Cargando…

Time-of-Day Differences in Treatment-Related Habit Strength and Adherence

BACKGROUND: Many of our daily behaviors are habitual, occurring automatically in response to learned contextual cues, and with minimal need for cognitive and self-regulatory resources. Behavioral habit strength predicts adherence to actions, including to medications. The time of day (morning vs. eve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phillips, L Alison, Burns, Edith, Leventhal, Howard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7980763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32542355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaaa042
_version_ 1783667489070120960
author Phillips, L Alison
Burns, Edith
Leventhal, Howard
author_facet Phillips, L Alison
Burns, Edith
Leventhal, Howard
author_sort Phillips, L Alison
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many of our daily behaviors are habitual, occurring automatically in response to learned contextual cues, and with minimal need for cognitive and self-regulatory resources. Behavioral habit strength predicts adherence to actions, including to medications. The time of day (morning vs. evening) may influence adherence and habit strength to the degree that stability of contexts/routines varies throughout the day. PURPOSE: The current study evaluates whether patients are more adherent to morning versus evening doses of medication and if morning doses show evidence of greater habit strength than evening doses. METHODS: Objective adherence data (exact timing of pill dosing) were collected in an observational study by electronic monitoring pill bottles in a sample of patients on twice-daily pills for Type 2 diabetes (N = 51) over the course of 1 month. RESULTS: Data supported the hypothesis that patients would miss fewer morning than evening pills. However, counter to the hypothesis, variability in dose timing (an indicator of habit strength) was not significantly different for morning versus evening pills. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that medication adherence may be greater in the morning than in the evening. However, more research is needed to evaluate the role of habitual action in this greater adherence. Furthermore, future research should evaluate the validity of behavioral timing consistency as an indicator of habit strength.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7980763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79807632021-03-24 Time-of-Day Differences in Treatment-Related Habit Strength and Adherence Phillips, L Alison Burns, Edith Leventhal, Howard Ann Behav Med Brief Report BACKGROUND: Many of our daily behaviors are habitual, occurring automatically in response to learned contextual cues, and with minimal need for cognitive and self-regulatory resources. Behavioral habit strength predicts adherence to actions, including to medications. The time of day (morning vs. evening) may influence adherence and habit strength to the degree that stability of contexts/routines varies throughout the day. PURPOSE: The current study evaluates whether patients are more adherent to morning versus evening doses of medication and if morning doses show evidence of greater habit strength than evening doses. METHODS: Objective adherence data (exact timing of pill dosing) were collected in an observational study by electronic monitoring pill bottles in a sample of patients on twice-daily pills for Type 2 diabetes (N = 51) over the course of 1 month. RESULTS: Data supported the hypothesis that patients would miss fewer morning than evening pills. However, counter to the hypothesis, variability in dose timing (an indicator of habit strength) was not significantly different for morning versus evening pills. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that medication adherence may be greater in the morning than in the evening. However, more research is needed to evaluate the role of habitual action in this greater adherence. Furthermore, future research should evaluate the validity of behavioral timing consistency as an indicator of habit strength. Oxford University Press 2020-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7980763/ /pubmed/32542355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaaa042 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Behavioral Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Brief Report
Phillips, L Alison
Burns, Edith
Leventhal, Howard
Time-of-Day Differences in Treatment-Related Habit Strength and Adherence
title Time-of-Day Differences in Treatment-Related Habit Strength and Adherence
title_full Time-of-Day Differences in Treatment-Related Habit Strength and Adherence
title_fullStr Time-of-Day Differences in Treatment-Related Habit Strength and Adherence
title_full_unstemmed Time-of-Day Differences in Treatment-Related Habit Strength and Adherence
title_short Time-of-Day Differences in Treatment-Related Habit Strength and Adherence
title_sort time-of-day differences in treatment-related habit strength and adherence
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7980763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32542355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaaa042
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipslalison timeofdaydifferencesintreatmentrelatedhabitstrengthandadherence
AT burnsedith timeofdaydifferencesintreatmentrelatedhabitstrengthandadherence
AT leventhalhoward timeofdaydifferencesintreatmentrelatedhabitstrengthandadherence