Cargando…
Employment relations and dismissal regulations: Does employment legislation protect the health of workers?
Sociologists have long acknowledged that being in a precarious labour market position, whether employed or unemployed, can harm peoples' health. However, scholars have yet to fully investigate the possible contextual, institutional determinants of this relationship. Two institutions that were o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7983177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/spol.12487 |
_version_ | 1783667856871784448 |
---|---|
author | Barlow, Pepita Reeves, Aaron McKee, Martin Stuckler, David |
author_facet | Barlow, Pepita Reeves, Aaron McKee, Martin Stuckler, David |
author_sort | Barlow, Pepita |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sociologists have long acknowledged that being in a precarious labour market position, whether employed or unemployed, can harm peoples' health. However, scholars have yet to fully investigate the possible contextual, institutional determinants of this relationship. Two institutions that were overlooked in previous empirical studies are the regulations that set minimum compensation for dismissal, severance payments, and entitlements to a period of notice before dismissal, notice periods. These institutions may be important for workers' health as they influence the degree of insecurity that workers are exposed to. Here, we test this hypothesis by examining whether longer notice periods and greater severance payments protect the health of labour market participants, both employed and unemployed. We constructed two cohorts of panel data before and during the European recession using data from 22 countries in the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (person years = 338,000). We find more generous severance payments significantly reduce the probability that labour market participants, especially the unemployed, will experience declines in self‐reported health, with a slightly weaker relationship for longer notice periods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7983177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79831772021-03-24 Employment relations and dismissal regulations: Does employment legislation protect the health of workers? Barlow, Pepita Reeves, Aaron McKee, Martin Stuckler, David Soc Policy Adm Original Articles Sociologists have long acknowledged that being in a precarious labour market position, whether employed or unemployed, can harm peoples' health. However, scholars have yet to fully investigate the possible contextual, institutional determinants of this relationship. Two institutions that were overlooked in previous empirical studies are the regulations that set minimum compensation for dismissal, severance payments, and entitlements to a period of notice before dismissal, notice periods. These institutions may be important for workers' health as they influence the degree of insecurity that workers are exposed to. Here, we test this hypothesis by examining whether longer notice periods and greater severance payments protect the health of labour market participants, both employed and unemployed. We constructed two cohorts of panel data before and during the European recession using data from 22 countries in the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (person years = 338,000). We find more generous severance payments significantly reduce the probability that labour market participants, especially the unemployed, will experience declines in self‐reported health, with a slightly weaker relationship for longer notice periods. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-14 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7983177/ /pubmed/33776168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/spol.12487 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Social Policy & Administration published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Barlow, Pepita Reeves, Aaron McKee, Martin Stuckler, David Employment relations and dismissal regulations: Does employment legislation protect the health of workers? |
title | Employment relations and dismissal regulations: Does employment legislation protect the health of workers? |
title_full | Employment relations and dismissal regulations: Does employment legislation protect the health of workers? |
title_fullStr | Employment relations and dismissal regulations: Does employment legislation protect the health of workers? |
title_full_unstemmed | Employment relations and dismissal regulations: Does employment legislation protect the health of workers? |
title_short | Employment relations and dismissal regulations: Does employment legislation protect the health of workers? |
title_sort | employment relations and dismissal regulations: does employment legislation protect the health of workers? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7983177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/spol.12487 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barlowpepita employmentrelationsanddismissalregulationsdoesemploymentlegislationprotectthehealthofworkers AT reevesaaron employmentrelationsanddismissalregulationsdoesemploymentlegislationprotectthehealthofworkers AT mckeemartin employmentrelationsanddismissalregulationsdoesemploymentlegislationprotectthehealthofworkers AT stucklerdavid employmentrelationsanddismissalregulationsdoesemploymentlegislationprotectthehealthofworkers |