Cargando…

Optimal Time Intervals in Two-Stage Takeover Warning Systems With Insight Into the Drivers’ Neuroticism Personality

Conditional automated driving [level 3, Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE)] requires drivers to take over the vehicle when an automated system’s failure occurs or is about to leave its operational design domain. Two-stage warning systems, which warn drivers in two steps, can be a promising method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Wei, Zeng, Yilin, Yang, Zhen, Kang, Chunyan, Wu, Changxu, Shi, Jinlei, Ma, Shu, Li, Hongting
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7982420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33762993
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601536
_version_ 1783667713084751872
author Zhang, Wei
Zeng, Yilin
Yang, Zhen
Kang, Chunyan
Wu, Changxu
Shi, Jinlei
Ma, Shu
Li, Hongting
author_facet Zhang, Wei
Zeng, Yilin
Yang, Zhen
Kang, Chunyan
Wu, Changxu
Shi, Jinlei
Ma, Shu
Li, Hongting
author_sort Zhang, Wei
collection PubMed
description Conditional automated driving [level 3, Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE)] requires drivers to take over the vehicle when an automated system’s failure occurs or is about to leave its operational design domain. Two-stage warning systems, which warn drivers in two steps, can be a promising method to guide drivers in preparing for the takeover. However, the proper time intervals of two-stage warning systems that allow drivers with different personalities to prepare for the takeover remain unclear. This study explored the optimal time intervals of two-stage warning systems with insights into the drivers’ neuroticism personality. A total of 32 drivers were distributed into two groups according to their self-ratings in neuroticism (high vs. low). Each driver experienced takeover under the two-stage warning systems with four time intervals (i.e., 3, 5, 7, and 9 s). The takeover performance (i.e., hands-on-steering-wheel time, takeover time, and maximum resulting acceleration) and subjective opinions (i.e., appropriateness and usefulness) for time intervals and situation awareness (SA) were recorded. The results showed that drivers in the 5-s time interval had the best takeover preparation (fast hands-on steering wheel responses and sufficient SA). Furthermore, both the 5- and 7-s time intervals resulted in more rapid takeover reactions and were rated more appropriate and useful than the 3- and 9-s time intervals. In terms of personality, drivers with high neuroticism tended to take over immediately after receiving takeover messages, at the cost of SA deficiency. In contrast, drivers with low neuroticism responded safely by judging whether they gained enough SA. We concluded that the 5-s time interval was optimal for drivers in two-stage takeover warning systems. When considering personality, drivers with low neuroticism had no strict requirements for time intervals. However, the extended time intervals were favorable for drivers with high neuroticism in developing SA. The present findings have reference implications for designers and engineers to set the time intervals of two-stage warning systems according to the neuroticism personality of drivers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7982420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79824202021-03-23 Optimal Time Intervals in Two-Stage Takeover Warning Systems With Insight Into the Drivers’ Neuroticism Personality Zhang, Wei Zeng, Yilin Yang, Zhen Kang, Chunyan Wu, Changxu Shi, Jinlei Ma, Shu Li, Hongting Front Psychol Psychology Conditional automated driving [level 3, Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE)] requires drivers to take over the vehicle when an automated system’s failure occurs or is about to leave its operational design domain. Two-stage warning systems, which warn drivers in two steps, can be a promising method to guide drivers in preparing for the takeover. However, the proper time intervals of two-stage warning systems that allow drivers with different personalities to prepare for the takeover remain unclear. This study explored the optimal time intervals of two-stage warning systems with insights into the drivers’ neuroticism personality. A total of 32 drivers were distributed into two groups according to their self-ratings in neuroticism (high vs. low). Each driver experienced takeover under the two-stage warning systems with four time intervals (i.e., 3, 5, 7, and 9 s). The takeover performance (i.e., hands-on-steering-wheel time, takeover time, and maximum resulting acceleration) and subjective opinions (i.e., appropriateness and usefulness) for time intervals and situation awareness (SA) were recorded. The results showed that drivers in the 5-s time interval had the best takeover preparation (fast hands-on steering wheel responses and sufficient SA). Furthermore, both the 5- and 7-s time intervals resulted in more rapid takeover reactions and were rated more appropriate and useful than the 3- and 9-s time intervals. In terms of personality, drivers with high neuroticism tended to take over immediately after receiving takeover messages, at the cost of SA deficiency. In contrast, drivers with low neuroticism responded safely by judging whether they gained enough SA. We concluded that the 5-s time interval was optimal for drivers in two-stage takeover warning systems. When considering personality, drivers with low neuroticism had no strict requirements for time intervals. However, the extended time intervals were favorable for drivers with high neuroticism in developing SA. The present findings have reference implications for designers and engineers to set the time intervals of two-stage warning systems according to the neuroticism personality of drivers. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7982420/ /pubmed/33762993 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601536 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Zeng, Yang, Kang, Wu, Shi, Ma and Li. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Zhang, Wei
Zeng, Yilin
Yang, Zhen
Kang, Chunyan
Wu, Changxu
Shi, Jinlei
Ma, Shu
Li, Hongting
Optimal Time Intervals in Two-Stage Takeover Warning Systems With Insight Into the Drivers’ Neuroticism Personality
title Optimal Time Intervals in Two-Stage Takeover Warning Systems With Insight Into the Drivers’ Neuroticism Personality
title_full Optimal Time Intervals in Two-Stage Takeover Warning Systems With Insight Into the Drivers’ Neuroticism Personality
title_fullStr Optimal Time Intervals in Two-Stage Takeover Warning Systems With Insight Into the Drivers’ Neuroticism Personality
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Time Intervals in Two-Stage Takeover Warning Systems With Insight Into the Drivers’ Neuroticism Personality
title_short Optimal Time Intervals in Two-Stage Takeover Warning Systems With Insight Into the Drivers’ Neuroticism Personality
title_sort optimal time intervals in two-stage takeover warning systems with insight into the drivers’ neuroticism personality
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7982420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33762993
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601536
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangwei optimaltimeintervalsintwostagetakeoverwarningsystemswithinsightintothedriversneuroticismpersonality
AT zengyilin optimaltimeintervalsintwostagetakeoverwarningsystemswithinsightintothedriversneuroticismpersonality
AT yangzhen optimaltimeintervalsintwostagetakeoverwarningsystemswithinsightintothedriversneuroticismpersonality
AT kangchunyan optimaltimeintervalsintwostagetakeoverwarningsystemswithinsightintothedriversneuroticismpersonality
AT wuchangxu optimaltimeintervalsintwostagetakeoverwarningsystemswithinsightintothedriversneuroticismpersonality
AT shijinlei optimaltimeintervalsintwostagetakeoverwarningsystemswithinsightintothedriversneuroticismpersonality
AT mashu optimaltimeintervalsintwostagetakeoverwarningsystemswithinsightintothedriversneuroticismpersonality
AT lihongting optimaltimeintervalsintwostagetakeoverwarningsystemswithinsightintothedriversneuroticismpersonality