Cargando…

Optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal CT in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols

BACKGROUND: Patient body size represents the main determinant of parenchymal enhancement and by adjusting the contrast media (CM) dose to patient weight may be a more appropriate approach to avoid a patient over dosage of CM. To compare the performance of fixed-dose and lean body weight (LBW)-adapte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caruso, Damiano, Rosati, Elisa, Panvini, Nicola, Rengo, Marco, Bellini, Davide, Moltoni, Giulia, Bracci, Benedetta, Lucertini, Elena, Zerunian, Marta, Polici, Michela, De Santis, Domenico, Iannicelli, Elsa, Anibaldi, Paolo, Carbone, Iacopo, Laghi, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7981367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33743100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-00980-0
_version_ 1783667535684567040
author Caruso, Damiano
Rosati, Elisa
Panvini, Nicola
Rengo, Marco
Bellini, Davide
Moltoni, Giulia
Bracci, Benedetta
Lucertini, Elena
Zerunian, Marta
Polici, Michela
De Santis, Domenico
Iannicelli, Elsa
Anibaldi, Paolo
Carbone, Iacopo
Laghi, Andrea
author_facet Caruso, Damiano
Rosati, Elisa
Panvini, Nicola
Rengo, Marco
Bellini, Davide
Moltoni, Giulia
Bracci, Benedetta
Lucertini, Elena
Zerunian, Marta
Polici, Michela
De Santis, Domenico
Iannicelli, Elsa
Anibaldi, Paolo
Carbone, Iacopo
Laghi, Andrea
author_sort Caruso, Damiano
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient body size represents the main determinant of parenchymal enhancement and by adjusting the contrast media (CM) dose to patient weight may be a more appropriate approach to avoid a patient over dosage of CM. To compare the performance of fixed-dose and lean body weight (LBW)-adapted contrast media dosing protocols, in terms of image quality and parenchymal enhancement. RESULTS: One-hundred cancer patients undergoing multiphasic abdominal CT were prospectively enrolled in this multicentric study and randomly divided in two groups: patients in fixed-dose group (n = 50) received 120 mL of CM while in LBW group (n = 50) the amount of CM was computed according to the patient’s LBW. LBW protocol group received a significantly lower amount of CM (103.47 ± 17.65 mL vs. 120.00 ± 0.00 mL, p < 0.001). Arterial kidney signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and pancreatic CNR were significantly higher in LBW group (all p ≤ 0.004). LBW group provided significantly higher arterial liver, kidney, and pancreatic contrast enhancement index (CEI) and portal venous phase kidney CEI (all p ≤ 0.002). Significantly lower portal vein SNR and CNR were observed in LBW-Group (all p ≤ 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: LBW-adapted CM administration for abdominal CT reduces the volume of injected CM and improves both image quality and parenchymal enhancement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7981367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79813672021-04-12 Optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal CT in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols Caruso, Damiano Rosati, Elisa Panvini, Nicola Rengo, Marco Bellini, Davide Moltoni, Giulia Bracci, Benedetta Lucertini, Elena Zerunian, Marta Polici, Michela De Santis, Domenico Iannicelli, Elsa Anibaldi, Paolo Carbone, Iacopo Laghi, Andrea Insights Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: Patient body size represents the main determinant of parenchymal enhancement and by adjusting the contrast media (CM) dose to patient weight may be a more appropriate approach to avoid a patient over dosage of CM. To compare the performance of fixed-dose and lean body weight (LBW)-adapted contrast media dosing protocols, in terms of image quality and parenchymal enhancement. RESULTS: One-hundred cancer patients undergoing multiphasic abdominal CT were prospectively enrolled in this multicentric study and randomly divided in two groups: patients in fixed-dose group (n = 50) received 120 mL of CM while in LBW group (n = 50) the amount of CM was computed according to the patient’s LBW. LBW protocol group received a significantly lower amount of CM (103.47 ± 17.65 mL vs. 120.00 ± 0.00 mL, p < 0.001). Arterial kidney signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and pancreatic CNR were significantly higher in LBW group (all p ≤ 0.004). LBW group provided significantly higher arterial liver, kidney, and pancreatic contrast enhancement index (CEI) and portal venous phase kidney CEI (all p ≤ 0.002). Significantly lower portal vein SNR and CNR were observed in LBW-Group (all p ≤ 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: LBW-adapted CM administration for abdominal CT reduces the volume of injected CM and improves both image quality and parenchymal enhancement. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7981367/ /pubmed/33743100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-00980-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Caruso, Damiano
Rosati, Elisa
Panvini, Nicola
Rengo, Marco
Bellini, Davide
Moltoni, Giulia
Bracci, Benedetta
Lucertini, Elena
Zerunian, Marta
Polici, Michela
De Santis, Domenico
Iannicelli, Elsa
Anibaldi, Paolo
Carbone, Iacopo
Laghi, Andrea
Optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal CT in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols
title Optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal CT in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols
title_full Optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal CT in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols
title_fullStr Optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal CT in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal CT in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols
title_short Optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal CT in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols
title_sort optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal ct in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7981367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33743100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-00980-0
work_keys_str_mv AT carusodamiano optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols
AT rosatielisa optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols
AT panvininicola optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols
AT rengomarco optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols
AT bellinidavide optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols
AT moltonigiulia optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols
AT braccibenedetta optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols
AT lucertinielena optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols
AT zerunianmarta optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols
AT policimichela optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols
AT desantisdomenico optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols
AT iannicellielsa optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols
AT anibaldipaolo optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols
AT carboneiacopo optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols
AT laghiandrea optimizationofcontrastmediumvolumeforabdominalctinoncologicpatientsprospectivecomparisonbetweenfixedandleanbodyweightadapteddosingprotocols