Cargando…

POLST Signature Requirements: Responding With Compassion While Ensuring Informed Consent

The majority of states require the signature of a surrogate decision maker on a POLST form for a patient who lacks decisional capacity. While commendable in its intention to ensure informed consent, in some cases this may lead the surrogate to feel that they are signing their loved one’s “death warr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macauley, Robert, Tolle, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7983334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32869653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049909120953084
_version_ 1783667884525879296
author Macauley, Robert
Tolle, Susan
author_facet Macauley, Robert
Tolle, Susan
author_sort Macauley, Robert
collection PubMed
description The majority of states require the signature of a surrogate decision maker on a POLST form for a patient who lacks decisional capacity. While commendable in its intention to ensure informed consent, in some cases this may lead the surrogate to feel that they are signing their loved one’s “death warrant,” adding to their emotional and spiritual distress. In this paper we argue that such a signature should be recommended rather than required, as it is neither a sufficient nor necessary condition of informed consent. Additional steps—such as requiring the attestation and documentation of the signing health care professional that verbal consent was fully informed and voluntary—can achieve the ultimate goal of respecting patient autonomy without adding to the surrogate’s burden.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7983334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79833342021-03-31 POLST Signature Requirements: Responding With Compassion While Ensuring Informed Consent Macauley, Robert Tolle, Susan Am J Hosp Palliat Care Guest Editorial The majority of states require the signature of a surrogate decision maker on a POLST form for a patient who lacks decisional capacity. While commendable in its intention to ensure informed consent, in some cases this may lead the surrogate to feel that they are signing their loved one’s “death warrant,” adding to their emotional and spiritual distress. In this paper we argue that such a signature should be recommended rather than required, as it is neither a sufficient nor necessary condition of informed consent. Additional steps—such as requiring the attestation and documentation of the signing health care professional that verbal consent was fully informed and voluntary—can achieve the ultimate goal of respecting patient autonomy without adding to the surrogate’s burden. SAGE Publications 2020-09-01 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7983334/ /pubmed/32869653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049909120953084 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Guest Editorial
Macauley, Robert
Tolle, Susan
POLST Signature Requirements: Responding With Compassion While Ensuring Informed Consent
title POLST Signature Requirements: Responding With Compassion While Ensuring Informed Consent
title_full POLST Signature Requirements: Responding With Compassion While Ensuring Informed Consent
title_fullStr POLST Signature Requirements: Responding With Compassion While Ensuring Informed Consent
title_full_unstemmed POLST Signature Requirements: Responding With Compassion While Ensuring Informed Consent
title_short POLST Signature Requirements: Responding With Compassion While Ensuring Informed Consent
title_sort polst signature requirements: responding with compassion while ensuring informed consent
topic Guest Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7983334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32869653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049909120953084
work_keys_str_mv AT macauleyrobert polstsignaturerequirementsrespondingwithcompassionwhileensuringinformedconsent
AT tollesusan polstsignaturerequirementsrespondingwithcompassionwhileensuringinformedconsent