Cargando…
Patients' perspectives on a new delivery model in primary care: A propensity score matched analysis of patient‐reported outcomes in a Dutch cohort study
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: Primary Care Plus (PC+) focuses on the substitution of hospital‐based medical care to the primary care setting without moving hospital facilities. The aim of this study was to examine whether population health and experience of care in PC+ could be maintained. Therefor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7983912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32701197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.13426 |
_version_ | 1783667962710851584 |
---|---|
author | van den Bogaart, Esther H. A. Spreeuwenberg, Marieke D. Kroese, Mariëlle E. A. L. van Hoof, Sofie J. M. Hameleers, Niels Ruwaard, Dirk |
author_facet | van den Bogaart, Esther H. A. Spreeuwenberg, Marieke D. Kroese, Mariëlle E. A. L. van Hoof, Sofie J. M. Hameleers, Niels Ruwaard, Dirk |
author_sort | van den Bogaart, Esther H. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: Primary Care Plus (PC+) focuses on the substitution of hospital‐based medical care to the primary care setting without moving hospital facilities. The aim of this study was to examine whether population health and experience of care in PC+ could be maintained. Therefore, health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) and experienced quality of care from a patient perspective were compared between patients referred to PC+ and to hospital‐based outpatient care (HBOC). METHODS: This cohort study included patients from a Dutch region, visiting PC+ or HBOC between December 2014 and April 2018. With patient questionnaires (T0, T1 and T2), the HRQoL and experience of care were measured. One‐to‐two nearest neighbour calliper propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control for potential selection bias. Outcomes were compared using marginal linear models and Pearson chi‐square tests. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred thirteen PC+ patients were matched to 606 HBOC patients with well‐balanced baseline characteristics (SMDs <0.1). Regarding HRQoL outcomes, no significant interaction terms between time and group were found (P > .05), indicating no difference in HRQoL development between the groups over time. Regarding experienced quality of care, no differences were found between PC+ and HBOC patients. Only travel time was significantly shorter in the HBOC group (P ≤ .001). CONCLUSION: Results show equal effects on HRQoL outcomes over time between the groups. Regarding experienced quality of care, only differences in travel time were found. Taken as a whole, population health and quality of care were maintained with PC+ and future research should focus more on cost‐related outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7983912 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79839122021-03-24 Patients' perspectives on a new delivery model in primary care: A propensity score matched analysis of patient‐reported outcomes in a Dutch cohort study van den Bogaart, Esther H. A. Spreeuwenberg, Marieke D. Kroese, Mariëlle E. A. L. van Hoof, Sofie J. M. Hameleers, Niels Ruwaard, Dirk J Eval Clin Pract Original Papers RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: Primary Care Plus (PC+) focuses on the substitution of hospital‐based medical care to the primary care setting without moving hospital facilities. The aim of this study was to examine whether population health and experience of care in PC+ could be maintained. Therefore, health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) and experienced quality of care from a patient perspective were compared between patients referred to PC+ and to hospital‐based outpatient care (HBOC). METHODS: This cohort study included patients from a Dutch region, visiting PC+ or HBOC between December 2014 and April 2018. With patient questionnaires (T0, T1 and T2), the HRQoL and experience of care were measured. One‐to‐two nearest neighbour calliper propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control for potential selection bias. Outcomes were compared using marginal linear models and Pearson chi‐square tests. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred thirteen PC+ patients were matched to 606 HBOC patients with well‐balanced baseline characteristics (SMDs <0.1). Regarding HRQoL outcomes, no significant interaction terms between time and group were found (P > .05), indicating no difference in HRQoL development between the groups over time. Regarding experienced quality of care, no differences were found between PC+ and HBOC patients. Only travel time was significantly shorter in the HBOC group (P ≤ .001). CONCLUSION: Results show equal effects on HRQoL outcomes over time between the groups. Regarding experienced quality of care, only differences in travel time were found. Taken as a whole, population health and quality of care were maintained with PC+ and future research should focus more on cost‐related outcomes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-06-17 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7983912/ /pubmed/32701197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.13426 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers van den Bogaart, Esther H. A. Spreeuwenberg, Marieke D. Kroese, Mariëlle E. A. L. van Hoof, Sofie J. M. Hameleers, Niels Ruwaard, Dirk Patients' perspectives on a new delivery model in primary care: A propensity score matched analysis of patient‐reported outcomes in a Dutch cohort study |
title | Patients' perspectives on a new delivery model in primary care: A propensity score matched analysis of patient‐reported outcomes in a Dutch cohort study |
title_full | Patients' perspectives on a new delivery model in primary care: A propensity score matched analysis of patient‐reported outcomes in a Dutch cohort study |
title_fullStr | Patients' perspectives on a new delivery model in primary care: A propensity score matched analysis of patient‐reported outcomes in a Dutch cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Patients' perspectives on a new delivery model in primary care: A propensity score matched analysis of patient‐reported outcomes in a Dutch cohort study |
title_short | Patients' perspectives on a new delivery model in primary care: A propensity score matched analysis of patient‐reported outcomes in a Dutch cohort study |
title_sort | patients' perspectives on a new delivery model in primary care: a propensity score matched analysis of patient‐reported outcomes in a dutch cohort study |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7983912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32701197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.13426 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandenbogaartestherha patientsperspectivesonanewdeliverymodelinprimarycareapropensityscorematchedanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesinadutchcohortstudy AT spreeuwenbergmarieked patientsperspectivesonanewdeliverymodelinprimarycareapropensityscorematchedanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesinadutchcohortstudy AT kroesemarielleeal patientsperspectivesonanewdeliverymodelinprimarycareapropensityscorematchedanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesinadutchcohortstudy AT vanhoofsofiejm patientsperspectivesonanewdeliverymodelinprimarycareapropensityscorematchedanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesinadutchcohortstudy AT hameleersniels patientsperspectivesonanewdeliverymodelinprimarycareapropensityscorematchedanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesinadutchcohortstudy AT ruwaarddirk patientsperspectivesonanewdeliverymodelinprimarycareapropensityscorematchedanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesinadutchcohortstudy |