning: classifying the most common categories of plain radiographs in a PACS using a neural network Dratsch, Thomas Korenkov, Michael Zopfs, David Brodehl, Sebastian Baessler, Bettina Giese, Daniel Brinkmann, Sebastian Maintz, David Pinto dos Santos, Daniel Eur Radiol Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence OBJECTIVES: The goal of the present study was to classify the most common types of plain radiographs using a neural network and to validate the network’s performance on internal and external data. Such a network could help improve various radiological workflows. METHODS: All radiographs from the year 2017 (n = 71,274) acquired at our institution were retrieved from the PACS. The 30 largest categories (n = 58,219, 81.7% of all radiographs performed in 2017) were used to develop and validate a neural network (MobileNet v1.0) using transfer learning. Image categories were extracted from DICOM metadata (study and image description) and mapped to the WHO manual of diagnostic imaging. As an independent, external validation set, we used images from other institutions that had been stored in our PACS (n = 5324). RESULTS: In the internal validation, the overall accuracy of the model was 90.3% (95%CI: 89.2–91.3%), whereas, for the external validation set, the overall accuracy was 94.0% (95%CI: 93.3–94.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Using data from one single institution, we were able to classify the most common categories of radiographs with a neural network. The network showed good generalizability on the external validation set and could be used to automatically organize a PACS, preselect radiographs so that they can be routed to more specialized networks for abnormality detection or help with other parts of the radiological workflow (e.g., automated hanging protocols; check if ordered image and performed image are the same). The final AI algorithm is publicly available for evaluation and extension. KEY POINTS: • Data from one single institution can be used to train a neural network for the correct detection of the 30 most common categories of plain radiographs. • The trained model achieved a high accuracy for the majority of categories and showed good generalizability to images from other institutions. • The neural network is made publicly available and can be used to automatically organize a PACS or to preselect radiographs so that they can be routed to more specialized neural networks for abnormality detection. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-28 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7979627/ /pubmed/32986160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07241-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence Dratsch, Thomas Korenkov, Michael Zopfs, David Brodehl, Sebastian Baessler, Bettina Giese, Daniel Brinkmann, Sebastian Maintz, David Pinto dos Santos, Daniel Practical applications of deep learning: classifying the most common categories of plain radiographs in a PACS using a neural network |
title | Practical applications of deep learning: classifying the most common categories of plain radiographs in a PACS using a neural network |
title_full | Practical applications of deep learning: classifying the most common categories of plain radiographs in a PACS using a neural network |
title_fullStr | Practical applications of deep learning: classifying the most common categories of plain radiographs in a PACS using a neural network |
title_full_unstemmed | Practical applications of deep learning: classifying the most common categories of plain radiographs in a PACS using a neural network |
title_short | Practical applications of deep learning: classifying the most common categories of plain radiographs in a PACS using a neural network |
title_sort | practical applications of deep learning: classifying the most common categories of plain radiographs in a pacs using a neural network |
topic | Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979627/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32986160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07241-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dratschthomas practicalapplicationsofdeeplearningclassifyingthemostcommoncategoriesofplainradiographsinapacsusinganeuralnetwork AT korenkovmichael practicalapplicationsofdeeplearningclassifyingthemostcommoncategoriesofplainradiographsinapacsusinganeuralnetwork AT zopfsdavid practicalapplicationsofdeeplearningclassifyingthemostcommoncategoriesofplainradiographsinapacsusinganeuralnetwork AT brodehlsebastian practicalapplicationsofdeeplearningclassifyingthemostcommoncategoriesofplainradiographsinapacsusinganeuralnetwork AT baesslerbettina practicalapplicationsofdeeplearningclassifyingthemostcommoncategoriesofplainradiographsinapacsusinganeuralnetwork AT giesedaniel practicalapplicationsofdeeplearningclassifyingthemostcommoncategoriesofplainradiographsinapacsusinganeuralnetwork AT brinkmannsebastian practicalapplicationsofdeeplearningclassifyingthemostcommoncategoriesofplainradiographsinapacsusinganeuralnetwork AT maintzdavid practicalapplicationsofdeeplearningclassifyingthemostcommoncategoriesofplainradiographsinapacsusinganeuralnetwork AT pintodossantosdaniel practicalapplicationsofdeeplearningclassifyingthemostcommoncategoriesofplainradiographsinapacsusinganeuralnetwork |