Cargando…
Optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal CT in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols
BACKGROUND: Patient body size represents the main determinant of parenchymal enhancement and by adjusting the contrast media (CM) dose to patient weight may be a more appropriate approach to avoid a patient over dosage of CM. To compare the performance of fixed-dose and lean body weight (LBW)-adapte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7981367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33743100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-00980-0 |
_version_ | 1783667535684567040 |
---|---|
author | Caruso, Damiano Rosati, Elisa Panvini, Nicola Rengo, Marco Bellini, Davide Moltoni, Giulia Bracci, Benedetta Lucertini, Elena Zerunian, Marta Polici, Michela De Santis, Domenico Iannicelli, Elsa Anibaldi, Paolo Carbone, Iacopo Laghi, Andrea |
author_facet | Caruso, Damiano Rosati, Elisa Panvini, Nicola Rengo, Marco Bellini, Davide Moltoni, Giulia Bracci, Benedetta Lucertini, Elena Zerunian, Marta Polici, Michela De Santis, Domenico Iannicelli, Elsa Anibaldi, Paolo Carbone, Iacopo Laghi, Andrea |
author_sort | Caruso, Damiano |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient body size represents the main determinant of parenchymal enhancement and by adjusting the contrast media (CM) dose to patient weight may be a more appropriate approach to avoid a patient over dosage of CM. To compare the performance of fixed-dose and lean body weight (LBW)-adapted contrast media dosing protocols, in terms of image quality and parenchymal enhancement. RESULTS: One-hundred cancer patients undergoing multiphasic abdominal CT were prospectively enrolled in this multicentric study and randomly divided in two groups: patients in fixed-dose group (n = 50) received 120 mL of CM while in LBW group (n = 50) the amount of CM was computed according to the patient’s LBW. LBW protocol group received a significantly lower amount of CM (103.47 ± 17.65 mL vs. 120.00 ± 0.00 mL, p < 0.001). Arterial kidney signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and pancreatic CNR were significantly higher in LBW group (all p ≤ 0.004). LBW group provided significantly higher arterial liver, kidney, and pancreatic contrast enhancement index (CEI) and portal venous phase kidney CEI (all p ≤ 0.002). Significantly lower portal vein SNR and CNR were observed in LBW-Group (all p ≤ 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: LBW-adapted CM administration for abdominal CT reduces the volume of injected CM and improves both image quality and parenchymal enhancement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7981367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79813672021-04-12 Optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal CT in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols Caruso, Damiano Rosati, Elisa Panvini, Nicola Rengo, Marco Bellini, Davide Moltoni, Giulia Bracci, Benedetta Lucertini, Elena Zerunian, Marta Polici, Michela De Santis, Domenico Iannicelli, Elsa Anibaldi, Paolo Carbone, Iacopo Laghi, Andrea Insights Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: Patient body size represents the main determinant of parenchymal enhancement and by adjusting the contrast media (CM) dose to patient weight may be a more appropriate approach to avoid a patient over dosage of CM. To compare the performance of fixed-dose and lean body weight (LBW)-adapted contrast media dosing protocols, in terms of image quality and parenchymal enhancement. RESULTS: One-hundred cancer patients undergoing multiphasic abdominal CT were prospectively enrolled in this multicentric study and randomly divided in two groups: patients in fixed-dose group (n = 50) received 120 mL of CM while in LBW group (n = 50) the amount of CM was computed according to the patient’s LBW. LBW protocol group received a significantly lower amount of CM (103.47 ± 17.65 mL vs. 120.00 ± 0.00 mL, p < 0.001). Arterial kidney signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and pancreatic CNR were significantly higher in LBW group (all p ≤ 0.004). LBW group provided significantly higher arterial liver, kidney, and pancreatic contrast enhancement index (CEI) and portal venous phase kidney CEI (all p ≤ 0.002). Significantly lower portal vein SNR and CNR were observed in LBW-Group (all p ≤ 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: LBW-adapted CM administration for abdominal CT reduces the volume of injected CM and improves both image quality and parenchymal enhancement. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7981367/ /pubmed/33743100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-00980-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Caruso, Damiano Rosati, Elisa Panvini, Nicola Rengo, Marco Bellini, Davide Moltoni, Giulia Bracci, Benedetta Lucertini, Elena Zerunian, Marta Polici, Michela De Santis, Domenico Iannicelli, Elsa Anibaldi, Paolo Carbone, Iacopo Laghi, Andrea Optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal CT in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols |
title | Optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal CT in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols |
title_full | Optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal CT in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols |
title_fullStr | Optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal CT in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal CT in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols |
title_short | Optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal CT in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols |
title_sort | optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal ct in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7981367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33743100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-00980-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carusodamiano optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols AT rosatielisa optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols AT panvininicola optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols AT rengomarco optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols AT bellinidavide optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols AT moltonigiulia optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols AT braccibenedetta optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols AT lucertinielena optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols AT zerunianmarta optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols AT policimichela optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols AT desantisdomenico optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols AT iannicellielsa optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols AT anibaldipaolo optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols AT carboneiacopo optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols AT laghiandrea optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols |