Cargando…

Economic impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in minimally invasive cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND: ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) is a multidisciplinary and integrative approach with the goal of optimizing the postoperative recovery. We aimed to analyze the economic impact of a newly established ERAS protocol in minimally invasive heart valve surgery at our institution. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petersen, Johannes, Kloth, Benjamin, Konertz, Johanna, Kubitz, Jens, Schulte-Uentrop, Leonie, Ketels, Gesche, Reichenspurner, Hermann, Girdauskas, Evaldas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7981978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33743698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06218-5
_version_ 1783667624757952512
author Petersen, Johannes
Kloth, Benjamin
Konertz, Johanna
Kubitz, Jens
Schulte-Uentrop, Leonie
Ketels, Gesche
Reichenspurner, Hermann
Girdauskas, Evaldas
author_facet Petersen, Johannes
Kloth, Benjamin
Konertz, Johanna
Kubitz, Jens
Schulte-Uentrop, Leonie
Ketels, Gesche
Reichenspurner, Hermann
Girdauskas, Evaldas
author_sort Petersen, Johannes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) is a multidisciplinary and integrative approach with the goal of optimizing the postoperative recovery. We aimed to analyze the economic impact of a newly established ERAS protocol in minimally invasive heart valve surgery at our institution. METHODS: ERAS protocol was implemented in 61 consecutive patients who were referred for elective minimally-invasive aortic or mitral valve surgery, between February 1, 2018 and March 31, 2019 (ERAS-group). Another 69 patients who underwent elective minimally-invasive heart valve surgery during the same time period were managed according to the hospital standards (Control-group). A detailed cost comparison analysis was carried out from a hospital perspective using a micro-costing approach. RESULTS: The total in-hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ERAS-group compared to the Control-group (6.1 ± 2.6 vs 7.7 ± 3.8 days; p = 0.008) resulting in significant cost savings of €1087.2 per patient (p = 0.003). Due to the intensified physiotherapy in the ERAS protocol, the costs for physiotherapy were €94.3 higher compared to the Control-group (p < 0.001). The total costs in the ERAS cohort were €11,200.0 ± 3029.6/patient compared to € 13,109.8 ± 4527.5/patient in the Control-Group resulting in cost savings of €1909.8 patient due to the implementation of the ERAS protocol (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Implementation of an ERAS-protocol in minimally-invasive cardiac surgery can be carried out safely with a fast postoperative recovery of the patient. ERAS results in a financial benefit of up to €1909 per patient and therefore will play a key role in modern cardiac surgery in the near future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7981978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79819782021-03-22 Economic impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in minimally invasive cardiac surgery Petersen, Johannes Kloth, Benjamin Konertz, Johanna Kubitz, Jens Schulte-Uentrop, Leonie Ketels, Gesche Reichenspurner, Hermann Girdauskas, Evaldas BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) is a multidisciplinary and integrative approach with the goal of optimizing the postoperative recovery. We aimed to analyze the economic impact of a newly established ERAS protocol in minimally invasive heart valve surgery at our institution. METHODS: ERAS protocol was implemented in 61 consecutive patients who were referred for elective minimally-invasive aortic or mitral valve surgery, between February 1, 2018 and March 31, 2019 (ERAS-group). Another 69 patients who underwent elective minimally-invasive heart valve surgery during the same time period were managed according to the hospital standards (Control-group). A detailed cost comparison analysis was carried out from a hospital perspective using a micro-costing approach. RESULTS: The total in-hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ERAS-group compared to the Control-group (6.1 ± 2.6 vs 7.7 ± 3.8 days; p = 0.008) resulting in significant cost savings of €1087.2 per patient (p = 0.003). Due to the intensified physiotherapy in the ERAS protocol, the costs for physiotherapy were €94.3 higher compared to the Control-group (p < 0.001). The total costs in the ERAS cohort were €11,200.0 ± 3029.6/patient compared to € 13,109.8 ± 4527.5/patient in the Control-Group resulting in cost savings of €1909.8 patient due to the implementation of the ERAS protocol (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Implementation of an ERAS-protocol in minimally-invasive cardiac surgery can be carried out safely with a fast postoperative recovery of the patient. ERAS results in a financial benefit of up to €1909 per patient and therefore will play a key role in modern cardiac surgery in the near future. BioMed Central 2021-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7981978/ /pubmed/33743698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06218-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Petersen, Johannes
Kloth, Benjamin
Konertz, Johanna
Kubitz, Jens
Schulte-Uentrop, Leonie
Ketels, Gesche
Reichenspurner, Hermann
Girdauskas, Evaldas
Economic impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in minimally invasive cardiac surgery
title Economic impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in minimally invasive cardiac surgery
title_full Economic impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in minimally invasive cardiac surgery
title_fullStr Economic impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in minimally invasive cardiac surgery
title_full_unstemmed Economic impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in minimally invasive cardiac surgery
title_short Economic impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in minimally invasive cardiac surgery
title_sort economic impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in minimally invasive cardiac surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7981978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33743698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06218-5
work_keys_str_mv AT petersenjohannes economicimpactofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolinminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgery
AT klothbenjamin economicimpactofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolinminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgery
AT konertzjohanna economicimpactofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolinminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgery
AT kubitzjens economicimpactofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolinminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgery
AT schulteuentropleonie economicimpactofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolinminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgery
AT ketelsgesche economicimpactofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolinminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgery
AT reichenspurnerhermann economicimpactofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolinminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgery
AT girdauskasevaldas economicimpactofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolinminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgery