Cargando…
Distant metastasis time to event analysis with CNNs in independent head and neck cancer cohorts
Deep learning models based on medical images play an increasingly important role for cancer outcome prediction. The standard approach involves usage of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to automatically extract relevant features from the patient’s image and perform a binary classification of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33742070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85671-y |
_version_ | 1783667332386652160 |
---|---|
author | Lombardo, Elia Kurz, Christopher Marschner, Sebastian Avanzo, Michele Gagliardi, Vito Fanetti, Giuseppe Franchin, Giovanni Stancanello, Joseph Corradini, Stefanie Niyazi, Maximilian Belka, Claus Parodi, Katia Riboldi, Marco Landry, Guillaume |
author_facet | Lombardo, Elia Kurz, Christopher Marschner, Sebastian Avanzo, Michele Gagliardi, Vito Fanetti, Giuseppe Franchin, Giovanni Stancanello, Joseph Corradini, Stefanie Niyazi, Maximilian Belka, Claus Parodi, Katia Riboldi, Marco Landry, Guillaume |
author_sort | Lombardo, Elia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Deep learning models based on medical images play an increasingly important role for cancer outcome prediction. The standard approach involves usage of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to automatically extract relevant features from the patient’s image and perform a binary classification of the occurrence of a given clinical endpoint. In this work, a 2D-CNN and a 3D-CNN for the binary classification of distant metastasis (DM) occurrence in head and neck cancer patients were extended to perform time-to-event analysis. The newly built CNNs incorporate censoring information and output DM-free probability curves as a function of time for every patient. In total, 1037 patients were used to build and assess the performance of the time-to-event model. Training and validation was based on 294 patients also used in a previous benchmark classification study while for testing 743 patients from three independent cohorts were used. The best network could reproduce the good results from 3-fold cross validation [Harrell’s concordance indices (HCIs) of 0.78, 0.74 and 0.80] in two out of three testing cohorts (HCIs of 0.88, 0.67 and 0.77). Additionally, the capability of the models for patient stratification into high and low-risk groups was investigated, the CNNs being able to significantly stratify all three testing cohorts. Results suggest that image-based deep learning models show good reliability for DM time-to-event analysis and could be used for treatment personalisation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7979766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79797662021-03-25 Distant metastasis time to event analysis with CNNs in independent head and neck cancer cohorts Lombardo, Elia Kurz, Christopher Marschner, Sebastian Avanzo, Michele Gagliardi, Vito Fanetti, Giuseppe Franchin, Giovanni Stancanello, Joseph Corradini, Stefanie Niyazi, Maximilian Belka, Claus Parodi, Katia Riboldi, Marco Landry, Guillaume Sci Rep Article Deep learning models based on medical images play an increasingly important role for cancer outcome prediction. The standard approach involves usage of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to automatically extract relevant features from the patient’s image and perform a binary classification of the occurrence of a given clinical endpoint. In this work, a 2D-CNN and a 3D-CNN for the binary classification of distant metastasis (DM) occurrence in head and neck cancer patients were extended to perform time-to-event analysis. The newly built CNNs incorporate censoring information and output DM-free probability curves as a function of time for every patient. In total, 1037 patients were used to build and assess the performance of the time-to-event model. Training and validation was based on 294 patients also used in a previous benchmark classification study while for testing 743 patients from three independent cohorts were used. The best network could reproduce the good results from 3-fold cross validation [Harrell’s concordance indices (HCIs) of 0.78, 0.74 and 0.80] in two out of three testing cohorts (HCIs of 0.88, 0.67 and 0.77). Additionally, the capability of the models for patient stratification into high and low-risk groups was investigated, the CNNs being able to significantly stratify all three testing cohorts. Results suggest that image-based deep learning models show good reliability for DM time-to-event analysis and could be used for treatment personalisation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7979766/ /pubmed/33742070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85671-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Lombardo, Elia Kurz, Christopher Marschner, Sebastian Avanzo, Michele Gagliardi, Vito Fanetti, Giuseppe Franchin, Giovanni Stancanello, Joseph Corradini, Stefanie Niyazi, Maximilian Belka, Claus Parodi, Katia Riboldi, Marco Landry, Guillaume Distant metastasis time to event analysis with CNNs in independent head and neck cancer cohorts |
title | Distant metastasis time to event analysis with CNNs in independent head and neck cancer cohorts |
title_full | Distant metastasis time to event analysis with CNNs in independent head and neck cancer cohorts |
title_fullStr | Distant metastasis time to event analysis with CNNs in independent head and neck cancer cohorts |
title_full_unstemmed | Distant metastasis time to event analysis with CNNs in independent head and neck cancer cohorts |
title_short | Distant metastasis time to event analysis with CNNs in independent head and neck cancer cohorts |
title_sort | distant metastasis time to event analysis with cnns in independent head and neck cancer cohorts |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33742070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85671-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lombardoelia distantmetastasistimetoeventanalysiswithcnnsinindependentheadandneckcancercohorts AT kurzchristopher distantmetastasistimetoeventanalysiswithcnnsinindependentheadandneckcancercohorts AT marschnersebastian distantmetastasistimetoeventanalysiswithcnnsinindependentheadandneckcancercohorts AT avanzomichele distantmetastasistimetoeventanalysiswithcnnsinindependentheadandneckcancercohorts AT gagliardivito distantmetastasistimetoeventanalysiswithcnnsinindependentheadandneckcancercohorts AT fanettigiuseppe distantmetastasistimetoeventanalysiswithcnnsinindependentheadandneckcancercohorts AT franchingiovanni distantmetastasistimetoeventanalysiswithcnnsinindependentheadandneckcancercohorts AT stancanellojoseph distantmetastasistimetoeventanalysiswithcnnsinindependentheadandneckcancercohorts AT corradinistefanie distantmetastasistimetoeventanalysiswithcnnsinindependentheadandneckcancercohorts AT niyazimaximilian distantmetastasistimetoeventanalysiswithcnnsinindependentheadandneckcancercohorts AT belkaclaus distantmetastasistimetoeventanalysiswithcnnsinindependentheadandneckcancercohorts AT parodikatia distantmetastasistimetoeventanalysiswithcnnsinindependentheadandneckcancercohorts AT riboldimarco distantmetastasistimetoeventanalysiswithcnnsinindependentheadandneckcancercohorts AT landryguillaume distantmetastasistimetoeventanalysiswithcnnsinindependentheadandneckcancercohorts |