Cargando…

Word Detection in Individual Subjects Is Difficult to Probe With Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation

Measuring cognition in single subjects presents unique challenges. On the other hand, individually sensitive measurements offer extraordinary opportunities, from informing theoretical models to enabling truly individualised clinical assessment. Here, we test the robustness of fast, periodic, and vis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnes, Lydia, Petit, Selene, Badcock, Nicholas A., Whyte, Christopher J., Woolgar, Alexandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7982886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33762904
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.602798
_version_ 1783667816791015424
author Barnes, Lydia
Petit, Selene
Badcock, Nicholas A.
Whyte, Christopher J.
Woolgar, Alexandra
author_facet Barnes, Lydia
Petit, Selene
Badcock, Nicholas A.
Whyte, Christopher J.
Woolgar, Alexandra
author_sort Barnes, Lydia
collection PubMed
description Measuring cognition in single subjects presents unique challenges. On the other hand, individually sensitive measurements offer extraordinary opportunities, from informing theoretical models to enabling truly individualised clinical assessment. Here, we test the robustness of fast, periodic, and visual stimulation (FPVS), an emerging method proposed to elicit detectable responses to written words in the electroencephalogram (EEG) of individual subjects. The method is non-invasive, passive, and requires only a few minutes of testing, making it a potentially powerful tool to test comprehension in those who do not speak or who struggle with long testing procedures. In an initial study, Lochy et al. (2015) used FPVS to detect word processing in eight out of 10 fluent French readers. Here, we attempted to replicate their study in a new sample of 10 fluent English readers. Participants viewed rapid streams of pseudo-words with words embedded at regular intervals, while we recorded their EEG. Based on Lochy et al. (2015) we expected that words would elicit a steady-state response at the word-presentation frequency (2 Hz) over parieto-occipital electrode sites. However, across 40 datasets (10 participants, two conditions, and two regions of interest–ROIs), only four datasets met the criteria for a unique response to words. This corresponds to a 10% detection rate. We conclude that FPVS should be developed further before it can serve as an individually-sensitive measure of written word processing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7982886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79828862021-03-23 Word Detection in Individual Subjects Is Difficult to Probe With Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation Barnes, Lydia Petit, Selene Badcock, Nicholas A. Whyte, Christopher J. Woolgar, Alexandra Front Neurosci Neuroscience Measuring cognition in single subjects presents unique challenges. On the other hand, individually sensitive measurements offer extraordinary opportunities, from informing theoretical models to enabling truly individualised clinical assessment. Here, we test the robustness of fast, periodic, and visual stimulation (FPVS), an emerging method proposed to elicit detectable responses to written words in the electroencephalogram (EEG) of individual subjects. The method is non-invasive, passive, and requires only a few minutes of testing, making it a potentially powerful tool to test comprehension in those who do not speak or who struggle with long testing procedures. In an initial study, Lochy et al. (2015) used FPVS to detect word processing in eight out of 10 fluent French readers. Here, we attempted to replicate their study in a new sample of 10 fluent English readers. Participants viewed rapid streams of pseudo-words with words embedded at regular intervals, while we recorded their EEG. Based on Lochy et al. (2015) we expected that words would elicit a steady-state response at the word-presentation frequency (2 Hz) over parieto-occipital electrode sites. However, across 40 datasets (10 participants, two conditions, and two regions of interest–ROIs), only four datasets met the criteria for a unique response to words. This corresponds to a 10% detection rate. We conclude that FPVS should be developed further before it can serve as an individually-sensitive measure of written word processing. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7982886/ /pubmed/33762904 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.602798 Text en Copyright © 2021 Barnes, Petit, Badcock, Whyte and Woolgar. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Barnes, Lydia
Petit, Selene
Badcock, Nicholas A.
Whyte, Christopher J.
Woolgar, Alexandra
Word Detection in Individual Subjects Is Difficult to Probe With Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation
title Word Detection in Individual Subjects Is Difficult to Probe With Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation
title_full Word Detection in Individual Subjects Is Difficult to Probe With Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation
title_fullStr Word Detection in Individual Subjects Is Difficult to Probe With Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Word Detection in Individual Subjects Is Difficult to Probe With Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation
title_short Word Detection in Individual Subjects Is Difficult to Probe With Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation
title_sort word detection in individual subjects is difficult to probe with fast periodic visual stimulation
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7982886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33762904
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.602798
work_keys_str_mv AT barneslydia worddetectioninindividualsubjectsisdifficulttoprobewithfastperiodicvisualstimulation
AT petitselene worddetectioninindividualsubjectsisdifficulttoprobewithfastperiodicvisualstimulation
AT badcocknicholasa worddetectioninindividualsubjectsisdifficulttoprobewithfastperiodicvisualstimulation
AT whytechristopherj worddetectioninindividualsubjectsisdifficulttoprobewithfastperiodicvisualstimulation
AT woolgaralexandra worddetectioninindividualsubjectsisdifficulttoprobewithfastperiodicvisualstimulation