Cargando…

An analysis of screen-detected invasive cancers by grade in the English breast cancer screening programme: are we failing to detect sufficient small grade 3 cancers?

OBJECTIVE: Randomised controlled trials have shown a reduction in breast cancer mortality from mammography screening and it is the detection of high-grade invasive cancers that is responsible for much of this effect. We determined the detection rates of invasive cancers by grade, size and type of sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blanks, R. G., Wallis, M. G., Alison, R. J., Given-Wilson, R. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32997179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07276-9
_version_ 1783667306866409472
author Blanks, R. G.
Wallis, M. G.
Alison, R. J.
Given-Wilson, R. M.
author_facet Blanks, R. G.
Wallis, M. G.
Alison, R. J.
Given-Wilson, R. M.
author_sort Blanks, R. G.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Randomised controlled trials have shown a reduction in breast cancer mortality from mammography screening and it is the detection of high-grade invasive cancers that is responsible for much of this effect. We determined the detection rates of invasive cancers by grade, size and type of screen and estimated relative sensitivities with emphasis on grade 3 detection. METHODS: This observational study analysed data from over 11 million screening episodes (67,681 invasive cancers) from the English NHS breast screening programme over seven screening years 2009/2010 to 2015/2016 for women aged 45–70. RESULTS: At prevalent (first) screens (which are unaffected by screening interval), the detection rate of small (< 15 mm) invasive cancers was 0.95 per 1000 for grade 1, but for grade 3 only 0.30 per 1000. The ratio of small (< 15 mm) to large (≥ 15 mm) cancers was 1.8:1 for grade 1 but reversed to 0.5:1 for grade 3. We estimated that the relative sensitivity for grade 3 invasive cancers was 52% of that for grade 1 and the relative sensitivity for small (< 15 mm) grade 3 only 26% of that for small (< 15 mm) grade 1 invasive cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivity for small grade 3 invasive cancers is poor compared with that for grade 1 and 2 invasive cancers and larger grade 3 malignancies. This observation is likely a limitation of the current technology related to the absence of identifiable mammographic features for small high-grade cancers. Future work should focus on technologies and strategies to improve detection of these clinically most significant cancers. KEY POINTS: • The detection of small high-grade invasive cancers is vital to reduce breast cancer mortality. • We estimate the sensitivity for small grade 3 invasive cancers may be only 26% of that of small grade 1 invasive cancers. This is likely to be associated with the non-specific mammographic features for these cancers. • New technologies and appropriate strategies using current technology are required to maximise the detection of small grade 3 invasive cancers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07276-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7979656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79796562021-04-05 An analysis of screen-detected invasive cancers by grade in the English breast cancer screening programme: are we failing to detect sufficient small grade 3 cancers? Blanks, R. G. Wallis, M. G. Alison, R. J. Given-Wilson, R. M. Eur Radiol Breast OBJECTIVE: Randomised controlled trials have shown a reduction in breast cancer mortality from mammography screening and it is the detection of high-grade invasive cancers that is responsible for much of this effect. We determined the detection rates of invasive cancers by grade, size and type of screen and estimated relative sensitivities with emphasis on grade 3 detection. METHODS: This observational study analysed data from over 11 million screening episodes (67,681 invasive cancers) from the English NHS breast screening programme over seven screening years 2009/2010 to 2015/2016 for women aged 45–70. RESULTS: At prevalent (first) screens (which are unaffected by screening interval), the detection rate of small (< 15 mm) invasive cancers was 0.95 per 1000 for grade 1, but for grade 3 only 0.30 per 1000. The ratio of small (< 15 mm) to large (≥ 15 mm) cancers was 1.8:1 for grade 1 but reversed to 0.5:1 for grade 3. We estimated that the relative sensitivity for grade 3 invasive cancers was 52% of that for grade 1 and the relative sensitivity for small (< 15 mm) grade 3 only 26% of that for small (< 15 mm) grade 1 invasive cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivity for small grade 3 invasive cancers is poor compared with that for grade 1 and 2 invasive cancers and larger grade 3 malignancies. This observation is likely a limitation of the current technology related to the absence of identifiable mammographic features for small high-grade cancers. Future work should focus on technologies and strategies to improve detection of these clinically most significant cancers. KEY POINTS: • The detection of small high-grade invasive cancers is vital to reduce breast cancer mortality. • We estimate the sensitivity for small grade 3 invasive cancers may be only 26% of that of small grade 1 invasive cancers. This is likely to be associated with the non-specific mammographic features for these cancers. • New technologies and appropriate strategies using current technology are required to maximise the detection of small grade 3 invasive cancers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07276-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-30 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7979656/ /pubmed/32997179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07276-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Breast
Blanks, R. G.
Wallis, M. G.
Alison, R. J.
Given-Wilson, R. M.
An analysis of screen-detected invasive cancers by grade in the English breast cancer screening programme: are we failing to detect sufficient small grade 3 cancers?
title An analysis of screen-detected invasive cancers by grade in the English breast cancer screening programme: are we failing to detect sufficient small grade 3 cancers?
title_full An analysis of screen-detected invasive cancers by grade in the English breast cancer screening programme: are we failing to detect sufficient small grade 3 cancers?
title_fullStr An analysis of screen-detected invasive cancers by grade in the English breast cancer screening programme: are we failing to detect sufficient small grade 3 cancers?
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of screen-detected invasive cancers by grade in the English breast cancer screening programme: are we failing to detect sufficient small grade 3 cancers?
title_short An analysis of screen-detected invasive cancers by grade in the English breast cancer screening programme: are we failing to detect sufficient small grade 3 cancers?
title_sort analysis of screen-detected invasive cancers by grade in the english breast cancer screening programme: are we failing to detect sufficient small grade 3 cancers?
topic Breast
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32997179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07276-9
work_keys_str_mv AT blanksrg ananalysisofscreendetectedinvasivecancersbygradeintheenglishbreastcancerscreeningprogrammearewefailingtodetectsufficientsmallgrade3cancers
AT wallismg ananalysisofscreendetectedinvasivecancersbygradeintheenglishbreastcancerscreeningprogrammearewefailingtodetectsufficientsmallgrade3cancers
AT alisonrj ananalysisofscreendetectedinvasivecancersbygradeintheenglishbreastcancerscreeningprogrammearewefailingtodetectsufficientsmallgrade3cancers
AT givenwilsonrm ananalysisofscreendetectedinvasivecancersbygradeintheenglishbreastcancerscreeningprogrammearewefailingtodetectsufficientsmallgrade3cancers
AT blanksrg analysisofscreendetectedinvasivecancersbygradeintheenglishbreastcancerscreeningprogrammearewefailingtodetectsufficientsmallgrade3cancers
AT wallismg analysisofscreendetectedinvasivecancersbygradeintheenglishbreastcancerscreeningprogrammearewefailingtodetectsufficientsmallgrade3cancers
AT alisonrj analysisofscreendetectedinvasivecancersbygradeintheenglishbreastcancerscreeningprogrammearewefailingtodetectsufficientsmallgrade3cancers
AT givenwilsonrm analysisofscreendetectedinvasivecancersbygradeintheenglishbreastcancerscreeningprogrammearewefailingtodetectsufficientsmallgrade3cancers