Cargando…

Efficacy of second-line treatment and prognostic factors in patients with advanced malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma has not been established, and systemic chemotherapy is administered according to malignant pleural mesothelioma. We previously reported the efficacy of cisplatin plus pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy; however, the efficacy of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitadai, Rui, Shimoi, Tatsunori, Sudo, Kazuki, Noguchi, Emi, Nagata, Yusuke, Sawada, Ryoichi, Takashima, Atsuo, Boku, Narikazu, Yonemori, Kan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7980334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33743636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08025-x
_version_ 1783667425348157440
author Kitadai, Rui
Shimoi, Tatsunori
Sudo, Kazuki
Noguchi, Emi
Nagata, Yusuke
Sawada, Ryoichi
Takashima, Atsuo
Boku, Narikazu
Yonemori, Kan
author_facet Kitadai, Rui
Shimoi, Tatsunori
Sudo, Kazuki
Noguchi, Emi
Nagata, Yusuke
Sawada, Ryoichi
Takashima, Atsuo
Boku, Narikazu
Yonemori, Kan
author_sort Kitadai, Rui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma has not been established, and systemic chemotherapy is administered according to malignant pleural mesothelioma. We previously reported the efficacy of cisplatin plus pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy; however, the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy remains unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma who started first-line systemic chemotherapy with platinum plus pemetrexed between March 2007 and February 2019 at the National Cancer Center Hospital. Patients who received second-line chemotherapy after failure of platinum plus pemetrexed were identified. We evaluated the efficacy of first- and second-line chemotherapy, and explored the prognostic factors. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and between-group differences were compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 54 and 26 patients received platinum plus pemetrexed as first- and second-line chemotherapy, respectively (gemcitabine in 12 patients; taxane, six; nivolumab, three; and others, five). In all patients, the median overall survival and progression-free survival after first-line chemotherapy were 16.6 and 7.3 months, respectively. Among patients who received second-line chemotherapy, the median overall survival, progression-free survival, and second-line overall survival were 16.9, 3.2, and 9.9 months, respectively. Patients who received ≥6 cycles of platinum plus pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy had longer overall survival after second-line chemotherapy than those who did not (hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval: 0.06–0.82; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Second-line chemotherapy may be an option for refractory malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, especially in patients who have completed 6 cycles of platinum plus pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08025-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7980334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79803342021-03-22 Efficacy of second-line treatment and prognostic factors in patients with advanced malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a retrospective study Kitadai, Rui Shimoi, Tatsunori Sudo, Kazuki Noguchi, Emi Nagata, Yusuke Sawada, Ryoichi Takashima, Atsuo Boku, Narikazu Yonemori, Kan BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma has not been established, and systemic chemotherapy is administered according to malignant pleural mesothelioma. We previously reported the efficacy of cisplatin plus pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy; however, the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy remains unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma who started first-line systemic chemotherapy with platinum plus pemetrexed between March 2007 and February 2019 at the National Cancer Center Hospital. Patients who received second-line chemotherapy after failure of platinum plus pemetrexed were identified. We evaluated the efficacy of first- and second-line chemotherapy, and explored the prognostic factors. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and between-group differences were compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 54 and 26 patients received platinum plus pemetrexed as first- and second-line chemotherapy, respectively (gemcitabine in 12 patients; taxane, six; nivolumab, three; and others, five). In all patients, the median overall survival and progression-free survival after first-line chemotherapy were 16.6 and 7.3 months, respectively. Among patients who received second-line chemotherapy, the median overall survival, progression-free survival, and second-line overall survival were 16.9, 3.2, and 9.9 months, respectively. Patients who received ≥6 cycles of platinum plus pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy had longer overall survival after second-line chemotherapy than those who did not (hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval: 0.06–0.82; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Second-line chemotherapy may be an option for refractory malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, especially in patients who have completed 6 cycles of platinum plus pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08025-x. BioMed Central 2021-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7980334/ /pubmed/33743636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08025-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kitadai, Rui
Shimoi, Tatsunori
Sudo, Kazuki
Noguchi, Emi
Nagata, Yusuke
Sawada, Ryoichi
Takashima, Atsuo
Boku, Narikazu
Yonemori, Kan
Efficacy of second-line treatment and prognostic factors in patients with advanced malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a retrospective study
title Efficacy of second-line treatment and prognostic factors in patients with advanced malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a retrospective study
title_full Efficacy of second-line treatment and prognostic factors in patients with advanced malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Efficacy of second-line treatment and prognostic factors in patients with advanced malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of second-line treatment and prognostic factors in patients with advanced malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a retrospective study
title_short Efficacy of second-line treatment and prognostic factors in patients with advanced malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a retrospective study
title_sort efficacy of second-line treatment and prognostic factors in patients with advanced malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7980334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33743636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08025-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kitadairui efficacyofsecondlinetreatmentandprognosticfactorsinpatientswithadvancedmalignantperitonealmesotheliomaaretrospectivestudy
AT shimoitatsunori efficacyofsecondlinetreatmentandprognosticfactorsinpatientswithadvancedmalignantperitonealmesotheliomaaretrospectivestudy
AT sudokazuki efficacyofsecondlinetreatmentandprognosticfactorsinpatientswithadvancedmalignantperitonealmesotheliomaaretrospectivestudy
AT noguchiemi efficacyofsecondlinetreatmentandprognosticfactorsinpatientswithadvancedmalignantperitonealmesotheliomaaretrospectivestudy
AT nagatayusuke efficacyofsecondlinetreatmentandprognosticfactorsinpatientswithadvancedmalignantperitonealmesotheliomaaretrospectivestudy
AT sawadaryoichi efficacyofsecondlinetreatmentandprognosticfactorsinpatientswithadvancedmalignantperitonealmesotheliomaaretrospectivestudy
AT takashimaatsuo efficacyofsecondlinetreatmentandprognosticfactorsinpatientswithadvancedmalignantperitonealmesotheliomaaretrospectivestudy
AT bokunarikazu efficacyofsecondlinetreatmentandprognosticfactorsinpatientswithadvancedmalignantperitonealmesotheliomaaretrospectivestudy
AT yonemorikan efficacyofsecondlinetreatmentandprognosticfactorsinpatientswithadvancedmalignantperitonealmesotheliomaaretrospectivestudy