Cargando…
Optimal Time Intervals in Two-Stage Takeover Warning Systems With Insight Into the Drivers’ Neuroticism Personality
Conditional automated driving [level 3, Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE)] requires drivers to take over the vehicle when an automated system’s failure occurs or is about to leave its operational design domain. Two-stage warning systems, which warn drivers in two steps, can be a promising method...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7982420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33762993 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601536 |
_version_ | 1783667713084751872 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Wei Zeng, Yilin Yang, Zhen Kang, Chunyan Wu, Changxu Shi, Jinlei Ma, Shu Li, Hongting |
author_facet | Zhang, Wei Zeng, Yilin Yang, Zhen Kang, Chunyan Wu, Changxu Shi, Jinlei Ma, Shu Li, Hongting |
author_sort | Zhang, Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Conditional automated driving [level 3, Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE)] requires drivers to take over the vehicle when an automated system’s failure occurs or is about to leave its operational design domain. Two-stage warning systems, which warn drivers in two steps, can be a promising method to guide drivers in preparing for the takeover. However, the proper time intervals of two-stage warning systems that allow drivers with different personalities to prepare for the takeover remain unclear. This study explored the optimal time intervals of two-stage warning systems with insights into the drivers’ neuroticism personality. A total of 32 drivers were distributed into two groups according to their self-ratings in neuroticism (high vs. low). Each driver experienced takeover under the two-stage warning systems with four time intervals (i.e., 3, 5, 7, and 9 s). The takeover performance (i.e., hands-on-steering-wheel time, takeover time, and maximum resulting acceleration) and subjective opinions (i.e., appropriateness and usefulness) for time intervals and situation awareness (SA) were recorded. The results showed that drivers in the 5-s time interval had the best takeover preparation (fast hands-on steering wheel responses and sufficient SA). Furthermore, both the 5- and 7-s time intervals resulted in more rapid takeover reactions and were rated more appropriate and useful than the 3- and 9-s time intervals. In terms of personality, drivers with high neuroticism tended to take over immediately after receiving takeover messages, at the cost of SA deficiency. In contrast, drivers with low neuroticism responded safely by judging whether they gained enough SA. We concluded that the 5-s time interval was optimal for drivers in two-stage takeover warning systems. When considering personality, drivers with low neuroticism had no strict requirements for time intervals. However, the extended time intervals were favorable for drivers with high neuroticism in developing SA. The present findings have reference implications for designers and engineers to set the time intervals of two-stage warning systems according to the neuroticism personality of drivers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7982420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79824202021-03-23 Optimal Time Intervals in Two-Stage Takeover Warning Systems With Insight Into the Drivers’ Neuroticism Personality Zhang, Wei Zeng, Yilin Yang, Zhen Kang, Chunyan Wu, Changxu Shi, Jinlei Ma, Shu Li, Hongting Front Psychol Psychology Conditional automated driving [level 3, Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE)] requires drivers to take over the vehicle when an automated system’s failure occurs or is about to leave its operational design domain. Two-stage warning systems, which warn drivers in two steps, can be a promising method to guide drivers in preparing for the takeover. However, the proper time intervals of two-stage warning systems that allow drivers with different personalities to prepare for the takeover remain unclear. This study explored the optimal time intervals of two-stage warning systems with insights into the drivers’ neuroticism personality. A total of 32 drivers were distributed into two groups according to their self-ratings in neuroticism (high vs. low). Each driver experienced takeover under the two-stage warning systems with four time intervals (i.e., 3, 5, 7, and 9 s). The takeover performance (i.e., hands-on-steering-wheel time, takeover time, and maximum resulting acceleration) and subjective opinions (i.e., appropriateness and usefulness) for time intervals and situation awareness (SA) were recorded. The results showed that drivers in the 5-s time interval had the best takeover preparation (fast hands-on steering wheel responses and sufficient SA). Furthermore, both the 5- and 7-s time intervals resulted in more rapid takeover reactions and were rated more appropriate and useful than the 3- and 9-s time intervals. In terms of personality, drivers with high neuroticism tended to take over immediately after receiving takeover messages, at the cost of SA deficiency. In contrast, drivers with low neuroticism responded safely by judging whether they gained enough SA. We concluded that the 5-s time interval was optimal for drivers in two-stage takeover warning systems. When considering personality, drivers with low neuroticism had no strict requirements for time intervals. However, the extended time intervals were favorable for drivers with high neuroticism in developing SA. The present findings have reference implications for designers and engineers to set the time intervals of two-stage warning systems according to the neuroticism personality of drivers. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7982420/ /pubmed/33762993 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601536 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Zeng, Yang, Kang, Wu, Shi, Ma and Li. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Zhang, Wei Zeng, Yilin Yang, Zhen Kang, Chunyan Wu, Changxu Shi, Jinlei Ma, Shu Li, Hongting Optimal Time Intervals in Two-Stage Takeover Warning Systems With Insight Into the Drivers’ Neuroticism Personality |
title | Optimal Time Intervals in Two-Stage Takeover Warning Systems With Insight Into the Drivers’ Neuroticism Personality |
title_full | Optimal Time Intervals in Two-Stage Takeover Warning Systems With Insight Into the Drivers’ Neuroticism Personality |
title_fullStr | Optimal Time Intervals in Two-Stage Takeover Warning Systems With Insight Into the Drivers’ Neuroticism Personality |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal Time Intervals in Two-Stage Takeover Warning Systems With Insight Into the Drivers’ Neuroticism Personality |
title_short | Optimal Time Intervals in Two-Stage Takeover Warning Systems With Insight Into the Drivers’ Neuroticism Personality |
title_sort | optimal time intervals in two-stage takeover warning systems with insight into the drivers’ neuroticism personality |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7982420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33762993 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601536 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangwei optimaltimeintervalsintwostagetakeoverwarningsystemswithinsightintothedriversneuroticismpersonality AT zengyilin optimaltimeintervalsintwostagetakeoverwarningsystemswithinsightintothedriversneuroticismpersonality AT yangzhen optimaltimeintervalsintwostagetakeoverwarningsystemswithinsightintothedriversneuroticismpersonality AT kangchunyan optimaltimeintervalsintwostagetakeoverwarningsystemswithinsightintothedriversneuroticismpersonality AT wuchangxu optimaltimeintervalsintwostagetakeoverwarningsystemswithinsightintothedriversneuroticismpersonality AT shijinlei optimaltimeintervalsintwostagetakeoverwarningsystemswithinsightintothedriversneuroticismpersonality AT mashu optimaltimeintervalsintwostagetakeoverwarningsystemswithinsightintothedriversneuroticismpersonality AT lihongting optimaltimeintervalsintwostagetakeoverwarningsystemswithinsightintothedriversneuroticismpersonality |