Cargando…

A rodent model of human dose-equivalent progestin-only implantable contraception

BACKGROUND: Long-acting, reversible contraceptives (LARC; progestin only) are an increasingly common hormonal contraceptive choice in reproductive aged women looking to suppress ovarian function and menstrual cyclicity. The overall objective was to develop and validate a rodent model of implanted et...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allaway, Heather C. M., Pierson, Roger A., Invik, Jesse, Bloomfield, Susan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7983206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33752672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00729-w
_version_ 1783667861485518848
author Allaway, Heather C. M.
Pierson, Roger A.
Invik, Jesse
Bloomfield, Susan A.
author_facet Allaway, Heather C. M.
Pierson, Roger A.
Invik, Jesse
Bloomfield, Susan A.
author_sort Allaway, Heather C. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Long-acting, reversible contraceptives (LARC; progestin only) are an increasingly common hormonal contraceptive choice in reproductive aged women looking to suppress ovarian function and menstrual cyclicity. The overall objective was to develop and validate a rodent model of implanted etonogestrel (ENG) LARC, at body size equivalent doses to the average dose received by women during each of the first 3 years of ENG subdermal rod LARC use. METHODS: Intact, virgin, female Sprague-Dawley rats (16-wk-old) were randomized to 1 of 4 groups (n = 8/group) of ENG LARC (high-0.30μg/d, medium-0.17μg/d, low-0.09μg/d, placebo-0.00μg/d) via a slow-release pellet implanted subcutaneously. Animals were monitored for 21 days before and 29 days following pellet implantation using vaginal smears, ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), saphenous blood draws, food consumption, and body weights. Data were analyzed by chi-square, non-parametric, univariate, and repeated measures 2-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Prior to pellet implantation there was no difference in time spent in estrus cycle phases among the treatment groups (p > 0.30). Following pellet implantation there was a dose-dependent impact on the time spent in diestrus and estrus (p < 0.05), with the high dose group spending more days in diestrus and fewer days in estrus. Prior to pellet insertion there was not an association between treatment group and estrus cycle classification (p = 0.57) but following pellet implantation there was a dose-dependent association with cycle classification (p < 0.02). Measurements from the UBM (ovarian volume, follicle count, corpora lutea count) indicate an alteration of ovarian function following pellet implantation. CONCLUSION: Assessment of estrus cyclicity indicated a dose-response relationship in the shift to a larger number of acyclic rats and longer in duration spent in the diestrus phase. Therefore, each dose in this model mimics some of the changes observed in the ovaries of women using ENG LARC and provides an opportunity for investigating the impacts on non-reproductive tissues in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7983206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79832062021-03-22 A rodent model of human dose-equivalent progestin-only implantable contraception Allaway, Heather C. M. Pierson, Roger A. Invik, Jesse Bloomfield, Susan A. Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Long-acting, reversible contraceptives (LARC; progestin only) are an increasingly common hormonal contraceptive choice in reproductive aged women looking to suppress ovarian function and menstrual cyclicity. The overall objective was to develop and validate a rodent model of implanted etonogestrel (ENG) LARC, at body size equivalent doses to the average dose received by women during each of the first 3 years of ENG subdermal rod LARC use. METHODS: Intact, virgin, female Sprague-Dawley rats (16-wk-old) were randomized to 1 of 4 groups (n = 8/group) of ENG LARC (high-0.30μg/d, medium-0.17μg/d, low-0.09μg/d, placebo-0.00μg/d) via a slow-release pellet implanted subcutaneously. Animals were monitored for 21 days before and 29 days following pellet implantation using vaginal smears, ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), saphenous blood draws, food consumption, and body weights. Data were analyzed by chi-square, non-parametric, univariate, and repeated measures 2-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Prior to pellet implantation there was no difference in time spent in estrus cycle phases among the treatment groups (p > 0.30). Following pellet implantation there was a dose-dependent impact on the time spent in diestrus and estrus (p < 0.05), with the high dose group spending more days in diestrus and fewer days in estrus. Prior to pellet insertion there was not an association between treatment group and estrus cycle classification (p = 0.57) but following pellet implantation there was a dose-dependent association with cycle classification (p < 0.02). Measurements from the UBM (ovarian volume, follicle count, corpora lutea count) indicate an alteration of ovarian function following pellet implantation. CONCLUSION: Assessment of estrus cyclicity indicated a dose-response relationship in the shift to a larger number of acyclic rats and longer in duration spent in the diestrus phase. Therefore, each dose in this model mimics some of the changes observed in the ovaries of women using ENG LARC and provides an opportunity for investigating the impacts on non-reproductive tissues in the future. BioMed Central 2021-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7983206/ /pubmed/33752672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00729-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Allaway, Heather C. M.
Pierson, Roger A.
Invik, Jesse
Bloomfield, Susan A.
A rodent model of human dose-equivalent progestin-only implantable contraception
title A rodent model of human dose-equivalent progestin-only implantable contraception
title_full A rodent model of human dose-equivalent progestin-only implantable contraception
title_fullStr A rodent model of human dose-equivalent progestin-only implantable contraception
title_full_unstemmed A rodent model of human dose-equivalent progestin-only implantable contraception
title_short A rodent model of human dose-equivalent progestin-only implantable contraception
title_sort rodent model of human dose-equivalent progestin-only implantable contraception
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7983206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33752672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00729-w
work_keys_str_mv AT allawayheathercm arodentmodelofhumandoseequivalentprogestinonlyimplantablecontraception
AT piersonrogera arodentmodelofhumandoseequivalentprogestinonlyimplantablecontraception
AT invikjesse arodentmodelofhumandoseequivalentprogestinonlyimplantablecontraception
AT bloomfieldsusana arodentmodelofhumandoseequivalentprogestinonlyimplantablecontraception
AT allawayheathercm rodentmodelofhumandoseequivalentprogestinonlyimplantablecontraception
AT piersonrogera rodentmodelofhumandoseequivalentprogestinonlyimplantablecontraception
AT invikjesse rodentmodelofhumandoseequivalentprogestinonlyimplantablecontraception
AT bloomfieldsusana rodentmodelofhumandoseequivalentprogestinonlyimplantablecontraception