Cargando…

Effects of refractive power on quantification using ultra‐widefield retinal imaging

BACKGROUND: Ultra-widefiled (UWF) retinal images include significant distortion when they are projected onto a two-dimensional surface for viewing. Therefore, many clinical studies that require quantitative analysis of fundus images have used stereographic projection algorithm, three-dimensional fun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Su-Ho, Jeong, Seongyong, Ahn, Jang Hwan, van Hemert, Jano, Sagong, Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7981888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33743646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-01900-y
_version_ 1783667605605711872
author Lim, Su-Ho
Jeong, Seongyong
Ahn, Jang Hwan
van Hemert, Jano
Sagong, Min
author_facet Lim, Su-Ho
Jeong, Seongyong
Ahn, Jang Hwan
van Hemert, Jano
Sagong, Min
author_sort Lim, Su-Ho
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ultra-widefiled (UWF) retinal images include significant distortion when they are projected onto a two-dimensional surface for viewing. Therefore, many clinical studies that require quantitative analysis of fundus images have used stereographic projection algorithm, three-dimensional fundus image was mapped to a two-dimensional stereographic plane by projecting all relevant pixels onto a plane through the equator of the eye. However, even with this impressive algorithm, refractive error itself might affect the size and quality of images theoretically. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of refractive power on retinal area measurements (quantification) using UWF retinal imaging (Optos California; Dunfermline, Scotland, UK). METHODS: A prospective, interventional study comprised 50 healthy eyes. UWF images were acquired first without the use of a soft contact lens (CL) and then repeated with six CLs (+ 9D, +6D, +3D, -3D, -6D, and − 9D). Using stereographically projected UWF images, the optic disc was outlined by 15–17 points and quantified in metric units. We divided the subjects into three groups according to axial length: Groups A (22–24 mm), B (24–26 mm), and C (≥ 26 mm). The primary outcome was percentage change before and after use of the CLs. Secondary outcome was proportion of subjects with magnification effects, maximal changes > 10 %. RESULTS: The study population was 6, 28, and 16 eyes in each group. Overall changes for the measured area were not significantly different in the whole study population. Group C had a larger proportion of magnification effects compared to Groups A and B (50.0 %, 0 %, and 3.6 %, P = 0.020). Measured area with plus lenses was significantly higher in Group C (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of CLs might affect quantification of eyes with long axial length when using UWF images. Ophthalmologists should consider refractive error when measuring area in long eyes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7981888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79818882021-03-22 Effects of refractive power on quantification using ultra‐widefield retinal imaging Lim, Su-Ho Jeong, Seongyong Ahn, Jang Hwan van Hemert, Jano Sagong, Min BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Ultra-widefiled (UWF) retinal images include significant distortion when they are projected onto a two-dimensional surface for viewing. Therefore, many clinical studies that require quantitative analysis of fundus images have used stereographic projection algorithm, three-dimensional fundus image was mapped to a two-dimensional stereographic plane by projecting all relevant pixels onto a plane through the equator of the eye. However, even with this impressive algorithm, refractive error itself might affect the size and quality of images theoretically. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of refractive power on retinal area measurements (quantification) using UWF retinal imaging (Optos California; Dunfermline, Scotland, UK). METHODS: A prospective, interventional study comprised 50 healthy eyes. UWF images were acquired first without the use of a soft contact lens (CL) and then repeated with six CLs (+ 9D, +6D, +3D, -3D, -6D, and − 9D). Using stereographically projected UWF images, the optic disc was outlined by 15–17 points and quantified in metric units. We divided the subjects into three groups according to axial length: Groups A (22–24 mm), B (24–26 mm), and C (≥ 26 mm). The primary outcome was percentage change before and after use of the CLs. Secondary outcome was proportion of subjects with magnification effects, maximal changes > 10 %. RESULTS: The study population was 6, 28, and 16 eyes in each group. Overall changes for the measured area were not significantly different in the whole study population. Group C had a larger proportion of magnification effects compared to Groups A and B (50.0 %, 0 %, and 3.6 %, P = 0.020). Measured area with plus lenses was significantly higher in Group C (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of CLs might affect quantification of eyes with long axial length when using UWF images. Ophthalmologists should consider refractive error when measuring area in long eyes. BioMed Central 2021-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7981888/ /pubmed/33743646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-01900-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lim, Su-Ho
Jeong, Seongyong
Ahn, Jang Hwan
van Hemert, Jano
Sagong, Min
Effects of refractive power on quantification using ultra‐widefield retinal imaging
title Effects of refractive power on quantification using ultra‐widefield retinal imaging
title_full Effects of refractive power on quantification using ultra‐widefield retinal imaging
title_fullStr Effects of refractive power on quantification using ultra‐widefield retinal imaging
title_full_unstemmed Effects of refractive power on quantification using ultra‐widefield retinal imaging
title_short Effects of refractive power on quantification using ultra‐widefield retinal imaging
title_sort effects of refractive power on quantification using ultra‐widefield retinal imaging
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7981888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33743646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-01900-y
work_keys_str_mv AT limsuho effectsofrefractivepoweronquantificationusingultrawidefieldretinalimaging
AT jeongseongyong effectsofrefractivepoweronquantificationusingultrawidefieldretinalimaging
AT ahnjanghwan effectsofrefractivepoweronquantificationusingultrawidefieldretinalimaging
AT vanhemertjano effectsofrefractivepoweronquantificationusingultrawidefieldretinalimaging
AT sagongmin effectsofrefractivepoweronquantificationusingultrawidefieldretinalimaging