Cargando…
The influence of inlet velocity profile on predicted flow in type B aortic dissection
In order for computational fluid dynamics to provide quantitative parameters to aid in the clinical assessment of type B aortic dissection, the results must accurately mimic the hemodynamic environment within the aorta. The choice of inlet velocity profile (IVP) therefore is crucial; however, ideali...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33068193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-020-01395-4 |
_version_ | 1783667301253382144 |
---|---|
author | Armour, Chlöe Harriet Guo, Baolei Pirola, Selene Saitta, Simone Liu, Yifan Dong, Zhihui Xu, Xiao Yun |
author_facet | Armour, Chlöe Harriet Guo, Baolei Pirola, Selene Saitta, Simone Liu, Yifan Dong, Zhihui Xu, Xiao Yun |
author_sort | Armour, Chlöe Harriet |
collection | PubMed |
description | In order for computational fluid dynamics to provide quantitative parameters to aid in the clinical assessment of type B aortic dissection, the results must accurately mimic the hemodynamic environment within the aorta. The choice of inlet velocity profile (IVP) therefore is crucial; however, idealised profiles are often adopted, and the effect of IVP on hemodynamics in a dissected aorta is unclear. This study examined two scenarios with respect to the influence of IVP—using (a) patient-specific data in the form of a three-directional (3D), through-plane (TP) or flat IVP; and (b) non-patient-specific flow waveform. The results obtained from nine simulations using patient-specific data showed that all forms of IVP were able to reproduce global flow patterns as observed with 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging. Differences in maximum velocity and time-averaged wall shear stress near the primary entry tear were up to 3% and 6%, respectively, while pressure differences across the true and false lumen differed by up to 6%. More notable variations were found in regions of low wall shear stress when the primary entry tear was close to the left subclavian artery. The results obtained with non-patient-specific waveforms were markedly different. Throughout the aorta, a 25% reduction in stroke volume resulted in up to 28% and 35% reduction in velocity and wall shear stress, respectively, while the shape of flow waveform had a profound influence on the predicted pressure. The results of this study suggest that 3D, TP and flat IVPs all yield reasonably similar velocity and time-averaged wall shear stress results, but TP IVPs should be used where possible for better prediction of pressure. In the absence of patient-specific velocity data, effort should be made to acquire patient’s stroke volume and adjust the applied IVP accordingly. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10237-020-01395-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7979630 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79796302021-04-05 The influence of inlet velocity profile on predicted flow in type B aortic dissection Armour, Chlöe Harriet Guo, Baolei Pirola, Selene Saitta, Simone Liu, Yifan Dong, Zhihui Xu, Xiao Yun Biomech Model Mechanobiol Original Paper In order for computational fluid dynamics to provide quantitative parameters to aid in the clinical assessment of type B aortic dissection, the results must accurately mimic the hemodynamic environment within the aorta. The choice of inlet velocity profile (IVP) therefore is crucial; however, idealised profiles are often adopted, and the effect of IVP on hemodynamics in a dissected aorta is unclear. This study examined two scenarios with respect to the influence of IVP—using (a) patient-specific data in the form of a three-directional (3D), through-plane (TP) or flat IVP; and (b) non-patient-specific flow waveform. The results obtained from nine simulations using patient-specific data showed that all forms of IVP were able to reproduce global flow patterns as observed with 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging. Differences in maximum velocity and time-averaged wall shear stress near the primary entry tear were up to 3% and 6%, respectively, while pressure differences across the true and false lumen differed by up to 6%. More notable variations were found in regions of low wall shear stress when the primary entry tear was close to the left subclavian artery. The results obtained with non-patient-specific waveforms were markedly different. Throughout the aorta, a 25% reduction in stroke volume resulted in up to 28% and 35% reduction in velocity and wall shear stress, respectively, while the shape of flow waveform had a profound influence on the predicted pressure. The results of this study suggest that 3D, TP and flat IVPs all yield reasonably similar velocity and time-averaged wall shear stress results, but TP IVPs should be used where possible for better prediction of pressure. In the absence of patient-specific velocity data, effort should be made to acquire patient’s stroke volume and adjust the applied IVP accordingly. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10237-020-01395-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-17 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7979630/ /pubmed/33068193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-020-01395-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Armour, Chlöe Harriet Guo, Baolei Pirola, Selene Saitta, Simone Liu, Yifan Dong, Zhihui Xu, Xiao Yun The influence of inlet velocity profile on predicted flow in type B aortic dissection |
title | The influence of inlet velocity profile on predicted flow in type B aortic dissection |
title_full | The influence of inlet velocity profile on predicted flow in type B aortic dissection |
title_fullStr | The influence of inlet velocity profile on predicted flow in type B aortic dissection |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of inlet velocity profile on predicted flow in type B aortic dissection |
title_short | The influence of inlet velocity profile on predicted flow in type B aortic dissection |
title_sort | influence of inlet velocity profile on predicted flow in type b aortic dissection |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33068193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-020-01395-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT armourchloeharriet theinfluenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection AT guobaolei theinfluenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection AT pirolaselene theinfluenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection AT saittasimone theinfluenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection AT liuyifan theinfluenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection AT dongzhihui theinfluenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection AT xuxiaoyun theinfluenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection AT armourchloeharriet influenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection AT guobaolei influenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection AT pirolaselene influenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection AT saittasimone influenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection AT liuyifan influenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection AT dongzhihui influenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection AT xuxiaoyun influenceofinletvelocityprofileonpredictedflowintypebaorticdissection |