Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of spleen stiffness to evaluate portal hypertension and esophageal varices in chronic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review studies on the diagnostic accuracy of spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) for the detection of clinical significant portal hypertension (CSPH), severe portal hypertension (SPH), esophageal varices (EV), and high-risk esophageal varices (HREV) in patients with chro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Xing, Huang, Xiaojie, Hou, Jianhua, Ding, Lei, Su, Chunling, Meng, Fankun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07223-8
_version_ 1783667305692004352
author Hu, Xing
Huang, Xiaojie
Hou, Jianhua
Ding, Lei
Su, Chunling
Meng, Fankun
author_facet Hu, Xing
Huang, Xiaojie
Hou, Jianhua
Ding, Lei
Su, Chunling
Meng, Fankun
author_sort Hu, Xing
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To systematically review studies on the diagnostic accuracy of spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) for the detection of clinical significant portal hypertension (CSPH), severe portal hypertension (SPH), esophageal varices (EV), and high-risk esophageal varices (HREV) in patients with chronic liver diseases (CLD). METHODS: Through a systematic search, we identified 32 studies reporting the accuracy of SSM for the diagnosis of portal hypertension (PH) and/or EV in adults with CLD. A bivariate random-effects model was performed to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR). The clinical utility of SSM was evaluated by Fagan plot. RESULTS: A total of 32 studies assessing 3952 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivities of SSM were 0.85 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69–0.93) for CSPH; 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75–0.90) for SPH; 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83–0.94) for any EV; and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.77–0.93) for HREV. The pooled specificities of SSM were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74–0.93) for CSPH; 0.84 (95% CI, 0.72–0.91) for SPH; 0.73 (95% CI, 0.66–0.79) for EV; and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.53–0.77) for HREV. Summary PPV and NPV of SSM for detecting HREV were 0.54 (95% CI, 0.47–0.62) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.81–0.95), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that SSM could be used as a helpful surveillance tool in management of CLD patients and was quite useful for ruling out the presence of HREV thereby avoiding unnecessary endoscopy. KEY POINTS: • SSM could be used to rule out the presence of HREV in patients with CLD thereby avoiding unnecessary endoscopy. • SSM has significant diagnostic value for CSPH and SPH with high sensitivity and specificity in patients with CLD. • SSM could be used as a helpful surveillance tool for clinicians managing CLD patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07223-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7979650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79796502021-04-05 Diagnostic accuracy of spleen stiffness to evaluate portal hypertension and esophageal varices in chronic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hu, Xing Huang, Xiaojie Hou, Jianhua Ding, Lei Su, Chunling Meng, Fankun Eur Radiol Ultrasound OBJECTIVES: To systematically review studies on the diagnostic accuracy of spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) for the detection of clinical significant portal hypertension (CSPH), severe portal hypertension (SPH), esophageal varices (EV), and high-risk esophageal varices (HREV) in patients with chronic liver diseases (CLD). METHODS: Through a systematic search, we identified 32 studies reporting the accuracy of SSM for the diagnosis of portal hypertension (PH) and/or EV in adults with CLD. A bivariate random-effects model was performed to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR). The clinical utility of SSM was evaluated by Fagan plot. RESULTS: A total of 32 studies assessing 3952 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivities of SSM were 0.85 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69–0.93) for CSPH; 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75–0.90) for SPH; 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83–0.94) for any EV; and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.77–0.93) for HREV. The pooled specificities of SSM were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74–0.93) for CSPH; 0.84 (95% CI, 0.72–0.91) for SPH; 0.73 (95% CI, 0.66–0.79) for EV; and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.53–0.77) for HREV. Summary PPV and NPV of SSM for detecting HREV were 0.54 (95% CI, 0.47–0.62) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.81–0.95), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that SSM could be used as a helpful surveillance tool in management of CLD patients and was quite useful for ruling out the presence of HREV thereby avoiding unnecessary endoscopy. KEY POINTS: • SSM could be used to rule out the presence of HREV in patients with CLD thereby avoiding unnecessary endoscopy. • SSM has significant diagnostic value for CSPH and SPH with high sensitivity and specificity in patients with CLD. • SSM could be used as a helpful surveillance tool for clinicians managing CLD patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07223-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-24 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7979650/ /pubmed/32974686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07223-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Ultrasound
Hu, Xing
Huang, Xiaojie
Hou, Jianhua
Ding, Lei
Su, Chunling
Meng, Fankun
Diagnostic accuracy of spleen stiffness to evaluate portal hypertension and esophageal varices in chronic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Diagnostic accuracy of spleen stiffness to evaluate portal hypertension and esophageal varices in chronic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of spleen stiffness to evaluate portal hypertension and esophageal varices in chronic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of spleen stiffness to evaluate portal hypertension and esophageal varices in chronic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of spleen stiffness to evaluate portal hypertension and esophageal varices in chronic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of spleen stiffness to evaluate portal hypertension and esophageal varices in chronic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of spleen stiffness to evaluate portal hypertension and esophageal varices in chronic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Ultrasound
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07223-8
work_keys_str_mv AT huxing diagnosticaccuracyofspleenstiffnesstoevaluateportalhypertensionandesophagealvaricesinchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huangxiaojie diagnosticaccuracyofspleenstiffnesstoevaluateportalhypertensionandesophagealvaricesinchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT houjianhua diagnosticaccuracyofspleenstiffnesstoevaluateportalhypertensionandesophagealvaricesinchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dinglei diagnosticaccuracyofspleenstiffnesstoevaluateportalhypertensionandesophagealvaricesinchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT suchunling diagnosticaccuracyofspleenstiffnesstoevaluateportalhypertensionandesophagealvaricesinchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mengfankun diagnosticaccuracyofspleenstiffnesstoevaluateportalhypertensionandesophagealvaricesinchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis