Cargando…
Towards systematic nomenclature for cell-free DNA
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has become widely recognized as a promising candidate biomarker for minimally invasive characterization of various genomic disorders and other clinical scenarios. However, among the obstacles that currently challenge the general progression of the research field, there remains...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7981329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00439-020-02227-2 |
_version_ | 1783667531475582976 |
---|---|
author | Bronkhorst, Abel J. Ungerer, Vida Diehl, Frank Anker, Philippe Dor, Yuval Fleischhacker, Michael Gahan, Peter B. Hui, Lisa Holdenrieder, Stefan Thierry, Alain R. |
author_facet | Bronkhorst, Abel J. Ungerer, Vida Diehl, Frank Anker, Philippe Dor, Yuval Fleischhacker, Michael Gahan, Peter B. Hui, Lisa Holdenrieder, Stefan Thierry, Alain R. |
author_sort | Bronkhorst, Abel J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has become widely recognized as a promising candidate biomarker for minimally invasive characterization of various genomic disorders and other clinical scenarios. However, among the obstacles that currently challenge the general progression of the research field, there remains an unmet need for unambiguous universal cfDNA nomenclature. To address this shortcoming, we classify in this report the different types of cfDNA molecules that occur in the human body based on its origin, genetic traits, and locality. We proceed by assigning existing terms to each of these cfDNA subtypes, while proposing new terms and abbreviations where clarity is lacking and more precise stratification would be beneficial. We then suggest the proper usage of these terms within different contexts and scenarios, focusing mainly on the nomenclature as it relates to the domains of oncology, prenatal testing, and post-transplant surgery surveillance. We hope that these recommendations will serve as useful considerations towards the establishment of universal cfDNA nomenclature in the future. In addition, it is conceivable that many of these recommendations can be transposed to cell-free RNA nomenclature by simply exchanging “DNA” with “RNA” in each acronym/abbreviation. Similarly, when describing DNA and RNA collectively, the suffix can be replaced with “NAs” to indicate nucleic acids. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7981329 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79813292021-04-12 Towards systematic nomenclature for cell-free DNA Bronkhorst, Abel J. Ungerer, Vida Diehl, Frank Anker, Philippe Dor, Yuval Fleischhacker, Michael Gahan, Peter B. Hui, Lisa Holdenrieder, Stefan Thierry, Alain R. Hum Genet Review Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has become widely recognized as a promising candidate biomarker for minimally invasive characterization of various genomic disorders and other clinical scenarios. However, among the obstacles that currently challenge the general progression of the research field, there remains an unmet need for unambiguous universal cfDNA nomenclature. To address this shortcoming, we classify in this report the different types of cfDNA molecules that occur in the human body based on its origin, genetic traits, and locality. We proceed by assigning existing terms to each of these cfDNA subtypes, while proposing new terms and abbreviations where clarity is lacking and more precise stratification would be beneficial. We then suggest the proper usage of these terms within different contexts and scenarios, focusing mainly on the nomenclature as it relates to the domains of oncology, prenatal testing, and post-transplant surgery surveillance. We hope that these recommendations will serve as useful considerations towards the establishment of universal cfDNA nomenclature in the future. In addition, it is conceivable that many of these recommendations can be transposed to cell-free RNA nomenclature by simply exchanging “DNA” with “RNA” in each acronym/abbreviation. Similarly, when describing DNA and RNA collectively, the suffix can be replaced with “NAs” to indicate nucleic acids. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7981329/ /pubmed/33123832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00439-020-02227-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Bronkhorst, Abel J. Ungerer, Vida Diehl, Frank Anker, Philippe Dor, Yuval Fleischhacker, Michael Gahan, Peter B. Hui, Lisa Holdenrieder, Stefan Thierry, Alain R. Towards systematic nomenclature for cell-free DNA |
title | Towards systematic nomenclature for cell-free DNA |
title_full | Towards systematic nomenclature for cell-free DNA |
title_fullStr | Towards systematic nomenclature for cell-free DNA |
title_full_unstemmed | Towards systematic nomenclature for cell-free DNA |
title_short | Towards systematic nomenclature for cell-free DNA |
title_sort | towards systematic nomenclature for cell-free dna |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7981329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00439-020-02227-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bronkhorstabelj towardssystematicnomenclatureforcellfreedna AT ungerervida towardssystematicnomenclatureforcellfreedna AT diehlfrank towardssystematicnomenclatureforcellfreedna AT ankerphilippe towardssystematicnomenclatureforcellfreedna AT doryuval towardssystematicnomenclatureforcellfreedna AT fleischhackermichael towardssystematicnomenclatureforcellfreedna AT gahanpeterb towardssystematicnomenclatureforcellfreedna AT huilisa towardssystematicnomenclatureforcellfreedna AT holdenriederstefan towardssystematicnomenclatureforcellfreedna AT thierryalainr towardssystematicnomenclatureforcellfreedna |