Cargando…

Towards systematic nomenclature for cell-free DNA

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has become widely recognized as a promising candidate biomarker for minimally invasive characterization of various genomic disorders and other clinical scenarios. However, among the obstacles that currently challenge the general progression of the research field, there remains...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bronkhorst, Abel J., Ungerer, Vida, Diehl, Frank, Anker, Philippe, Dor, Yuval, Fleischhacker, Michael, Gahan, Peter B., Hui, Lisa, Holdenrieder, Stefan, Thierry, Alain R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7981329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00439-020-02227-2
_version_ 1783667531475582976
author Bronkhorst, Abel J.
Ungerer, Vida
Diehl, Frank
Anker, Philippe
Dor, Yuval
Fleischhacker, Michael
Gahan, Peter B.
Hui, Lisa
Holdenrieder, Stefan
Thierry, Alain R.
author_facet Bronkhorst, Abel J.
Ungerer, Vida
Diehl, Frank
Anker, Philippe
Dor, Yuval
Fleischhacker, Michael
Gahan, Peter B.
Hui, Lisa
Holdenrieder, Stefan
Thierry, Alain R.
author_sort Bronkhorst, Abel J.
collection PubMed
description Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has become widely recognized as a promising candidate biomarker for minimally invasive characterization of various genomic disorders and other clinical scenarios. However, among the obstacles that currently challenge the general progression of the research field, there remains an unmet need for unambiguous universal cfDNA nomenclature. To address this shortcoming, we classify in this report the different types of cfDNA molecules that occur in the human body based on its origin, genetic traits, and locality. We proceed by assigning existing terms to each of these cfDNA subtypes, while proposing new terms and abbreviations where clarity is lacking and more precise stratification would be beneficial. We then suggest the proper usage of these terms within different contexts and scenarios, focusing mainly on the nomenclature as it relates to the domains of oncology, prenatal testing, and post-transplant surgery surveillance. We hope that these recommendations will serve as useful considerations towards the establishment of universal cfDNA nomenclature in the future. In addition, it is conceivable that many of these recommendations can be transposed to cell-free RNA nomenclature by simply exchanging “DNA” with “RNA” in each acronym/abbreviation. Similarly, when describing DNA and RNA collectively, the suffix can be replaced with “NAs” to indicate nucleic acids.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7981329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79813292021-04-12 Towards systematic nomenclature for cell-free DNA Bronkhorst, Abel J. Ungerer, Vida Diehl, Frank Anker, Philippe Dor, Yuval Fleischhacker, Michael Gahan, Peter B. Hui, Lisa Holdenrieder, Stefan Thierry, Alain R. Hum Genet Review Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has become widely recognized as a promising candidate biomarker for minimally invasive characterization of various genomic disorders and other clinical scenarios. However, among the obstacles that currently challenge the general progression of the research field, there remains an unmet need for unambiguous universal cfDNA nomenclature. To address this shortcoming, we classify in this report the different types of cfDNA molecules that occur in the human body based on its origin, genetic traits, and locality. We proceed by assigning existing terms to each of these cfDNA subtypes, while proposing new terms and abbreviations where clarity is lacking and more precise stratification would be beneficial. We then suggest the proper usage of these terms within different contexts and scenarios, focusing mainly on the nomenclature as it relates to the domains of oncology, prenatal testing, and post-transplant surgery surveillance. We hope that these recommendations will serve as useful considerations towards the establishment of universal cfDNA nomenclature in the future. In addition, it is conceivable that many of these recommendations can be transposed to cell-free RNA nomenclature by simply exchanging “DNA” with “RNA” in each acronym/abbreviation. Similarly, when describing DNA and RNA collectively, the suffix can be replaced with “NAs” to indicate nucleic acids. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7981329/ /pubmed/33123832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00439-020-02227-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Bronkhorst, Abel J.
Ungerer, Vida
Diehl, Frank
Anker, Philippe
Dor, Yuval
Fleischhacker, Michael
Gahan, Peter B.
Hui, Lisa
Holdenrieder, Stefan
Thierry, Alain R.
Towards systematic nomenclature for cell-free DNA
title Towards systematic nomenclature for cell-free DNA
title_full Towards systematic nomenclature for cell-free DNA
title_fullStr Towards systematic nomenclature for cell-free DNA
title_full_unstemmed Towards systematic nomenclature for cell-free DNA
title_short Towards systematic nomenclature for cell-free DNA
title_sort towards systematic nomenclature for cell-free dna
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7981329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00439-020-02227-2
work_keys_str_mv AT bronkhorstabelj towardssystematicnomenclatureforcellfreedna
AT ungerervida towardssystematicnomenclatureforcellfreedna
AT diehlfrank towardssystematicnomenclatureforcellfreedna
AT ankerphilippe towardssystematicnomenclatureforcellfreedna
AT doryuval towardssystematicnomenclatureforcellfreedna
AT fleischhackermichael towardssystematicnomenclatureforcellfreedna
AT gahanpeterb towardssystematicnomenclatureforcellfreedna
AT huilisa towardssystematicnomenclatureforcellfreedna
AT holdenriederstefan towardssystematicnomenclatureforcellfreedna
AT thierryalainr towardssystematicnomenclatureforcellfreedna