Cargando…

A comparison of the analysis of 3 types of body fluids using the XN-350 hematology analyzer versus light microscopy assessment

We evaluated the capacity of the XN-350 instrument to analyze 3 different types of body fluid samples under “body fluid mode.” The performance of XN-350 was evaluated in terms of precision, carryover, limit of blank, limit of detection, limit of quantification, and linearity. Cell enumeration and di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jiwon, Cho, Younggeun, Kim, Han-Sung, Kang, Hee Jung, Kim, Miyoung, Lee, Young Kyung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7982217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33725957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024852
_version_ 1783667673635225600
author Lee, Jiwon
Cho, Younggeun
Kim, Han-Sung
Kang, Hee Jung
Kim, Miyoung
Lee, Young Kyung
author_facet Lee, Jiwon
Cho, Younggeun
Kim, Han-Sung
Kang, Hee Jung
Kim, Miyoung
Lee, Young Kyung
author_sort Lee, Jiwon
collection PubMed
description We evaluated the capacity of the XN-350 instrument to analyze 3 different types of body fluid samples under “body fluid mode.” The performance of XN-350 was evaluated in terms of precision, carryover, limit of blank, limit of detection, limit of quantification, and linearity. Cell enumeration and differential data produced by the XN-350 were compared to manual chamber counting results in 63 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 51 ascitic fluid, and 51 pleural fluid (PF) samples. Comparisons between XN-350 versus Cytospin data were also performed in PF samples. The precision, carry-over, limit of blank, and linearity of the XN-350 were acceptable. The limits of detection for white blood cells (WBCs) and red blood cells were 1.0/μL, and 1,000.0/μL, respectively; the corresponding limits of quantitation (LOQs) were 5.0/μL and 2,000.0/μL, respectively. The XN-350's cell enumeration and differential counting correlated well with those of manual chamber counting for all 3 sample types (except for differential counting in CSF samples), particularly parameters involving monocytes (r = 0.33) and mononuclear cells (MO- body fluid [BF]; r = 0.26), as well as total cell (TC-BF) enumeration (r = 0.50) and WBC-BF (r = 0.50) in PF samples. The MO-BF in CSF samples differed significantly from manual chamber counting results, but neither TC-BF nor WBC-BF in PF samples did. The XN-350 also showed good correlations with Cytospin analyses for differential counting of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes in PF samples. The differential counting of eosinophils via the XN-350 and Cytospin were not significantly correlated, but the difference between them was not significant. The XN-350 is an acceptable alternative to manual fluid analysis. Samples with low cellularity around the LOQ should be checked manually. Moreover, manual differential counting should be performed on CSF samples, particularity those with low cell numbers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7982217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79822172021-03-23 A comparison of the analysis of 3 types of body fluids using the XN-350 hematology analyzer versus light microscopy assessment Lee, Jiwon Cho, Younggeun Kim, Han-Sung Kang, Hee Jung Kim, Miyoung Lee, Young Kyung Medicine (Baltimore) 4800 We evaluated the capacity of the XN-350 instrument to analyze 3 different types of body fluid samples under “body fluid mode.” The performance of XN-350 was evaluated in terms of precision, carryover, limit of blank, limit of detection, limit of quantification, and linearity. Cell enumeration and differential data produced by the XN-350 were compared to manual chamber counting results in 63 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 51 ascitic fluid, and 51 pleural fluid (PF) samples. Comparisons between XN-350 versus Cytospin data were also performed in PF samples. The precision, carry-over, limit of blank, and linearity of the XN-350 were acceptable. The limits of detection for white blood cells (WBCs) and red blood cells were 1.0/μL, and 1,000.0/μL, respectively; the corresponding limits of quantitation (LOQs) were 5.0/μL and 2,000.0/μL, respectively. The XN-350's cell enumeration and differential counting correlated well with those of manual chamber counting for all 3 sample types (except for differential counting in CSF samples), particularly parameters involving monocytes (r = 0.33) and mononuclear cells (MO- body fluid [BF]; r = 0.26), as well as total cell (TC-BF) enumeration (r = 0.50) and WBC-BF (r = 0.50) in PF samples. The MO-BF in CSF samples differed significantly from manual chamber counting results, but neither TC-BF nor WBC-BF in PF samples did. The XN-350 also showed good correlations with Cytospin analyses for differential counting of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes in PF samples. The differential counting of eosinophils via the XN-350 and Cytospin were not significantly correlated, but the difference between them was not significant. The XN-350 is an acceptable alternative to manual fluid analysis. Samples with low cellularity around the LOQ should be checked manually. Moreover, manual differential counting should be performed on CSF samples, particularity those with low cell numbers. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7982217/ /pubmed/33725957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024852 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 4800
Lee, Jiwon
Cho, Younggeun
Kim, Han-Sung
Kang, Hee Jung
Kim, Miyoung
Lee, Young Kyung
A comparison of the analysis of 3 types of body fluids using the XN-350 hematology analyzer versus light microscopy assessment
title A comparison of the analysis of 3 types of body fluids using the XN-350 hematology analyzer versus light microscopy assessment
title_full A comparison of the analysis of 3 types of body fluids using the XN-350 hematology analyzer versus light microscopy assessment
title_fullStr A comparison of the analysis of 3 types of body fluids using the XN-350 hematology analyzer versus light microscopy assessment
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the analysis of 3 types of body fluids using the XN-350 hematology analyzer versus light microscopy assessment
title_short A comparison of the analysis of 3 types of body fluids using the XN-350 hematology analyzer versus light microscopy assessment
title_sort comparison of the analysis of 3 types of body fluids using the xn-350 hematology analyzer versus light microscopy assessment
topic 4800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7982217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33725957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024852
work_keys_str_mv AT leejiwon acomparisonoftheanalysisof3typesofbodyfluidsusingthexn350hematologyanalyzerversuslightmicroscopyassessment
AT choyounggeun acomparisonoftheanalysisof3typesofbodyfluidsusingthexn350hematologyanalyzerversuslightmicroscopyassessment
AT kimhansung acomparisonoftheanalysisof3typesofbodyfluidsusingthexn350hematologyanalyzerversuslightmicroscopyassessment
AT kangheejung acomparisonoftheanalysisof3typesofbodyfluidsusingthexn350hematologyanalyzerversuslightmicroscopyassessment
AT kimmiyoung acomparisonoftheanalysisof3typesofbodyfluidsusingthexn350hematologyanalyzerversuslightmicroscopyassessment
AT leeyoungkyung acomparisonoftheanalysisof3typesofbodyfluidsusingthexn350hematologyanalyzerversuslightmicroscopyassessment
AT leejiwon comparisonoftheanalysisof3typesofbodyfluidsusingthexn350hematologyanalyzerversuslightmicroscopyassessment
AT choyounggeun comparisonoftheanalysisof3typesofbodyfluidsusingthexn350hematologyanalyzerversuslightmicroscopyassessment
AT kimhansung comparisonoftheanalysisof3typesofbodyfluidsusingthexn350hematologyanalyzerversuslightmicroscopyassessment
AT kangheejung comparisonoftheanalysisof3typesofbodyfluidsusingthexn350hematologyanalyzerversuslightmicroscopyassessment
AT kimmiyoung comparisonoftheanalysisof3typesofbodyfluidsusingthexn350hematologyanalyzerversuslightmicroscopyassessment
AT leeyoungkyung comparisonoftheanalysisof3typesofbodyfluidsusingthexn350hematologyanalyzerversuslightmicroscopyassessment