Cargando…

Influence of stereotactic imaging on operative time in deep brain stimulation

BACKGROUND: Various techniques are used across institutions for implantation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads. The most used techniques for each step include preoperative MRI fused to in-frame CT, intraoperative fluoroscopy, and postoperative CT, but postimplantation MRI also is used, as it was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinckard-Dover, Heather, Al-Hindi, Hytham, Goode, Grace, Scott, Hayden, Petersen, Erika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7982100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33767886
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_763_2020
_version_ 1783667649124761600
author Pinckard-Dover, Heather
Al-Hindi, Hytham
Goode, Grace
Scott, Hayden
Petersen, Erika
author_facet Pinckard-Dover, Heather
Al-Hindi, Hytham
Goode, Grace
Scott, Hayden
Petersen, Erika
author_sort Pinckard-Dover, Heather
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Various techniques are used across institutions for implantation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads. The most used techniques for each step include preoperative MRI fused to in-frame CT, intraoperative fluoroscopy, and postoperative CT, but postimplantation MRI also is used, as it was at our center. We present the quality assurance study performed at our institution after a change from postimplantation MRI performed across the hospital to postimplantation in room CT. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 123 patients who underwent bilateral DBS leads placement without same-day generator placement that was performed. The patients were divided by the type of postoperative imaging that was obtained. Patients were excluded if a unilateral lead placement was performed, if the case was a revision of an existing lead or deviated from the normal protocol. Operative room times and procedure times for each group were analyzed with Wilcoxon rank sums test (WRST) to determine any significant differences between groups. RESULTS: Postoperative MRI was performed for 82 patients, while postoperative CT was performed for 41 patients. A WRST showed a significant reduction in both operative room time (209 min to 170 min, P < 0.0001) and procedure time (140 min to 126 min, P = 0.0019). CONCLUSION: In-room CT allowed for a significant reduction in operative room time. Lower operative room time has been associated with increased patient comfort, and decreased cost. CT did not alter the revision rate for procedures. The significant reduction in procedure time may be attributed to increased team familiarity with procedure over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7982100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79821002021-03-24 Influence of stereotactic imaging on operative time in deep brain stimulation Pinckard-Dover, Heather Al-Hindi, Hytham Goode, Grace Scott, Hayden Petersen, Erika Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: Various techniques are used across institutions for implantation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads. The most used techniques for each step include preoperative MRI fused to in-frame CT, intraoperative fluoroscopy, and postoperative CT, but postimplantation MRI also is used, as it was at our center. We present the quality assurance study performed at our institution after a change from postimplantation MRI performed across the hospital to postimplantation in room CT. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 123 patients who underwent bilateral DBS leads placement without same-day generator placement that was performed. The patients were divided by the type of postoperative imaging that was obtained. Patients were excluded if a unilateral lead placement was performed, if the case was a revision of an existing lead or deviated from the normal protocol. Operative room times and procedure times for each group were analyzed with Wilcoxon rank sums test (WRST) to determine any significant differences between groups. RESULTS: Postoperative MRI was performed for 82 patients, while postoperative CT was performed for 41 patients. A WRST showed a significant reduction in both operative room time (209 min to 170 min, P < 0.0001) and procedure time (140 min to 126 min, P = 0.0019). CONCLUSION: In-room CT allowed for a significant reduction in operative room time. Lower operative room time has been associated with increased patient comfort, and decreased cost. CT did not alter the revision rate for procedures. The significant reduction in procedure time may be attributed to increased team familiarity with procedure over time. Scientific Scholar 2021-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7982100/ /pubmed/33767886 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_763_2020 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Surgical Neurology International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pinckard-Dover, Heather
Al-Hindi, Hytham
Goode, Grace
Scott, Hayden
Petersen, Erika
Influence of stereotactic imaging on operative time in deep brain stimulation
title Influence of stereotactic imaging on operative time in deep brain stimulation
title_full Influence of stereotactic imaging on operative time in deep brain stimulation
title_fullStr Influence of stereotactic imaging on operative time in deep brain stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Influence of stereotactic imaging on operative time in deep brain stimulation
title_short Influence of stereotactic imaging on operative time in deep brain stimulation
title_sort influence of stereotactic imaging on operative time in deep brain stimulation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7982100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33767886
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_763_2020
work_keys_str_mv AT pinckarddoverheather influenceofstereotacticimagingonoperativetimeindeepbrainstimulation
AT alhindihytham influenceofstereotacticimagingonoperativetimeindeepbrainstimulation
AT goodegrace influenceofstereotacticimagingonoperativetimeindeepbrainstimulation
AT scotthayden influenceofstereotacticimagingonoperativetimeindeepbrainstimulation
AT petersenerika influenceofstereotacticimagingonoperativetimeindeepbrainstimulation