Cargando…

Impact of Poststenting Fractional Flow Reserve on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes: The FFR-SEARCH Study

Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided treatment has been demonstrated to improve percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results. However, little is known on the long-term impact of low post-PCI FFR. METHODS: This is a large prospective all comers study evaluating the impact of post-PCI FFR on clini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diletti, Roberto, Masdjedi, Kaneshka, Daemen, Joost, van Zandvoort, Laurens J.C., Neleman, Tara, Wilschut, Jeroen, Den Dekker, Wijnand K., van Bommel, Rutger J., Lemmert, Miguel, Kardys, Isabella, Cummins, Paul, de Jaegere, Peter, Zijlstra, Felix, Van Mieghem, Nicolas M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7982137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33685214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009681
_version_ 1783667655609155584
author Diletti, Roberto
Masdjedi, Kaneshka
Daemen, Joost
van Zandvoort, Laurens J.C.
Neleman, Tara
Wilschut, Jeroen
Den Dekker, Wijnand K.
van Bommel, Rutger J.
Lemmert, Miguel
Kardys, Isabella
Cummins, Paul
de Jaegere, Peter
Zijlstra, Felix
Van Mieghem, Nicolas M.
author_facet Diletti, Roberto
Masdjedi, Kaneshka
Daemen, Joost
van Zandvoort, Laurens J.C.
Neleman, Tara
Wilschut, Jeroen
Den Dekker, Wijnand K.
van Bommel, Rutger J.
Lemmert, Miguel
Kardys, Isabella
Cummins, Paul
de Jaegere, Peter
Zijlstra, Felix
Van Mieghem, Nicolas M.
author_sort Diletti, Roberto
collection PubMed
description Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided treatment has been demonstrated to improve percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results. However, little is known on the long-term impact of low post-PCI FFR. METHODS: This is a large prospective all comers study evaluating the impact of post-PCI FFR on clinical outcomes. All patients undergoing successful PCI were eligible for enrollment. FFR measurements were performed immediately after PCI when the operator considered the angiographic result acceptable and final. No further action was undertaken based on the post-PCI result. Suboptimal post-PCI FFR was defined as FFR<0.90. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events, a composite of cardiac death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization at 2-year follow-up. Secondary end points were target vessel revascularizations and stent thrombosis and the separate components of the primary end point. RESULTS: A total of 1000 patients were enrolled. Post-PCI FFR was successfully measured in 1165 vessels from 959 patients. A poststenting FFR<0.90 was observed in 440 vessels (37.8%). A total of 399 patients had at least 1 vessel with FFR<0.90 post-PCI. At 2-year follow-up, a patient level analysis showed no association between post-PCI FFR and major adverse cardiac event (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08 [95% CI, 0.73–1.60], P=0.707), cardiac death (HR, 1.55 [95% CI, 0.72–3.36], P=0.261), any myocardial infarction (HR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.78–3.02], P=0.217). A vessel level analysis showed a higher rate of target vessel revascularization (HR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.06–3.44], P=0.030) and a tendency toward higher rate of stent thrombosis (HR, 2.89 [95% CI, 0.88–9.48], P=0.081) with final post-PCI FFR<0.90. CONCLUSIONS: Suboptimal post-PCI FFR has only a moderate impact on major adverse cardiac event but coronary arteries with a post-PCI FFR<0.90 have a higher rate of target vessel revascularization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7982137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79821372021-03-29 Impact of Poststenting Fractional Flow Reserve on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes: The FFR-SEARCH Study Diletti, Roberto Masdjedi, Kaneshka Daemen, Joost van Zandvoort, Laurens J.C. Neleman, Tara Wilschut, Jeroen Den Dekker, Wijnand K. van Bommel, Rutger J. Lemmert, Miguel Kardys, Isabella Cummins, Paul de Jaegere, Peter Zijlstra, Felix Van Mieghem, Nicolas M. Circ Cardiovasc Interv Original Articles Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided treatment has been demonstrated to improve percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results. However, little is known on the long-term impact of low post-PCI FFR. METHODS: This is a large prospective all comers study evaluating the impact of post-PCI FFR on clinical outcomes. All patients undergoing successful PCI were eligible for enrollment. FFR measurements were performed immediately after PCI when the operator considered the angiographic result acceptable and final. No further action was undertaken based on the post-PCI result. Suboptimal post-PCI FFR was defined as FFR<0.90. