Cargando…
Concurrent vs sequential chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy in combination with thoracic radiotherapy yields significant results in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with thoracic radiotherapy alone. However, whether concurrent or sequential delivery of chemotherapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7982214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33725921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021455 |
_version_ | 1783667672925339648 |
---|---|
author | Xiao, Wei Hong, Mei |
author_facet | Xiao, Wei Hong, Mei |
author_sort | Xiao, Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy in combination with thoracic radiotherapy yields significant results in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with thoracic radiotherapy alone. However, whether concurrent or sequential delivery of chemotherapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy is optimal remains unclear. Herein, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of concurrent vs sequential chemoradiotherapy in patients with NSCLC. METHODS: PubMed, EmBase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for RCTs focusing on concurrent and sequential chemoradiotherapy for patients with NSCLC. The pooled-effect estimate was calculated using the random-effects model. Sensitivity, subgroup, and publication biases were also evaluated. A total of 14 RCTs (2634 patients with NSCLC) were selected for the final meta-analysis. RESULTS: Compared with sequential chemoradiotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy did not increase the 1-year survival rates; however, concurrent chemoradiotherapy significantly increased the 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival rates. Moreover, although there were no significant differences between concurrent and sequential chemoradiotherapy in terms of distant relapse and locoregional plus distant relapse, concurrent chemoradiotherapy significantly reduced the risk of locoregional relapse. Furthermore, concurrent chemoradiotherapy yielded positive results with respect to overall response rates. Unfortunately, concurrent chemoradiotherapy could result in esophagitis, nausea/vomiting, and reduced leukocyte and platelet counts in patients with NSCLC. CONCLUSION: Compared with sequential chemoradiotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy may be significantly beneficial in terms of long-term survival and locoregional relapse, although it increases the risk of grade 3 (or greater) adverse events. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7982214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79822142021-03-23 Concurrent vs sequential chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Xiao, Wei Hong, Mei Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy in combination with thoracic radiotherapy yields significant results in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with thoracic radiotherapy alone. However, whether concurrent or sequential delivery of chemotherapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy is optimal remains unclear. Herein, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of concurrent vs sequential chemoradiotherapy in patients with NSCLC. METHODS: PubMed, EmBase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for RCTs focusing on concurrent and sequential chemoradiotherapy for patients with NSCLC. The pooled-effect estimate was calculated using the random-effects model. Sensitivity, subgroup, and publication biases were also evaluated. A total of 14 RCTs (2634 patients with NSCLC) were selected for the final meta-analysis. RESULTS: Compared with sequential chemoradiotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy did not increase the 1-year survival rates; however, concurrent chemoradiotherapy significantly increased the 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival rates. Moreover, although there were no significant differences between concurrent and sequential chemoradiotherapy in terms of distant relapse and locoregional plus distant relapse, concurrent chemoradiotherapy significantly reduced the risk of locoregional relapse. Furthermore, concurrent chemoradiotherapy yielded positive results with respect to overall response rates. Unfortunately, concurrent chemoradiotherapy could result in esophagitis, nausea/vomiting, and reduced leukocyte and platelet counts in patients with NSCLC. CONCLUSION: Compared with sequential chemoradiotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy may be significantly beneficial in terms of long-term survival and locoregional relapse, although it increases the risk of grade 3 (or greater) adverse events. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7982214/ /pubmed/33725921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021455 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5700 Xiao, Wei Hong, Mei Concurrent vs sequential chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | Concurrent vs sequential chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Concurrent vs sequential chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Concurrent vs sequential chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Concurrent vs sequential chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Concurrent vs sequential chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | concurrent vs sequential chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | 5700 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7982214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33725921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021455 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiaowei concurrentvssequentialchemoradiotherapyforpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT hongmei concurrentvssequentialchemoradiotherapyforpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |