Cargando…

What Visual Targets Are Viewed by Users With a Handheld Mobile Magnifier App

PURPOSE: Mobile video magnifier apps are used by many visually impaired people for seeing details that are beyond their visual capacity. Understanding the common types of visual targets will be importantly informative for low-vision research and assistive technology development. This study addressed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Luo, Gang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7980048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34003950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.3.16
_version_ 1783667372423380992
author Luo, Gang
author_facet Luo, Gang
author_sort Luo, Gang
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Mobile video magnifier apps are used by many visually impaired people for seeing details that are beyond their visual capacity. Understanding the common types of visual targets will be importantly informative for low-vision research and assistive technology development. This study addressed this question through analysis of images captured by magnifier app users pursuing their daily activities. METHODS: An iOS magnifier app, free to the public, was used to capture and upload images to the Azure Computer Vision cloud service for object recognition. Returned object tag results for each image were uploaded to the Umeng analytics server for aggregated tallies. Consolidated data from 24,295 users across 1 month were analyzed. More than 1300 types of object tags found in 152,819 images were grouped into 11 categories. The data collection and analyses were conducted separately for users who toggled on or off iOS vision-accessibility features. RESULTS: For accessibility and nonaccessibility user groups, 60% to 70% of objects were nontextual, such as an indoor scene, human, or art. More than 40% of the images contained more than one object category. Accessibility users viewed textual objects more frequently than nonaccessibility users (41.1% vs. 29.8%), but overall, the probability ranking of categories was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nontextual objects make up a major portion of visual needs of magnifier users across a wide range of vision loss. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Low-vision research and vision assistance technology development should address the need for nontextual object viewing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7980048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79800482021-03-26 What Visual Targets Are Viewed by Users With a Handheld Mobile Magnifier App Luo, Gang Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: Mobile video magnifier apps are used by many visually impaired people for seeing details that are beyond their visual capacity. Understanding the common types of visual targets will be importantly informative for low-vision research and assistive technology development. This study addressed this question through analysis of images captured by magnifier app users pursuing their daily activities. METHODS: An iOS magnifier app, free to the public, was used to capture and upload images to the Azure Computer Vision cloud service for object recognition. Returned object tag results for each image were uploaded to the Umeng analytics server for aggregated tallies. Consolidated data from 24,295 users across 1 month were analyzed. More than 1300 types of object tags found in 152,819 images were grouped into 11 categories. The data collection and analyses were conducted separately for users who toggled on or off iOS vision-accessibility features. RESULTS: For accessibility and nonaccessibility user groups, 60% to 70% of objects were nontextual, such as an indoor scene, human, or art. More than 40% of the images contained more than one object category. Accessibility users viewed textual objects more frequently than nonaccessibility users (41.1% vs. 29.8%), but overall, the probability ranking of categories was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nontextual objects make up a major portion of visual needs of magnifier users across a wide range of vision loss. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Low-vision research and vision assistance technology development should address the need for nontextual object viewing. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7980048/ /pubmed/34003950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.3.16 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Luo, Gang
What Visual Targets Are Viewed by Users With a Handheld Mobile Magnifier App
title What Visual Targets Are Viewed by Users With a Handheld Mobile Magnifier App
title_full What Visual Targets Are Viewed by Users With a Handheld Mobile Magnifier App
title_fullStr What Visual Targets Are Viewed by Users With a Handheld Mobile Magnifier App
title_full_unstemmed What Visual Targets Are Viewed by Users With a Handheld Mobile Magnifier App
title_short What Visual Targets Are Viewed by Users With a Handheld Mobile Magnifier App
title_sort what visual targets are viewed by users with a handheld mobile magnifier app
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7980048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34003950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.3.16
work_keys_str_mv AT luogang whatvisualtargetsareviewedbyuserswithahandheldmobilemagnifierapp