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events, a composite of cardiac death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization at 2-year follow-up. Secondary end points were target vessel revascularizations and stent thrombosis and the separate components of the primary end point. RESULTS: A total of 1000 patients were enrolled. Post-PCI FFR was successfully measured in 1165 vessels from 959 patients. A poststenting FFR<0.90 was observed in 440 vessels (37.8%). A total of 399 patients had at least 1 vessel with FFR<0.90 post-PCI. At 2-year follow-up, a patient level analysis showed no association between post-PCI FFR and major adverse cardiac event (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08 [95% CI, 0.73–1.60], P=0.707), cardiac death (HR, 1.55 [95% CI, 0.72–3.36], P=0.261), any myocardial infarction (HR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.78–3.02], P=0.217). A vessel level analysis showed a higher rate of target vessel revascularization (HR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.06–3.44], P=0.030) and a tendency toward higher rate of stent thrombosis (HR, 2.89 [95% CI, 0.88–9.48], P=0.081) with final post-PCI FFR<0.90. CONCLUSIONS: Suboptimal post-PCI FFR has only a moderate impact on major adverse cardiac event but coronary arteries with a post-PCI FFR<0.90 have a higher rate of target vessel revascularization. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7982137/ /pubmed/33685214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009681 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivs (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Diletti, Roberto
Masdjedi, Kaneshka
Daemen, Joost
van Zandvoort, Laurens J.C.
Neleman, Tara
Wilschut, Jeroen
Den Dekker, Wijnand K.
van Bommel, Rutger J.
Lemmert, Miguel
Kardys, Isabella
Cummins, Paul
de Jaegere, Peter
Zijlstra, Felix
Van Mieghem, Nicolas M.
Impact of Poststenting Fractional Flow Reserve on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes: The FFR-SEARCH Study
title Impact of Poststenting Fractional Flow Reserve on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes: The FFR-SEARCH Study
title_full Impact of Poststenting Fractional Flow Reserve on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes: The FFR-SEARCH Study
title_fullStr Impact of Poststenting Fractional Flow Reserve on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes: The FFR-SEARCH Study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Poststenting Fractional Flow Reserve on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes: The FFR-SEARCH Study
title_short Impact of Poststenting Fractional Flow Reserve on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes: The FFR-SEARCH Study
title_sort impact of poststenting fractional flow reserve on long-term clinical outcomes: the ffr-search study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7982137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33685214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009681
work_keys_str_mv AT dilettiroberto impactofpoststentingfractionalflowreserveonlongtermclinicaloutcomestheffrsearchstudy
AT masdjedikaneshka impactofpoststentingfractionalflowreserveonlongtermclinicaloutcomestheffrsearchstudy
AT daemenjoost impactofpoststentingfractionalflowreserveonlongtermclinicaloutcomestheffrsearchstudy
AT vanzandvoortlaurensjc impactofpoststentingfractionalflowreserveonlongtermclinicaloutcomestheffrsearchstudy
AT nelemantara impactofpoststentingfractionalflowreserveonlongtermclinicaloutcomestheffrsearchstudy
AT wilschutjeroen impactofpoststentingfractionalflowreserveonlongtermclinicaloutcomestheffrsearchstudy
AT dendekkerwijnandk impactofpoststentingfractionalflowreserveonlongtermclinicaloutcomestheffrsearchstudy
AT vanbommelrutgerj impactofpoststentingfractionalflowreserveonlongtermclinicaloutcomestheffrsearchstudy
AT lemmertmiguel impactofpoststentingfractionalflowreserveonlongtermclinicaloutcomestheffrsearchstudy
AT kardysisabella impactofpoststentingfractionalflowreserveonlongtermclinicaloutcomestheffrsearchstudy
AT cumminspaul impactofpoststentingfractionalflowreserveonlongtermclinicaloutcomestheffrsearchstudy
AT dejaegerepeter impactofpoststentingfractionalflowreserveonlongtermclinicaloutcomestheffrsearchstudy
AT zijlstrafelix impactofpoststentingfractionalflowreserveonlongtermclinicaloutcomestheffrsearchstudy
AT vanmieghemnicolasm impactofpoststentingfractionalflowreserveonlongtermclinicaloutcomestheffrsearchstudy