Cargando…

Retrospective evaluation of single patient investigational new drug (IND) requests in pediatric oncology

BACKGROUND: Single patient Investigational New Drug (IND) applications are one mechanism through which experimental therapies are accessed for children with cancer. The landscape of use, outcomes, and toxicity from single patient INDs remains unknown in pediatric oncology. METHODS: We performed a re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shulman, David S., Kiwinda, Lulla V., Edwards, Stacey, Clinton, Catherine M., Hunt, Sarah, Greenspan, Lianne, Lawler, Kristen D., Reaman, Gregory, Al‐Sayegh, Hasan, Bona, Kira, O'Neill, Allison F., Shusterman, Suzanne, Janeway, Katherine A., Place, Andrew E., Chi, Susan N., Ma, Clement, DuBois, Steven G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7982629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33751835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3791
_version_ 1783667761065492480
author Shulman, David S.
Kiwinda, Lulla V.
Edwards, Stacey
Clinton, Catherine M.
Hunt, Sarah
Greenspan, Lianne
Lawler, Kristen D.
Reaman, Gregory
Al‐Sayegh, Hasan
Bona, Kira
O'Neill, Allison F.
Shusterman, Suzanne
Janeway, Katherine A.
Place, Andrew E.
Chi, Susan N.
Ma, Clement
DuBois, Steven G.
author_facet Shulman, David S.
Kiwinda, Lulla V.
Edwards, Stacey
Clinton, Catherine M.
Hunt, Sarah
Greenspan, Lianne
Lawler, Kristen D.
Reaman, Gregory
Al‐Sayegh, Hasan
Bona, Kira
O'Neill, Allison F.
Shusterman, Suzanne
Janeway, Katherine A.
Place, Andrew E.
Chi, Susan N.
Ma, Clement
DuBois, Steven G.
author_sort Shulman, David S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Single patient Investigational New Drug (IND) applications are one mechanism through which experimental therapies are accessed for children with cancer. The landscape of use, outcomes, and toxicity from single patient INDs remains unknown in pediatric oncology. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all single patient INDs requested and prescribed at a single institution between 1/1/2007 and 5/1/2019. We report aggregate data from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on single patient IND applications over the final two years of the study (2017–2019). We report an overview of all IND applications, as well as clinical descriptions of patients, treatments, outcomes, and toxicity. RESULTS: Over the 2‐year period, the FDA approved all 171 submitted single patient IND requests for pediatric oncology. We identified 56 requests from our center during the 12‐year study period, and all were approved (median time from FDA submission to approval: 1 day (range 0–12)). 71% of requests were based on disease histology. Lack of pediatric clinical trial (65%) was the most common reason for use. 48 approved requests were ultimately administered. The median duration of treatment was 84 days (range: 4–1590), with 3 patients remaining on treatment at time of analysis. Only 7% discontinued treatment due to toxicity. Three‐year overall survival was 50% (95% CI, 35–64). CONCLUSIONS: Single patient INDs in pediatric oncology were universally approved in our national and single‐center analysis. In our cohort, single patient INDs were primarily utilized based on disease histology, rather than genomics, for agents that lacked a clinical trial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7982629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79826292021-03-25 Retrospective evaluation of single patient investigational new drug (IND) requests in pediatric oncology Shulman, David S. Kiwinda, Lulla V. Edwards, Stacey Clinton, Catherine M. Hunt, Sarah Greenspan, Lianne Lawler, Kristen D. Reaman, Gregory Al‐Sayegh, Hasan Bona, Kira O'Neill, Allison F. Shusterman, Suzanne Janeway, Katherine A. Place, Andrew E. Chi, Susan N. Ma, Clement DuBois, Steven G. Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Single patient Investigational New Drug (IND) applications are one mechanism through which experimental therapies are accessed for children with cancer. The landscape of use, outcomes, and toxicity from single patient INDs remains unknown in pediatric oncology. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all single patient INDs requested and prescribed at a single institution between 1/1/2007 and 5/1/2019. We report aggregate data from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on single patient IND applications over the final two years of the study (2017–2019). We report an overview of all IND applications, as well as clinical descriptions of patients, treatments, outcomes, and toxicity. RESULTS: Over the 2‐year period, the FDA approved all 171 submitted single patient IND requests for pediatric oncology. We identified 56 requests from our center during the 12‐year study period, and all were approved (median time from FDA submission to approval: 1 day (range 0–12)). 71% of requests were based on disease histology. Lack of pediatric clinical trial (65%) was the most common reason for use. 48 approved requests were ultimately administered. The median duration of treatment was 84 days (range: 4–1590), with 3 patients remaining on treatment at time of analysis. Only 7% discontinued treatment due to toxicity. Three‐year overall survival was 50% (95% CI, 35–64). CONCLUSIONS: Single patient INDs in pediatric oncology were universally approved in our national and single‐center analysis. In our cohort, single patient INDs were primarily utilized based on disease histology, rather than genomics, for agents that lacked a clinical trial. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7982629/ /pubmed/33751835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3791 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Shulman, David S.
