Cargando…

The influence of inlet velocity profile on predicted flow in type B aortic dissection

In order for computational fluid dynamics to provide quantitative parameters to aid in the clinical assessment of type B aortic dissection, the results must accurately mimic the hemodynamic environment within the aorta. The choice of inlet velocity profile (IVP) therefore is crucial; however, ideali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Armour, Chlöe Harriet, Guo, Baolei, Pirola, Selene, Saitta, Simone, Liu, Yifan, Dong, Zhihui, Xu, Xiao Yun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33068193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-020-01395-4
_version_ 1783667301253382144
author Armour, Chlöe Harriet
Guo, Baolei
Pirola, Selene
Saitta, Simone
Liu, Yifan
Dong, Zhihui
Xu, Xiao Yun
author_facet Armour, Chlöe Harriet
Guo, Baolei
Pirola, Selene
Saitta, Simone
Liu, Yifan
Dong, Zhihui
Xu, Xiao Yun
author_sort Armour, Chlöe Harriet
collection PubMed
description In order for computational fluid dynamics to provide quantitative parameters to aid in the clinical assessment of type B aortic dissection, the results must accurately mimic the hemodynamic environment within the aorta. The choice of inlet velocity profile (IVP) therefore is crucial; however, idealised profiles are often adopted, and the effect of IVP on hemodynamics in a dissected aorta is unclear. This study examined two scenarios with respect to the influence of IVP—using (a) patient-specific data in the form of a three-directional (3D), through-plane (TP) or flat IVP; and (b) non-patient-specific flow waveform. The results obtained from nine simulations using patient-specific data showed that all forms of IVP were able to reproduce global flow patterns as observed with 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging. Differences in maximum velocity and time-averaged wall shear stress near the primary entry tear were up to 3% and 6%, respectively, while pressure differences across the true and false lumen differed by up to 6%. More notable variations were found in regions of low wall shear stress when the primary entry tear was close to the left subclavian artery. The results obtained with non-patient-specific waveforms were markedly different. Throughout the aorta, a 25% reduction in stroke volume resulted in up to 28% and 35% reduction in velocity and wall shear stress, respectively, while the shape of flow waveform had a profound influence on the predicted pressure. The results of this study suggest that 3D, TP and flat IVPs all yield reasonably similar velocity and time-averaged wall shear stress results, but TP IVPs should be used where possible for better prediction of pressure. In the absence of patient-specific velocity data, effort should be made to acquire patient’s stroke volume and adjust the applied IVP accordingly. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10237-020-01395-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7979630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79796302021-04-05 The influence of inlet velocity profile on predicted flow in type B aortic dissection Armour, Chlöe Harriet Guo, Baolei Pirola, Selene Saitta, Simone Liu, Yifan Dong, Zhihui Xu, Xiao Yun Biomech Model Mechanobiol Original Paper In order for computational fluid dynamics to provide quantitative parameters to aid in the clinical assessment of type B aortic dissection, the results must accurately mimic the hemodynamic environment within the aorta. The choice of inlet velocity profile (IVP) therefore is crucial; however, idealised profiles are often adopted, and the effect of IVP on hemodynamics in a dissected aorta is unclear. This study examined two scenarios with respect to the influence of IVP—using (a) patient-specific data in the form of a three-directional (3D), through-plane (TP) or flat IVP; and (b) non-patient-specific flow waveform. The results obtained from nine simulations using patient-specific data showed that all forms of IVP were able to reproduce global flow patterns as observed with 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging. Differences in maximum velocity and time-averaged wall shear stress near the primary entry tear were up to 3% and 6%, respectively, while pressure differences across the true and false lumen differed by up to 6%. More notable variations were found in regions of low wall shear stress when the primary entry tear was close to the left subclavian artery. The results obtained with non-patient-specific waveforms were markedly different. Throughout the aorta, a 25% reduction in stroke volume resulted in up to 28% and 35% reduction in velocity and wall shear stress, respectively, while the shape of flow waveform had a profound influence on the predicted pressure. The results of this study suggest that 3D, TP and flat IVPs all yield reasonably similar velocity and time-averaged wall shear stress results, but TP IVPs should be used where possible for better prediction of pressure. In the absence of patient-specific velocity data, effort should be made to acquire patient’s stroke volume and adjust the applied IVP accordingly. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10237-020-01395-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-17 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7979630/ /pubmed/33068193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-020-01395-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Armour, Chlöe Harriet
Guo, Baolei
Pirola, Selene
Saitta, Simone
Liu, Yifan
Dong, Zhihui
Xu, Xiao Yun
The influence of inlet velocity profile on predicted flow in type B aortic dissection
title The influence of inlet velocity profile on predicted flow in type B aortic dissection
title_full The influence of inlet velocity profile on predicted flow in type B aortic dissection
title_fullStr The influence of inlet velocity profile on predicted flow in type B aortic dissection
title_full_unstemmed The influence of inlet velocity profile on predicted flow in type B aortic dissection
title_short The influence of inlet velocity profile on predicted flow in type B aortic dissection
title_sort influence of inlet velocity profile on predicted flow in type b aortic dissection
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33068193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-020-01395-4
work_keys_str_mv AT armourchloeharriet theinfluenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection
AT guobaolei theinfluenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection
AT pirolaselene theinfluenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection
AT saittasimone theinfluenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection
AT liuyifan theinfluenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection
AT dongzhihui theinfluenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection
AT xuxiaoyun theinfluenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection
AT armourchloeharriet influenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection
AT guobaolei influenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection
AT pirolaselene influenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection
AT saittasimone influenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection
AT liuyifan influenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection
AT dongzhihui influenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection
AT xuxiaoyun influenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection