Cargando…

Controversies in ameloblastoma management: evaluation of decision making, based on a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: The ameloblastoma management is still challenging to the high recurrence rates and significant morbidity associated with radical treatment. The purpose of this 10-year retrospective study was to analyze the influence of ameloblastoma type and treatment strategy on the long-term outcomes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hresko, Andrii, Burtyn, Olga, Pavlovskiy, Leonid, Snisarevskyi, Pavlo, Lapshyna, Julia, Chepurnyi, Yurii, Kopchak, Andrii, Karagozoglu, K. Hakki, Forouzanfar, Tymour
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7980285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33037802
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.24104
_version_ 1783667414625419264
author Hresko, Andrii
Burtyn, Olga
Pavlovskiy, Leonid
Snisarevskyi, Pavlo
Lapshyna, Julia
Chepurnyi, Yurii
Kopchak, Andrii
Karagozoglu, K. Hakki
Forouzanfar, Tymour
author_facet Hresko, Andrii
Burtyn, Olga
Pavlovskiy, Leonid
Snisarevskyi, Pavlo
Lapshyna, Julia
Chepurnyi, Yurii
Kopchak, Andrii
Karagozoglu, K. Hakki
Forouzanfar, Tymour
author_sort Hresko, Andrii
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ameloblastoma management is still challenging to the high recurrence rates and significant morbidity associated with radical treatment. The purpose of this 10-year retrospective study was to analyze the influence of ameloblastoma type and treatment strategy on the long-term outcomes and recurrence rates. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective analyses of 64 histologically-confirmed ameloblastoma cases was performed. The possible risk factors for recurrence and the development of complications were estimated statistically. RESULTS: The treatment strategy applied for this group of patients was the following: thirty-four patients (53.1%) were treated conservatively with enucleation or extended bone curettage. Radical treatment (bone resection) was applied in 30 (46.9%) cases. The follow-up period ranged from 2 to 10 years (mean value 4.28 ± 3,26). General recurrence rate consisted 32.8%. This study did not find significant correlations between clinical or histopathological features of the ameloblastoma and the recurrence rate. The only factor that significantly influence recurrence rate was the treatment strategy (41% in conservative treatment vs 15% in radical treatment, p<0.05). Postoperative complications were observed in 42 patients (65.6%) and included face asymmetry and disfigurement (17.2%), temporary paresthesia of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) - 23.4%, permanent paresthesia of IAN - 20.3%, paresis of a marginal branch of the facial nerve - 6.3%, infection 12.5%, and swelling - 20.3%. The complication rates, esthetic and functional deficiency were significantly higher in radically treated patients (p<0.05) CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that higher recurrence rate is associated with conservative treatment for ameloblastoma, while radical treatment leads to an increased number of postoperative complications that affect the patient's quality of life. Key words:Ameloblastoma, ameloblastoma recurrence, odontogenic tumor, oral pathology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7980285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79802852021-03-24 Controversies in ameloblastoma management: evaluation of decision making, based on a retrospective analysis Hresko, Andrii Burtyn, Olga Pavlovskiy, Leonid Snisarevskyi, Pavlo Lapshyna, Julia Chepurnyi, Yurii Kopchak, Andrii Karagozoglu, K. Hakki Forouzanfar, Tymour Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Research BACKGROUND: The ameloblastoma management is still challenging to the high recurrence rates and significant morbidity associated with radical treatment. The purpose of this 10-year retrospective study was to analyze the influence of ameloblastoma type and treatment strategy on the long-term outcomes and recurrence rates. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective analyses of 64 histologically-confirmed ameloblastoma cases was performed. The possible risk factors for recurrence and the development of complications were estimated statistically. RESULTS: The treatment strategy applied for this group of patients was the following: thirty-four patients (53.1%) were treated conservatively with enucleation or extended bone curettage. Radical treatment (bone resection) was applied in 30 (46.9%) cases. The follow-up period ranged from 2 to 10 years (mean value 4.28 ± 3,26). General recurrence rate consisted 32.8%. This study did not find significant correlations between clinical or histopathological features of the ameloblastoma and the recurrence rate. The only factor that significantly influence recurrence rate was the treatment strategy (41% in conservative treatment vs 15% in radical treatment, p<0.05). Postoperative complications were observed in 42 patients (65.6%) and included face asymmetry and disfigurement (17.2%), temporary paresthesia of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) - 23.4%, permanent paresthesia of IAN - 20.3%, paresis of a marginal branch of the facial nerve - 6.3%, infection 12.5%, and swelling - 20.3%. The complication rates, esthetic and functional deficiency were significantly higher in radically treated patients (p<0.05) CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that higher recurrence rate is associated with conservative treatment for ameloblastoma, while radical treatment leads to an increased number of postoperative complications that affect the patient's quality of life. Key words:Ameloblastoma, ameloblastoma recurrence, odontogenic tumor, oral pathology. Medicina Oral S.L. 2021-03 2020-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7980285/ /pubmed/33037802 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.24104 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Medicina Oral S.L. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Hresko, Andrii
Burtyn, Olga
Pavlovskiy, Leonid
Snisarevskyi, Pavlo
Lapshyna, Julia
Chepurnyi, Yurii
Kopchak, Andrii
Karagozoglu, K. Hakki
Forouzanfar, Tymour
Controversies in ameloblastoma management: evaluation of decision making, based on a retrospective analysis
title Controversies in ameloblastoma management: evaluation of decision making, based on a retrospective analysis
title_full Controversies in ameloblastoma management: evaluation of decision making, based on a retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Controversies in ameloblastoma management: evaluation of decision making, based on a retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Controversies in ameloblastoma management: evaluation of decision making, based on a retrospective analysis
title_short Controversies in ameloblastoma management: evaluation of decision making, based on a retrospective analysis
title_sort controversies in ameloblastoma management: evaluation of decision making, based on a retrospective analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7980285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33037802
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.24104
work_keys_str_mv AT hreskoandrii controversiesinameloblastomamanagementevaluationofdecisionmakingbasedonaretrospectiveanalysis
AT burtynolga controversiesinameloblastomamanagementevaluationofdecisionmakingbasedonaretrospectiveanalysis
AT pavlovskiyleonid controversiesinameloblastomamanagementevaluationofdecisionmakingbasedonaretrospectiveanalysis
AT snisarevskyipavlo controversiesinameloblastomamanagementevaluationofdecisionmakingbasedonaretrospectiveanalysis
AT lapshynajulia controversiesinameloblastomamanagementevaluationofdecisionmakingbasedonaretrospectiveanalysis
AT chepurnyiyurii controversiesinameloblastomamanagementevaluationofdecisionmakingbasedonaretrospectiveanalysis
AT kopchakandrii controversiesinameloblastomamanagementevaluationofdecisionmakingbasedonaretrospectiveanalysis
AT karagozoglukhakki controversiesinameloblastomamanagementevaluationofdecisionmakingbasedonaretrospectiveanalysis
AT forouzanfartymour controversiesinameloblastomamanagementevaluationofdecisionmakingbasedonaretrospectiveanalysis