Cargando…

The potential of artificial intelligence to improve patient safety: a scoping review

Artificial intelligence (AI) represents a valuable tool that could be used to improve the safety of care. Major adverse events in healthcare include: healthcare-associated infections, adverse drug events, venous thromboembolism, surgical complications, pressure ulcers, falls, decompensation, and dia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bates, David W., Levine, David, Syrowatka, Ania, Kuznetsova, Masha, Craig, Kelly Jean Thomas, Rui, Angela, Jackson, Gretchen Purcell, Rhee, Kyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33742085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00423-6
_version_ 1783667327837929472
author Bates, David W.
Levine, David
Syrowatka, Ania
Kuznetsova, Masha
Craig, Kelly Jean Thomas
Rui, Angela
Jackson, Gretchen Purcell
Rhee, Kyu
author_facet Bates, David W.
Levine, David
Syrowatka, Ania
Kuznetsova, Masha
Craig, Kelly Jean Thomas
Rui, Angela
Jackson, Gretchen Purcell
Rhee, Kyu
author_sort Bates, David W.
collection PubMed
description Artificial intelligence (AI) represents a valuable tool that could be used to improve the safety of care. Major adverse events in healthcare include: healthcare-associated infections, adverse drug events, venous thromboembolism, surgical complications, pressure ulcers, falls, decompensation, and diagnostic errors. The objective of this scoping review was to summarize the relevant literature and evaluate the potential of AI to improve patient safety in these eight harm domains. A structured search was used to query MEDLINE for relevant articles. The scoping review identified studies that described the application of AI for prediction, prevention, or early detection of adverse events in each of the harm domains. The AI literature was narratively synthesized for each domain, and findings were considered in the context of incidence, cost, and preventability to make projections about the likelihood of AI improving safety. Three-hundred and ninety-two studies were included in the scoping review. The literature provided numerous examples of how AI has been applied within each of the eight harm domains using various techniques. The most common novel data were collected using different types of sensing technologies: vital sign monitoring, wearables, pressure sensors, and computer vision. There are significant opportunities to leverage AI and novel data sources to reduce the frequency of harm across all domains. We expect AI to have the greatest impact in areas where current strategies are not effective, and integration and complex analysis of novel, unstructured data are necessary to make accurate predictions; this applies specifically to adverse drug events, decompensation, and diagnostic errors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7979747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79797472021-04-12 The potential of artificial intelligence to improve patient safety: a scoping review Bates, David W. Levine, David Syrowatka, Ania Kuznetsova, Masha Craig, Kelly Jean Thomas Rui, Angela Jackson, Gretchen Purcell Rhee, Kyu NPJ Digit Med Review Article Artificial intelligence (AI) represents a valuable tool that could be used to improve the safety of care. Major adverse events in healthcare include: healthcare-associated infections, adverse drug events, venous thromboembolism, surgical complications, pressure ulcers, falls, decompensation, and diagnostic errors. The objective of this scoping review was to summarize the relevant literature and evaluate the potential of AI to improve patient safety in these eight harm domains. A structured search was used to query MEDLINE for relevant articles. The scoping review identified studies that described the application of AI for prediction, prevention, or early detection of adverse events in each of the harm domains. The AI literature was narratively synthesized for each domain, and findings were considered in the context of incidence, cost, and preventability to make projections about the likelihood of AI improving safety. Three-hundred and ninety-two studies were included in the scoping review. The literature provided numerous examples of how AI has been applied within each of the eight harm domains using various techniques. The most common novel data were collected using different types of sensing technologies: vital sign monitoring, wearables, pressure sensors, and computer vision. There are significant opportunities to leverage AI and novel data sources to reduce the frequency of harm across all domains. We expect AI to have the greatest impact in areas where current strategies are not effective, and integration and complex analysis of novel, unstructured data are necessary to make accurate predictions; this applies specifically to adverse drug events, decompensation, and diagnostic errors. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7979747/ /pubmed/33742085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00423-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review Article
Bates, David W.
Levine, David
Syrowatka, Ania
Kuznetsova, Masha
Craig, Kelly Jean Thomas
Rui, Angela
Jackson, Gretchen Purcell
Rhee, Kyu
The potential of artificial intelligence to improve patient safety: a scoping review
title The potential of artificial intelligence to improve patient safety: a scoping review
title_full The potential of artificial intelligence to improve patient safety: a scoping review
title_fullStr The potential of artificial intelligence to improve patient safety: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed The potential of artificial intelligence to improve patient safety: a scoping review
title_short The potential of artificial intelligence to improve patient safety: a scoping review
title_sort potential of artificial intelligence to improve patient safety: a scoping review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33742085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00423-6
work_keys_str_mv AT batesdavidw thepotentialofartificialintelligencetoimprovepatientsafetyascopingreview
AT levinedavid thepotentialofartificialintelligencetoimprovepatientsafetyascopingreview
AT syrowatkaania thepotentialofartificialintelligencetoimprovepatientsafetyascopingreview
AT kuznetsovamasha thepotentialofartificialintelligencetoimprovepatientsafetyascopingreview
AT craigkellyjeanthomas thepotentialofartificialintelligencetoimprovepatientsafetyascopingreview
AT ruiangela thepotentialofartificialintelligencetoimprovepatientsafetyascopingreview
AT jacksongretchenpurcell thepotentialofartificialintelligencetoimprovepatientsafetyascopingreview
AT rheekyu thepotentialofartificialintelligencetoimprovepatientsafetyascopingreview
AT batesdavidw potentialofartificialintelligencetoimprovepatientsafetyascopingreview
AT levinedavid potentialofartificialintelligencetoimprovepatientsafetyascopingreview
AT syrowatkaania potentialofartificialintelligencetoimprovepatientsafetyascopingreview
AT kuznetsovamasha potentialofartificialintelligencetoimprovepatientsafetyascopingreview
AT craigkellyjeanthomas potentialofartificialintelligencetoimprovepatientsafetyascopingreview
AT ruiangela potentialofartificialintelligencetoimprovepatientsafetyascopingreview
AT jacksongretchenpurcell potentialofartificialintelligencetoimprovepatientsafetyascopingreview
AT rheekyu potentialofartificialintelligencetoimprovepatientsafetyascopingreview