Cargando…

Employment relations and dismissal regulations: Does employment legislation protect the health of workers?

Sociologists have long acknowledged that being in a precarious labour market position, whether employed or unemployed, can harm peoples' health. However, scholars have yet to fully investigate the possible contextual, institutional determinants of this relationship. Two institutions that were o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barlow, Pepita, Reeves, Aaron, McKee, Martin, Stuckler, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7983177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/spol.12487
_version_ 1783667856871784448
author Barlow, Pepita
Reeves, Aaron
McKee, Martin
Stuckler, David
author_facet Barlow, Pepita
Reeves, Aaron
McKee, Martin
Stuckler, David
author_sort Barlow, Pepita
collection PubMed
description Sociologists have long acknowledged that being in a precarious labour market position, whether employed or unemployed, can harm peoples' health. However, scholars have yet to fully investigate the possible contextual, institutional determinants of this relationship. Two institutions that were overlooked in previous empirical studies are the regulations that set minimum compensation for dismissal, severance payments, and entitlements to a period of notice before dismissal, notice periods. These institutions may be important for workers' health as they influence the degree of insecurity that workers are exposed to. Here, we test this hypothesis by examining whether longer notice periods and greater severance payments protect the health of labour market participants, both employed and unemployed. We constructed two cohorts of panel data before and during the European recession using data from 22 countries in the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (person years = 338,000). We find more generous severance payments significantly reduce the probability that labour market participants, especially the unemployed, will experience declines in self‐reported health, with a slightly weaker relationship for longer notice periods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7983177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79831772021-03-24 Employment relations and dismissal regulations: Does employment legislation protect the health of workers? Barlow, Pepita Reeves, Aaron McKee, Martin Stuckler, David Soc Policy Adm Original Articles Sociologists have long acknowledged that being in a precarious labour market position, whether employed or unemployed, can harm peoples' health. However, scholars have yet to fully investigate the possible contextual, institutional determinants of this relationship. Two institutions that were overlooked in previous empirical studies are the regulations that set minimum compensation for dismissal, severance payments, and entitlements to a period of notice before dismissal, notice periods. These institutions may be important for workers' health as they influence the degree of insecurity that workers are exposed to. Here, we test this hypothesis by examining whether longer notice periods and greater severance payments protect the health of labour market participants, both employed and unemployed. We constructed two cohorts of panel data before and during the European recession using data from 22 countries in the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (person years = 338,000). We find more generous severance payments significantly reduce the probability that labour market participants, especially the unemployed, will experience declines in self‐reported health, with a slightly weaker relationship for longer notice periods. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-14 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7983177/ /pubmed/33776168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/spol.12487 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Social Policy & Administration published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Barlow, Pepita
Reeves, Aaron
McKee, Martin
Stuckler, David
Employment relations and dismissal regulations: Does employment legislation protect the health of workers?
title Employment relations and dismissal regulations: Does employment legislation protect the health of workers?
title_full Employment relations and dismissal regulations: Does employment legislation protect the health of workers?
title_fullStr Employment relations and dismissal regulations: Does employment legislation protect the health of workers?
title_full_unstemmed Employment relations and dismissal regulations: Does employment legislation protect the health of workers?
title_short Employment relations and dismissal regulations: Does employment legislation protect the health of workers?
title_sort employment relations and dismissal regulations: does employment legislation protect the health of workers?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7983177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/spol.12487
work_keys_str_mv AT barlowpepita employmentrelationsanddismissalregulationsdoesemploymentlegislationprotectthehealthofworkers
AT reevesaaron employmentrelationsanddismissalregulationsdoesemploymentlegislationprotectthehealthofworkers
AT mckeemartin employmentrelationsanddismissalregulationsdoesemploymentlegislationprotectthehealthofworkers
AT stucklerdavid employmentrelationsanddismissalregulationsdoesemploymentlegislationprotectthehealthofworkers