Cargando…
Difference in the efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implant before and after silicone oil removal: A case report
RATIONALE: An intravitreal dexamethasone (IV-DEX) implant is safe and effective for the treatment of macular edemas; however, the efficacy of IV-DEX implants in silicone oil (SO)-filled eyes remains controversial. There is no previous study comparing an IV-DEX implant in the same eye with and withou...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7982211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33726001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025161 |
_version_ | 1783667672242716672 |
---|---|
author | An, Jae Hong Kim, Yu Cheol |
author_facet | An, Jae Hong Kim, Yu Cheol |
author_sort | An, Jae Hong |
collection | PubMed |
description | RATIONALE: An intravitreal dexamethasone (IV-DEX) implant is safe and effective for the treatment of macular edemas; however, the efficacy of IV-DEX implants in silicone oil (SO)-filled eyes remains controversial. There is no previous study comparing an IV-DEX implant in the same eye with and without intravitreal SO. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 72-year-old man with proliferative diabetic retinopathy, macular edema, and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, treated with pars plana vitrectomy with SO tamponade had refractory macular edema. DIAGNOSIS: Refractory macular edema. INTERVENTION: Subtenon triamcinolone injection, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection, and IV-DEX implantation were performed; this was followed by intravitreal SO removal combined with IV-DEX implantation. OUTCOMES: The macular edema did not decrease significantly with posterior subtenon triamcinolone injection, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection, and IV-DEX implantation; however, the edema was relieved after SO removal and a new IV-DEX implantation. LESSONS: IV-DEX implant may be less efficacious in the treatment of macular edema in an SO-filled eye than that in a normal vitreous cavity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7982211 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79822112021-03-23 Difference in the efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implant before and after silicone oil removal: A case report An, Jae Hong Kim, Yu Cheol Medicine (Baltimore) 5800 RATIONALE: An intravitreal dexamethasone (IV-DEX) implant is safe and effective for the treatment of macular edemas; however, the efficacy of IV-DEX implants in silicone oil (SO)-filled eyes remains controversial. There is no previous study comparing an IV-DEX implant in the same eye with and without intravitreal SO. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 72-year-old man with proliferative diabetic retinopathy, macular edema, and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, treated with pars plana vitrectomy with SO tamponade had refractory macular edema. DIAGNOSIS: Refractory macular edema. INTERVENTION: Subtenon triamcinolone injection, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection, and IV-DEX implantation were performed; this was followed by intravitreal SO removal combined with IV-DEX implantation. OUTCOMES: The macular edema did not decrease significantly with posterior subtenon triamcinolone injection, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection, and IV-DEX implantation; however, the edema was relieved after SO removal and a new IV-DEX implantation. LESSONS: IV-DEX implant may be less efficacious in the treatment of macular edema in an SO-filled eye than that in a normal vitreous cavity. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7982211/ /pubmed/33726001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025161 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5800 An, Jae Hong Kim, Yu Cheol Difference in the efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implant before and after silicone oil removal: A case report |
title | Difference in the efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implant before and after silicone oil removal: A case report |
title_full | Difference in the efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implant before and after silicone oil removal: A case report |
title_fullStr | Difference in the efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implant before and after silicone oil removal: A case report |
title_full_unstemmed | Difference in the efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implant before and after silicone oil removal: A case report |
title_short | Difference in the efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implant before and after silicone oil removal: A case report |
title_sort | difference in the efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implant before and after silicone oil removal: a case report |
topic | 5800 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7982211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33726001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025161 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anjaehong differenceintheefficacyofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantbeforeandaftersiliconeoilremovalacasereport AT kimyucheol differenceintheefficacyofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantbeforeandaftersiliconeoilremovalacasereport |