Cargando…

Continuous non‐contact respiratory rate and tidal volume monitoring using a Depth Sensing Camera

The monitoring of respiratory parameters is important across many areas of care within the hospital. Here we report on the performance of a depth-sensing camera system for the continuous non-contact monitoring of Respiratory Rate (RR) and Tidal Volume (TV), where these parameters were compared to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Addison, Paul S., Smit, Philip, Jacquel, Dominique, Addison, Anthony P., Miller, Cyndy, Kimm, Gardner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7980749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33743106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-021-00691-3
_version_ 1783667487152275456
author Addison, Paul S.
Smit, Philip
Jacquel, Dominique
Addison, Anthony P.
Miller, Cyndy
Kimm, Gardner
author_facet Addison, Paul S.
Smit, Philip
Jacquel, Dominique
Addison, Anthony P.
Miller, Cyndy
Kimm, Gardner
author_sort Addison, Paul S.
collection PubMed
description The monitoring of respiratory parameters is important across many areas of care within the hospital. Here we report on the performance of a depth-sensing camera system for the continuous non-contact monitoring of Respiratory Rate (RR) and Tidal Volume (TV), where these parameters were compared to a ventilator reference. Depth sensing data streams were acquired and processed over a series of runs on a single volunteer comprising a range of respiratory rates and tidal volumes to generate depth-based respiratory rate (RR(depth)) and tidal volume (TV(depth)) estimates. The bias and root mean squared difference (RMSD) accuracy between RR(depth) and the ventilator reference, RR(vent), across the whole data set was found to be -0.02 breaths/min and 0.51 breaths/min respectively. The least squares fit regression equation was determined to be: RR(depth) = 0.96 × RR(vent) + 0.57 breaths/min and the resulting Pearson correlation coefficient, R, was 0.98 (p < 0.001). Correspondingly, the bias and root mean squared difference (RMSD) accuracy between TV(depth) and the reference TV(vent) across the whole data set was found to be − 0.21 L and 0.23 L respectively. The least squares fit regression equation was determined to be: TV(depth) = 0.79 × TV(vent)—0.01 L and the resulting Pearson correlation coefficient, R, was 0.92 (p < 0.001). In conclusion, a high degree of agreement was found between the depth-based respiration rate and its ventilator reference, indicating that RR(depth) is a promising modality for the accurate non-contact respiratory rate monitoring in the clinical setting. In addition, a high degree of correlation between depth-based tidal volume and its ventilator reference was found, indicating that TV(depth) may provide a useful monitor of tidal volume trending in practice. Future work should aim to further test these parameters in the clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7980749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79807492021-03-23 Continuous non‐contact respiratory rate and tidal volume monitoring using a Depth Sensing Camera Addison, Paul S. Smit, Philip Jacquel, Dominique Addison, Anthony P. Miller, Cyndy Kimm, Gardner J Clin Monit Comput Original Research The monitoring of respiratory parameters is important across many areas of care within the hospital. Here we report on the performance of a depth-sensing camera system for the continuous non-contact monitoring of Respiratory Rate (RR) and Tidal Volume (TV), where these parameters were compared to a ventilator reference. Depth sensing data streams were acquired and processed over a series of runs on a single volunteer comprising a range of respiratory rates and tidal volumes to generate depth-based respiratory rate (RR(depth)) and tidal volume (TV(depth)) estimates. The bias and root mean squared difference (RMSD) accuracy between RR(depth) and the ventilator reference, RR(vent), across the whole data set was found to be -0.02 breaths/min and 0.51 breaths/min respectively. The least squares fit regression equation was determined to be: RR(depth) = 0.96 × RR(vent) + 0.57 breaths/min and the resulting Pearson correlation coefficient, R, was 0.98 (p < 0.001). Correspondingly, the bias and root mean squared difference (RMSD) accuracy between TV(depth) and the reference TV(vent) across the whole data set was found to be − 0.21 L and 0.23 L respectively. The least squares fit regression equation was determined to be: TV(depth) = 0.79 × TV(vent)—0.01 L and the resulting Pearson correlation coefficient, R, was 0.92 (p < 0.001). In conclusion, a high degree of agreement was found between the depth-based respiration rate and its ventilator reference, indicating that RR(depth) is a promising modality for the accurate non-contact respiratory rate monitoring in the clinical setting. In addition, a high degree of correlation between depth-based tidal volume and its ventilator reference was found, indicating that TV(depth) may provide a useful monitor of tidal volume trending in practice. Future work should aim to further test these parameters in the clinical setting. Springer Netherlands 2021-03-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC7980749/ /pubmed/33743106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-021-00691-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Addison, Paul S.
Smit, Philip
Jacquel, Dominique
Addison, Anthony P.
Miller, Cyndy
Kimm, Gardner
Continuous non‐contact respiratory rate and tidal volume monitoring using a Depth Sensing Camera
title Continuous non‐contact respiratory rate and tidal volume monitoring using a Depth Sensing Camera
title_full Continuous non‐contact respiratory rate and tidal volume monitoring using a Depth Sensing Camera
title_fullStr Continuous non‐contact respiratory rate and tidal volume monitoring using a Depth Sensing Camera
title_full_unstemmed Continuous non‐contact respiratory rate and tidal volume monitoring using a Depth Sensing Camera
title_short Continuous non‐contact respiratory rate and tidal volume monitoring using a Depth Sensing Camera
title_sort continuous non‐contact respiratory rate and tidal volume monitoring using a depth sensing camera
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7980749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33743106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-021-00691-3
work_keys_str_mv AT addisonpauls continuousnoncontactrespiratoryrateandtidalvolumemonitoringusingadepthsensingcamera
AT smitphilip continuousnoncontactrespiratoryrateandtidalvolumemonitoringusingadepthsensingcamera
AT jacqueldominique continuousnoncontactrespiratoryrateandtidalvolumemonitoringusingadepthsensingcamera
AT addisonanthonyp continuousnoncontactrespiratoryrateandtidalvolumemonitoringusingadepthsensingcamera
AT millercyndy continuousnoncontactrespiratoryrateandtidalvolumemonitoringusingadepthsensingcamera
AT kimmgardner continuousnoncontactrespiratoryrateandtidalvolumemonitoringusingadepthsensingcamera