Cargando…
Efficacy of second-line treatment and prognostic factors in patients with advanced malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a retrospective study
BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma has not been established, and systemic chemotherapy is administered according to malignant pleural mesothelioma. We previously reported the efficacy of cisplatin plus pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy; however, the efficacy of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7980334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33743636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08025-x |
_version_ | 1783667425348157440 |
---|---|
author | Kitadai, Rui Shimoi, Tatsunori Sudo, Kazuki Noguchi, Emi Nagata, Yusuke Sawada, Ryoichi Takashima, Atsuo Boku, Narikazu Yonemori, Kan |
author_facet | Kitadai, Rui Shimoi, Tatsunori Sudo, Kazuki Noguchi, Emi Nagata, Yusuke Sawada, Ryoichi Takashima, Atsuo Boku, Narikazu Yonemori, Kan |
author_sort | Kitadai, Rui |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma has not been established, and systemic chemotherapy is administered according to malignant pleural mesothelioma. We previously reported the efficacy of cisplatin plus pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy; however, the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy remains unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma who started first-line systemic chemotherapy with platinum plus pemetrexed between March 2007 and February 2019 at the National Cancer Center Hospital. Patients who received second-line chemotherapy after failure of platinum plus pemetrexed were identified. We evaluated the efficacy of first- and second-line chemotherapy, and explored the prognostic factors. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and between-group differences were compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 54 and 26 patients received platinum plus pemetrexed as first- and second-line chemotherapy, respectively (gemcitabine in 12 patients; taxane, six; nivolumab, three; and others, five). In all patients, the median overall survival and progression-free survival after first-line chemotherapy were 16.6 and 7.3 months, respectively. Among patients who received second-line chemotherapy, the median overall survival, progression-free survival, and second-line overall survival were 16.9, 3.2, and 9.9 months, respectively. Patients who received ≥6 cycles of platinum plus pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy had longer overall survival after second-line chemotherapy than those who did not (hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval: 0.06–0.82; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Second-line chemotherapy may be an option for refractory malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, especially in patients who have completed 6 cycles of platinum plus pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08025-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7980334 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79803342021-03-22 Efficacy of second-line treatment and prognostic factors in patients with advanced malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a retrospective study Kitadai, Rui Shimoi, Tatsunori Sudo, Kazuki Noguchi, Emi Nagata, Yusuke Sawada, Ryoichi Takashima, Atsuo Boku, Narikazu Yonemori, Kan BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma has not been established, and systemic chemotherapy is administered according to malignant pleural mesothelioma. We previously reported the efficacy of cisplatin plus pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy; however, the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy remains unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma who started first-line systemic chemotherapy with platinum plus pemetrexed between March 2007 and February 2019 at the National Cancer Center Hospital. Patients who received second-line chemotherapy after failure of platinum plus pemetrexed were identified. We evaluated the efficacy of first- and second-line chemotherapy, and explored the prognostic factors. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and between-group differences were compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 54 and 26 patients received platinum plus pemetrexed as first- and second-line chemotherapy, respectively (gemcitabine in 12 patients; taxane, six; nivolumab, three; and others, five). In all patients, the median overall survival and progression-free survival after first-line chemotherapy were 16.6 and 7.3 months, respectively. Among patients who received second-line chemotherapy, the median overall survival, progression-free survival, and second-line overall survival were 16.9, 3.2, and 9.9 months, respectively. Patients who received ≥6 cycles of platinum plus pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy had longer overall survival after second-line chemotherapy than those who did not (hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval: 0.06–0.82; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Second-line chemotherapy may be an option for refractory malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, especially in patients who have completed 6 cycles of platinum plus pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08025-x. BioMed Central 2021-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7980334/ /pubmed/33743636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08025-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kitadai, Rui Shimoi, Tatsunori Sudo, Kazuki Noguchi, Emi Nagata, Yusuke Sawada, Ryoichi Takashima, Atsuo Boku, Narikazu Yonemori, Kan Efficacy of second-line treatment and prognostic factors in patients with advanced malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a retrospective study |
title | Efficacy of second-line treatment and prognostic factors in patients with advanced malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a retrospective study |
title_full | Efficacy of second-line treatment and prognostic factors in patients with advanced malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of second-line treatment and prognostic factors in patients with advanced malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of second-line treatment and prognostic factors in patients with advanced malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a retrospective study |
title_short | Efficacy of second-line treatment and prognostic factors in patients with advanced malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a retrospective study |
title_sort | efficacy of second-line treatment and prognostic factors in patients with advanced malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a retrospective study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7980334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33743636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08025-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kitadairui efficacyofsecondlinetreatmentandprognosticfactorsinpatientswithadvancedmalignantperitonealmesotheliomaaretrospectivestudy AT shimoitatsunori efficacyofsecondlinetreatmentandprognosticfactorsinpatientswithadvancedmalignantperitonealmesotheliomaaretrospectivestudy AT sudokazuki efficacyofsecondlinetreatmentandprognosticfactorsinpatientswithadvancedmalignantperitonealmesotheliomaaretrospectivestudy AT noguchiemi efficacyofsecondlinetreatmentandprognosticfactorsinpatientswithadvancedmalignantperitonealmesotheliomaaretrospectivestudy AT nagatayusuke efficacyofsecondlinetreatmentandprognosticfactorsinpatientswithadvancedmalignantperitonealmesotheliomaaretrospectivestudy AT sawadaryoichi efficacyofsecondlinetreatmentandprognosticfactorsinpatientswithadvancedmalignantperitonealmesotheliomaaretrospectivestudy AT takashimaatsuo efficacyofsecondlinetreatmentandprognosticfactorsinpatientswithadvancedmalignantperitonealmesotheliomaaretrospectivestudy AT bokunarikazu efficacyofsecondlinetreatmentandprognosticfactorsinpatientswithadvancedmalignantperitonealmesotheliomaaretrospectivestudy AT yonemorikan efficacyofsecondlinetreatmentandprognosticfactorsinpatientswithadvancedmalignantperitonealmesotheliomaaretrospectivestudy |