Kiwinda, Lulla V.
Edwards, Stacey
Clinton, Catherine M.
Hunt, Sarah
Greenspan, Lianne
Lawler, Kristen D.
Reaman, Gregory
Al‐Sayegh, Hasan
Bona, Kira
O'Neill, Allison F.
Shusterman, Suzanne
Janeway, Katherine A.
Place, Andrew E.
Chi, Susan N.
Ma, Clement
DuBois, Steven G.
Retrospective evaluation of single patient investigational new drug (IND) requests in pediatric oncology
title Retrospective evaluation of single patient investigational new drug (IND) requests in pediatric oncology
title_full Retrospective evaluation of single patient investigational new drug (IND) requests in pediatric oncology
title_fullStr Retrospective evaluation of single patient investigational new drug (IND) requests in pediatric oncology
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective evaluation of single patient investigational new drug (IND) requests in pediatric oncology
title_short Retrospective evaluation of single patient investigational new drug (IND) requests in pediatric oncology
title_sort retrospective evaluation of single patient investigational new drug (ind) requests in pediatric oncology
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7982629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33751835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3791
work_keys_str_mv AT shulmandavids retrospectiveevaluationofsinglepatientinvestigationalnewdrugindrequestsinpediatriconcology
AT kiwindalullav retrospectiveevaluationofsinglepatientinvestigationalnewdrugindrequestsinpediatriconcology
AT edwardsstacey retrospectiveevaluationofsinglepatientinvestigationalnewdrugindrequestsinpediatriconcology
AT clintoncatherinem retrospectiveevaluationofsinglepatientinvestigationalnewdrugindrequestsinpediatriconcology
AT huntsarah retrospectiveevaluationofsinglepatientinvestigationalnewdrugindrequestsinpediatriconcology
AT greenspanlianne retrospectiveevaluationofsinglepatientinvestigationalnewdrugindrequestsinpediatriconcology
AT lawlerkristend retrospectiveevaluationofsinglepatientinvestigationalnewdrugindrequestsinpediatriconcology
AT reamangregory retrospectiveevaluationofsinglepatientinvestigationalnewdrugindrequestsinpediatriconcology
AT alsayeghhasan retrospectiveevaluationofsinglepatientinvestigationalnewdrugindrequestsinpediatriconcology
AT bonakira retrospectiveevaluationofsinglepatientinvestigationalnewdrugindrequestsinpediatriconcology
AT oneillallisonf retrospectiveevaluationofsinglepatientinvestigationalnewdrugindrequestsinpediatriconcology
AT shustermansuzanne retrospectiveevaluationofsinglepatientinvestigationalnewdrugindrequestsinpediatriconcology
AT janewaykatherinea retrospectiveevaluationofsinglepatientinvestigationalnewdrugindrequestsinpediatriconcology
AT placeandrewe retrospectiveevaluationofsinglepatientinvestigationalnewdrugindrequestsinpediatriconcology
AT chisusann retrospectiveevaluationofsinglepatientinvestigationalnewdrugindrequestsinpediatriconcology
AT maclement retrospectiveevaluationofsinglepatientinvestigationalnewdrugindrequestsinpediatriconcology
AT duboissteveng retrospectiveevaluationofsinglepatientinvestigationalnewdrugindrequestsinpediatriconcology